Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

  1. #1
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    962

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Certainly glad that we didn't have him on the payroll for this year, as good as he was last time around. Our bullpen has been solid enough without him.

  4. #3
    Member mroby85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Really wish the Reds would bring him back, I loved Arthur!

  5. #4
    Old Red Guard Reject
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,419

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by The DARK View Post
    Certainly glad that we didn't have him on the payroll for this year, as good as he was last time around.
    Man, I wish we were saying that about Arroyo right now.
    If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby

  6. #5
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    I'm sure Dusty is lobbying Walt to pick him up.
    "I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

    "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,378

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Pick him up! LOL

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    404

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    per mlbtraderumors"

    The Cardinals may have interest in Arthur Rhodes, who was designated for assignment today by the Rangers. MLB.com's Matthew Leach reports that the Cards have "held significant interest [in Rhodes] in recent years" and notes that Tony La Russa made some vague quotes both praising Rhodes and saying his team needed another southpaw reliever.


    Should the Reds get him to keep him from the Cards??

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,378

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfansince72 View Post
    per mlbtraderumors"

    The Cardinals may have interest in Arthur Rhodes, who was designated for assignment today by the Rangers. MLB.com's Matthew Leach reports that the Cards have "held significant interest [in Rhodes] in recent years" and notes that Tony La Russa made some vague quotes both praising Rhodes and saying his team needed another southpaw reliever.


    Should the Reds get him to keep him from the Cards??
    That would imply we think we still have a chance this year.

  10. #9
    Member LeDoux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Knoxville
    Posts
    596

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfansince72 View Post
    The Cardinals may have interest in Arthur Rhodes.
    Our angel is a centerfold.

  11. #10
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by DocRed View Post
    That would imply we think we still have a chance this year.
    Or we just want to screw the Cards

  12. #11
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by LeDoux View Post
    Our angel is a centerfold.
    I might have to freezeframe that.
    "I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

    "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    3,262

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by LeDoux View Post
    Our angel is a centerfold.
    Either I am very tired, or this is the funniest post I may have ever seen on here. As tored as I am, I actually think the latter, good job LeDoux!!
    UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs
    57, 82, 93, 05, 09
    Go Heels!!!!!

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    3,262

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Loved him as much as any Red last season, amazing season he had and wish he could have gone out that way. I was concerned for this year after all the foot problems last year.
    UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs
    57, 82, 93, 05, 09
    Go Heels!!!!!

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    341

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    Quote Originally Posted by The DARK View Post
    Certainly glad that we didn't have him on the payroll for this year, as good as he was last time around. Our bullpen has been solid enough without him.
    Our bullpen is solid? How often do you watch Reds games? Not saying Arthur would help us...

  16. #15
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: Rangers Designate Arthur Rhodes For Assignment

    He is to be released

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/0...r-rhodes-.html

    the Reds can sign him for pro-rated MLB minimum


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25