Turn Off Ads?
Page 47 of 66 FirstFirst ... 3743444546474849505157 ... LastLast
Results 691 to 705 of 984

Thread: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

  1. #691
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,681

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Back to the game, 104 yds in the first half ain't going to get it done. Gruden needs to open this thing up a bit. No running game is killing us.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #692
    Member forfreelin04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Zanesville, OH
    Posts
    1,318

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
    Well gosh, the Bengals beat the Bills, who lost to the Chiefs, who beat the Packers. I guess the Bengals could beat Green Bay lol....
    You really need a win to start the New Year don't ya?

  4. #693
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    34,888

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
    They lost all three games. They have lost each and every game they have played against a playoff caliber team.

    Somebody suggested here they could beat the Patriots. Still think so?
    Yes, they lost all of those games, but they had a chance to win several of them. That tells me that they COULD win such a game. They also beat the Titans, who may wind up in the playoffs.

    I never thought they were going to beat the Patriots. But could they? Sure. Anything could happen. The Seattle Seahawks went to the NFC championship a few seasons ago with a losing record.

  5. #694
    15 game winner Danny Serafini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sultanes de Monterrey
    Posts
    4,183

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Raiders got into FG range but the receiver failed to get out of bounds and time ran out. 24-13 Chargers at the half.

  6. #695
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,681

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
    Well gosh, the Bengals beat the Bills, who lost to the Chiefs, who beat the Packers. I guess the Bengals could beat Green Bay lol....
    I am always a polite poster, and don't appreciate the baiting you are doing right now. Sorry Dom, not going to bite.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  7. #696
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    Posts
    8,066

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    I'm with Dom and, frankly, while this team has made some strides, they have a lot of work to do over the winter.

    They had their goal clearly spelled out and, for the first half, they failed.

    Rem
    "For Reds fans, by Reds fans" Learn it, love it, live it.

  8. #697
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,681

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Skuta's in for Lawson?
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  9. #698
    Member forfreelin04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Zanesville, OH
    Posts
    1,318

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Even if they back in, I think we can agree they could beat the Texans.

  10. #699
    Potential Lunch Winner Dom Heffner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,003

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by forfreelin04 View Post
    You really need a win to start the New Year don't ya?
    Relax. The Bengals will back in, lose next week, and then everybody can give their "We've been to the playoffs three times in the past five years" speech to defend the family business.

    I hate to sound like that, but it gets really old, don't ya think? Supporting a crappy product?
    If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg

  11. #700
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    34,888

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
    Relax. The Bengals will back in, lose next week, and then everybody can give their "We've been to the playoffs three times in the past five years" speech to defend the family business.

    I hate to sound like that, but it gets really old, don't ya think? Supporting a crappy product?
    I can't believe I am about to defend Mike Brown's product, but I think a lot of teams would suggest three playoff appearances in five years isn't a crappy product. Only one team wins it all every year.

  12. #701
    Potential Lunch Winner Dom Heffner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,003

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by forfreelin04 View Post
    Even if they back in, I think we can agree they could beat the Texans.
    I don't mean to pick on you, but they lost to the Texans at home. You think they are going to go and win one after putting up three points at home in one of their more important games?

    Am I the only one who sees that they beat nobody this year? They are about the 15th best team in the league.
    If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg

  13. #702
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    34,888

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
    I don't mean to pick on you, but they lost to the Texans at home. You think they are going to go and win one after putting up three points at home in one of their more important games?

    Am I the only one who sees that they beat nobody this year? They are about the 15th best team in the league.
    So they are better than half of the league. And they beat 8 teams this year. In the NFL. This isn't college football. You win 9 games in the NFL and you certainly beat someone.

  14. #703
    15 game winner Danny Serafini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sultanes de Monterrey
    Posts
    4,183

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Chiefs muff a punt and Denver falls on it at the 20. They don't get any closer, but they do get the FG. 7-3 Chiefs

  15. #704
    Potential Lunch Winner Dom Heffner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,003

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I can't believe I am about to defend Mike Brown's product, but I think a lot of teams would suggest three playoff appearances in five years isn't a crappy product. Only one team wins it all every year.
    You seem to be mistaking playoff team for quality. If a team plays absolutely nobody, and gets in, are they really any good?

    Come on Doug, you are way too smart, my friend.

    If you make the playoffs with 9 wins and you beat absolutely no other playoff teams....what does that give you?
    If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg

  16. #705
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,324

    Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

    Offensive PI? This has gotten comical. These guys need to be investigated.
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25