Turn Off Ads?
Page 66 of 67 FirstFirst ... 1656626364656667 LastLast
Results 976 to 990 of 993

Thread: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

  1. #976
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Crown
    Posts
    4,139

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by AmarilloRed View Post
    I'm not really surprised the Reds haven't negotiated with Brandon since the winter meetings, and doubt anything happens with a extension for Brandon the rest of the offseason. I think Latos and Marshall will be a higher priority for the Reds to give extensions to, and extensions for those 2 really will use up the money that would have been earmarked for Brandon.
    On the other hand a 5 million deferral in 2012 from Brandon to go along with an extension could help acquire the needed pieces in LF, UT and bullpen. Just a thought.
    2015 Rotation: Under Construction


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #977
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,061

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by mdccclxix View Post
    On the other hand a 5 million deferral in 2012 from Brandon to go along with an extension could help acquire the needed pieces in LF, UT and bullpen. Just a thought.
    Or fund the signing bonus for an extension for Latos or Marshall.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  4. #978
    Member Marc D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    3,111

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    I saw on MLBTR a while back that there was talk of Atlanta dealing Martin Prado to Colorado for Seth Smith and a prospect named Tim Wheeler.

    I'm not familiar with Wheeler, do the Reds have something similar they could send to Atlanta and is Prado still a viable target? I know he had a bad year last year but before that he was very good, plays 2B/3B/LF, has OBP skills and under control for a while.

    Seems logical to me but maybe there is something wrong with him?

  5. #979
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Bedford, KY
    Posts
    8,992

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Nothing wrong with Prado other than the Braves undervaluing him.

    He'd be a great target and a fine, fine #2 hole hitter.

    But I doubt Cincinnati has the bullets to get him, though Heisey would interest Atlanta, IMO.

  6. #980
    You're being very UnDude. sonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
    Nothing wrong with Prado other than the Braves undervaluing him.

    He'd be a great target and a fine, fine #2 hole hitter.

    But I doubt Cincinnati has the bullets to get him, though Heisey would interest Atlanta, IMO.
    Heisey and Pile O'Cash?
    Witty signature.

  7. #981
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,892

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Prado....hmmm.

    Not for the OF but what about putting him at 2b and trading BP? The net money saved and spent elsewhere could be a plus for the Reds.

  8. #982
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Bedford, KY
    Posts
    8,992

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Prado as an OF/IF utility guy would solve a lot of problems, IMO. He's a high obp guy normally who doesn't K all that much. I wouldn't deal him for Phillips, as Phillips has a ton of defensive value and is just about the same offensively at this point.

    I would deal for him.

  9. #983
    Member Marc D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    3,111

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
    Nothing wrong with Prado other than the Braves undervaluing him.

    He'd be a great target and a fine, fine #2 hole hitter.

    But I doubt Cincinnati has the bullets to get him, though Heisey would interest Atlanta, IMO.
    Quote Originally Posted by sonny View Post
    Heisey and Pile O'Cash?
    Heisey and Frazier for Prado?

    Heisey, Frazier, Chapman to Atlanta for Prado and JJ?

    I know both are going to get expensive the next 2 years, but if the Reds could afford it, it also assures them on the same team with Votto the next 2 years.

    If there was a shred of truth to the rumor of Atlanta's interest in Adam Jones what could Stubbs bring?

  10. #984
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    For me, it's kinda weird. I guess since Brandon is the longest tenured Red, there is a part of me that kinda hopes he is a lifetime Red.

    On the other hand, I realize the Reds are small market and factoring in his age, they should probably trade him and get something for him now before he is an anchor on the team payroll.

    It's really a tough decision for me.

  11. #985
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Double post. N/M

  12. #986
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Why is everyone wringing hands over Cordero or Madsen?

    Didn't the Reds JUST trade for Marshall? doesn't he clearly have CLOSER stuff? Do these same Reds not also have Arredondo, Bray and LeCure, three guys that can get K's in bunches?

    Closer is not an issue, at least not to me.

    LF, now that might finally be an issue. BP at leadoff and Heisey hitting second with Stubbs down around 7th. This interests me greatly.

    If the Reds shell out for Cordero, I'll not be surprised. But i won't like it.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  13. #987
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    Why is everyone wringing hands over Cordero or Madsen?

    Didn't the Reds JUST trade for Marshall? doesn't he clearly have CLOSER stuff? Do these same Reds not also have Arredondo, Bray and LeCure, three guys that can get K's in bunches?

    Closer is not an issue, at least not to me.

    LF, now that might finally be an issue. BP at leadoff and Heisey hitting second with Stubbs down around 7th. This interests me greatly.

    If the Reds shell out for Cordero, I'll not be surprised. But i won't like it.
    Because the Reds don't want to use Marshall as a closer and are clearly going for an established closer.

  14. #988
    Member Ron Madden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    22,124

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    Because the Reds don't want to use Marshall as a closer and are clearly going for an established closer.
    I think you may be right but it doesn't make sense to me.

  15. #989
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Madden View Post
    I think you may be right but it doesn't make sense to me.
    I don't get it either.

  16. #990
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,531

    Re: Reds Hot Stove Rumors (Discussion)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Madden View Post
    I think you may be right but it doesn't make sense to me.
    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I don't get it either.
    I get it, but think it's silly and avoidable.

    Because of the stupid save stat, teams now need two different pitchers at the end of games. One to get the tough outs in high leverage situations, and one to get the final three outs of a victory.

    You're right that it doesn't make much sense, but as long as the save stat is defined as it is, and drives pitchers salaries the way it does, that is the way teams will build their bullpens.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator