Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Moderator Gallen5862's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Wilmington,NC
    Posts
    7,386

    Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...ticle_26059392


    Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft
    Small-market, low-revenue teams to get chance at extra picks

    The lottery, it seems, has been designed to help small-market and lowest-revenue clubs gain more talent not just because they had a poor season. Many of the smaller-market clubs were proponents of a system with hard slotting. While that hasn't happened, this current system is designed, with this lottery a part of it, to give those clubs a competitive advantage compared to the status quo.

    Teams eligible for '13 Lottery
    Arizona D-backs Baltimore Orioles
    Cleveland Indians Kansas City Royals
    Oakland Athletics Pittsburgh Pirates
    San Diego Padres Tampa Bay Rays
    Cincinnati Reds Colorado Rockies
    Miami Marlins Milwaukee Brewers
    St. Louis Cardinals


    There is one other lottery, one for picks forfeited by teams going over their allotted bonus pools. Any team going five to 10 percent over its pool gets taxed at 75 percent and loses a first-round pick. Anyone going 10-15 percent over gets hit with a 100-percent tax and loses a first- and second-round pick. Anything over 15 percent means a 100-percent tax and loss of first-round selections in the next two Drafts.

    Any of those forfeited picks would go into a separate lottery. Any team that did not exceed its pool will be in that lottery. In this one, though, the odds are not just based on winning percentage, but on a formula of revenue and winning percentage.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,406

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    First thought-how exactly does St. Louis qualify as a small-market or low-revenue team?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    3,515

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by AmarilloRed View Post
    First thought-how exactly does St. Louis qualify as a small-market or low-revenue team?
    St. Louis isn't much bigger than Cincinnati.

  4. #4
    Member Wheelhouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,252

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyHo4Life View Post
    St. Louis isn't much bigger than Cincinnati.
    They're just good.
    "Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,406

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyHo4Life View Post
    St. Louis isn't much bigger than Cincinnati.
    The city might not be, but they have a much bigger market out there. They're a midmarket team bordering on large. It's really a stretch putting them in the lottery with the smaller teams.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    3,515

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by AmarilloRed View Post
    The city might not be, but they have a much bigger market out there. They're a midmarket team bordering on large. It's really a stretch putting them in the lottery with the smaller teams.
    St. Louis isn't even close to a large market team. Baltimore is probably twice the size of St. Louis. Now they are a stretch.

  7. #7
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyHo4Life View Post
    St. Louis isn't even close to a large market team. Baltimore is probably twice the size of St. Louis. Now they are a stretch.
    Cardinals had the 11th highest payroll in baseball last season at $109M, ahead of the Dodgers. They have always had one of the most lucrative tv/radio deals in baseball, and have always been one of the richest franchises.

    If you give the Cardinals a lottery draft pick, you might as well as give the Dodgers a draft pick.

    Beyond absurd.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    Posts
    14,059

    Re: Competitive Balance Lottery to shake up Draft

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyHo4Life View Post
    St. Louis isn't even close to a large market team. Baltimore is probably twice the size of St. Louis. Now they are a stretch.
    You have to consider other variables.

    Baltimore's market base is saturated with other teams.

    Does St Louis have 4 other teams within 4 hour drive?

  9. #9
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    18,369

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    From what I've read, eligibility is the 10 smallest-market teams and the 10 lowest-revenue teams. Several teams are in both lists and are called crossover teams. Because of that, the final list is 13 teams.

    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/print.jsp?ym...nt_id=26059392

    These teams aren't eligible:

    AL East - Yankees, Red Sox, Toronto,
    NL East- Philly, Atlanta, Mets, Nationals
    AL Central - Detroit, White Sox, Twins
    NL Central - Cubs, Astros
    AL West - Texas, Angels, Mariners
    NL West - Giants, Dodgers,
    She used to wake me up with coffee ever morning

  10. #10
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    5,042

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    Same thing I'd read, Roy.

    I guess it depends on perspective. It seems absurd on its face to allow the World Series winner into a "competitive balance" lottery. At the same time, they are one of the ten smallest MLB markets. They do not have one of the ten lowest revenue streams. But if a team can raise its stature above its market due to smarts and winning, I guess I'd rather see that rewarded than punished. Odds are, I'd say Milwaukee is in the same place... and if we're lucky, one day Cincinnati will be.
    Reading comprehension is not just an ability, it's a choice

  11. #11
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    26,391

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    If the Cardinals are part of this lottery then they need to revamp their formula. A profitable team with a $109Mill payroll doesn't need MLB welfare.

  12. #12
    Maple SERP savafan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    18,441

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    So... wouldn't this basically be the same teams every year no matter what?
    My dad got to enjoy 3 Reds World Championships by the time he was my age. So far, I've only gotten to enjoy one. Step it up Redlegs!

  13. #13
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    5,042

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    Quote Originally Posted by savafan View Post
    So... wouldn't this basically be the same teams every year no matter what?
    The bottom ten markets should remain pretty static. The bottom ten revenue teams could fluctuate more. Since it's an "or" qualifier, the number of teams in the lottery can differ from year to year.
    Reading comprehension is not just an ability, it's a choice

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    13,749

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    Why not have two leagues - a small market league and a big market league?

    National (small market) League

    EAST
    Atlanta
    Florida
    Tampa
    Toronto
    Baltimore

    CENTRAL
    Cincinnati
    Milwaukee
    Pittsburgh
    Detroit
    Cleveland

    WEST
    Colorado
    San Diego
    Oakland
    Kansas City
    Minnesota

    American (big market) League

    EAST
    NY Yankees
    NY Mets
    Boston
    Philadelphia
    Washington

    CENTRAL
    Chi White Sox
    Chi Cubs
    St. Louis
    Houston
    Texas

    WEST
    Seattle
    LA Angels
    LA Dodgers
    San Francisco
    Arizona
    Last edited by Benihana; 12-01-2011 at 03:26 PM.
    Go BLUE!!!

  15. #15
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Reds eligible for 2013 Competitive Balance Lottery picks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
    Why not have two leagues - a small market league and a big market league?

    National (small market) League

    EAST
    Tampa
    Toronto
    Baltimore
    Florida
    Atlanta

    CENTRAL
    Cincinnati
    Milwaukee
    Pittsburgh
    Detroit
    Cleveland


    WEST
    Oakland
    Kansas City
    Colorado
    San Diego
    Minnesota

    American (big market) League

    EAST
    NY Yankees
    NY Mets
    Boston
    Philadelphia
    Washington

    CENTRAL
    St. Louis
    Chi Cubs
    Chi White Sox
    Houston
    Texas

    WEST
    San Francisco
    LA Dodgers
    LA Angels
    Arizona
    Seattle
    I believe that has actually been discussed by MLB. I kinda like it, although I haven't really thought it through.

    Funny thing, there are almost as many contending teams in the small market league right now, as in the big market league.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator