Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Dealing Phillips?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Bedford, KY
    Posts
    8,992

    Dealing Phillips?

    General Assumptions:
    1. The Reds will spend only up to an allocated budget numbers, probably somewhere between $80-90 million.
    2. The Red budget without Phillips (assuming Cordero payout) is just over $50 million.
    3. As of now, assuming no deals, Cincinnati has at last six likely arb eligible players (Masset, Janish, Arredondo, Bray, Volquez, and Bailey), which would raise payroll at least $6 million total.
    4. Cincinnati needs at least one TOR starter and a big hitter to bat cleanup.
    5. The Reds have five hitters best suited to hit either sixth or seventh in the lineup, in Phillips, Bruce, Heisey/Alonso, Stubbs, and Mesoraco/Hanigan/Hernandez.
    6. Cincinnati needs a leadoff hitter with very good on-base percentage.
    7. Lesser free agents, such as Kelly Johnson, Omar Infante, and Freddy Sanchez, will be cheaper and almost as productive.
    8. Possible converted SS (or converting Cozart to 2B and adding a free agent SS) free agents are Jose Reyes, Rafael Furcal, Orlanda Cabrera, Jimmy Rollins, and Marco Scutaro. All but Reyes profiles to be much, much cheaper than Phillips.
    9. Trading Phillips would provide valuable prospects.
    10. Teams needing a 2B like Phillips to improve their team at the deadline include: San Francisco, Chicago (AL) (w/ Beckham moving to 3B), Detroit, Cleveland, Atlanta, St. Louis (hehe), and Pittsburgh (w/ Walker moving to 3B).

    An example:
    Reds dump Phillips to Chicago (AL) for Christian Marrero and Addison Reid. Reds sign Rafael Furcal to a two-year, $14 million contract to play SS and move Zack Cozart to 2B, with Miguel Cairo as backup.

    Red lineup (assuming no deals for TOR starter or cleanup hitter):
    Furcal SS
    Cozart 2B
    Votto 1B
    Mesoraco C
    Bruce RF
    Rolen/ Frazier 3B
    Alonso/ Heisey platoon LF
    Stubbs CF

    Thoughts?
    "You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
    -- Christy Matthewson
    "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
    -- Leo Durocher

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,158

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Yeah, I'd consider this. Problem is, the expensive 2012 option and buyout makes Phillips less attractive for buyers. He's probably a rental.

    Don't know about the other stuff, but Phillips has slowed down considerably. May be an "old" 30 (where have I head that before?).

    That said, I don't see this happening. More likely is an Arroyo-type extension deal.
    That could work, too, as long as he doesn't fall off a cliff (fingers crossed).
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  4. #3
    Member RedLegsToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Fairfield, OH
    Posts
    597

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    You guys realize Furcal will be 34, cannot stay healthy and is hitting worse than Paul Janish this year, right?

  5. #4
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,158

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedLegsToday View Post
    You guys realize Furcal will be 34, cannot stay healthy and is hitting worse than Paul Janish this year, right?
    Whoa, I'd consider a deal for Phillips.
    The whole master plan that Scrap Irony put out there is a bit too much to digest in one sitting.
    (responding to "you guys")
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  6. #5
    Member muddie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, N.C.
    Posts
    1,982

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    As a matter of conversation...

    Will Rhymes in Detroit is looking for a second base gig. He started in Detroit this year before being sent down to Toledo. I think he is ready to move up but Detroit is financially obligated to Carlos Guillen. Dave Dombrowski does not impress me as an overly ( fill in the blank here) GM. Look at a trade with Detroit for Rhymes. I don't think it would be costly at all.

  7. #6
    Member RedLegsToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Fairfield, OH
    Posts
    597

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    sorry oneupper, i was more responding to Scrap there. I like Brandon as a player, but, I'd rather they just pick up the option or trade him, as opposed to extending him. 2nd baseman don't age well in general, and it's not like Brandon is the 2nd coming of Joe Morgan or anything.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    6,414

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by oneupper View Post
    Whoa, I'd consider a deal for Phillips.
    The whole master plan that Scrap Irony put out there is a bit too much to digest in one sitting.
    (responding to "you guys")
    I was for picking up BP's option next year, but his falloff has me wondering though if it's worth that chunk of change (especiallywhen it could be used elsewhere. If he is dealt, I would have to get his replacement back in his deal (or another consumated at the same time) - don't see any adequate in-house option for at least two years.

    What I'd ideally want as a replacement:

    * Young
    * Versatile - LH'd or SH for balance in the infield
    * Almost as good as BP on D (if not equal
    * Capable of hitting in one of the top two spots in the lineup (highend speed nice, but not necessary)
    * Under club control for 3-4 more seasons

    Relity? I think the Reds do pick up his option as a stopgap to let in-house options (Rodriguez/Puckett/Torreyes/Hamilton) get a year closer to ready.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    6,414

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
    General Assumptions:
    1. The Reds will spend only up to an allocated budget numbers, probably somewhere between $80-90 million.
    2. The Red budget without Phillips (assuming Cordero payout) is just over $50 million.
    3. As of now, assuming no deals, Cincinnati has at last six likely arb eligible players (Masset, Janish, Arredondo, Bray, Volquez, and Bailey), which would raise payroll at least $6 million total.
    4. Cincinnati needs at least one TOR starter and a big hitter to bat cleanup.
    5. The Reds have five hitters best suited to hit either sixth or seventh in the lineup, in Phillips, Bruce, Heisey/Alonso, Stubbs, and Mesoraco/Hanigan/Hernandez.
    6. Cincinnati needs a leadoff hitter with very good on-base percentage.
    7. Lesser free agents, such as Kelly Johnson, Omar Infante, and Freddy Sanchez, will be cheaper and almost as productive.
    8. Possible converted SS (or converting Cozart to 2B and adding a free agent SS) free agents are Jose Reyes, Rafael Furcal, Orlanda Cabrera, Jimmy Rollins, and Marco Scutaro. All but Reyes profiles to be much, much cheaper than Phillips.
    9. Trading Phillips would provide valuable prospects.
    10. Teams needing a 2B like Phillips to improve their team at the deadline include: San Francisco, Chicago (AL) (w/ Beckham moving to 3B), Detroit, Cleveland, Atlanta, St. Louis (hehe), and Pittsburgh (w/ Walker moving to 3B).

    An example:
    Reds dump Phillips to Chicago (AL) for Christian Marrero and Addison Reid. Reds sign Rafael Furcal to a two-year, $14 million contract to play SS and move Zack Cozart to 2B, with Miguel Cairo as backup.

    Red lineup (assuming no deals for TOR starter or cleanup hitter):
    Furcal SS
    Cozart 2B
    Votto 1B
    Mesoraco C
    Bruce RF
    Rolen/ Frazier 3B
    Alonso/ Heisey platoon LF
    Stubbs CF

    Thoughts?
    I've always loved Furcal and wanted to see him in a Reds uni, but just think age and injuries have taken their toll. I'd rather see the Cards spend prospects on him unless we can get him incredibly cheap.

  10. #9
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    4,865

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    I was for picking up BP's option next year, but his falloff has me wondering though if it's worth that chunk of change (especiallywhen it could be used elsewhere. If he is dealt, I would have to get his replacement back in his deal (or another consumated at the same time) - don't see any adequate in-house option for at least two years.
    At the risk of having missed something obvious... what falloff?

    I'll agree with others that I'm not sure at this point I'd want to extend the contract beyond 2012. But as for 2012 -- well, if Phillips is traded to save money, we'd better be sure there's something to spend the money on that will make the team a lot better, because second base would get considerably worse. I believe Phillips is kind of taken for granted around here sometimes; he's a top-ten-in-MLB second baseman both at bat and in the field, and that's not an easy combo to find. At this point, FanGraphs has him headed for a near-5 WAR season.
    Not all who wander are lost

  11. #10
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,002

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by IslandRed View Post
    At the risk of having missed something obvious... what falloff?

    I'll agree with others that I'm not sure at this point I'd want to extend the contract beyond 2012. But as for 2012 -- well, if Phillips is traded to save money, we'd better be sure there's something to spend the money on that will make the team a lot better, because second base would get considerably worse. I believe Phillips is kind of taken for granted around here sometimes; he's a top-ten-in-MLB second baseman both at bat and in the field, and that's not an easy combo to find. At this point, FanGraphs has him headed for a near-5 WAR season.
    Agree and the drop from Phillips to an average 2nd basemen on defense would probably offset most of any run prevention that upgrading the rotation would provide. He's the best second basemen I've seen in Cincy and that includes watching great defenders like Oester, Helms, Boone, Morgan and Pokey. Only Pokey is in the same ballpark as Phillips.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,754

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    I know Phillips is expensive, but he's one of the best 2B in the business.

    We likely don't improve getting rid of Phillips.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,079

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I know Phillips is expensive, but he's one of the best 2B in the business.

    We likely don't improve getting rid of Phillips.
    x2
    Go BLUE!!!

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    6,414

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I know Phillips is expensive, but he's one of the best 2B in the business.

    We likely don't improve getting rid of Phillips.
    Probably not and that's why i don't consider dealing him unless and adequate replacement (under club control for at least 2-3 years) is included the deal for Brandon or another made simmultaneously. In the end, i pick up the option (as I believe the Reds will). If by any chance, I can acquire a guy I like as a replacemtn and at the same time, get out from under that option so I can use the money for other purposes, I do it.

    The is zero way that I don't pick up the option if i don't have a plan for 2B.

  15. #14
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,491

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    I think what to do with BP is the biggest question the Reds have right now, and it's going to cause a lot of debate on the board for a long time.

    No shortstop is going to convert to second base unless it's a matter of getting an everyday job. However, there are plenty of teams looking for shortstops, so I don't think Furcal, Rollins, Scutaro, Reyes, etc. are going to make the switch. That said, the only potential 2012 free agent who could even sniff at Phillips' production is Aaron Hill, and that seems very unlikely.

    Ideally, the Reds could find a way to keep BP around through 2013 because in 2014, the Reds should have at least 1 of several second base prospects ready to produce, but BP will be looking for a long term deal, so that would be very difficult to do. Not only that, but the Reds might not be able to afford BP in 2013 due to Votto's huge raise anyway.

  16. #15
    Member CrackerJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    5,012

    Re: Dealing Phillips?

    Quote Originally Posted by IslandRed View Post
    At the risk of having missed something obvious... what falloff?

    I'll agree with others that I'm not sure at this point I'd want to extend the contract beyond 2012. But as for 2012 -- well, if Phillips is traded to save money, we'd better be sure there's something to spend the money on that will make the team a lot better, because second base would get considerably worse. I believe Phillips is kind of taken for granted around here sometimes; he's a top-ten-in-MLB second baseman both at bat and in the field, and that's not an easy combo to find. At this point, FanGraphs has him headed for a near-5 WAR season.
    What IR said.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25