http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/1...-gonzalez.html
Nationals loading up for an NL East run.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/1...-gonzalez.html
Nationals loading up for an NL East run.
you talk about over paying.....wow
Let the kids play!
I'm sure his really strikes fear into a division with the Phillies and Marlins. Pretty sure I wouldn't bankrupt the future at this point if I were the Nationals.
the #3,4 and 9 best prospects in the nationals minors according to baseball america plus another good pitcher probly in the top 15 with great control kind of like a travis wood type
Let the kids play!
The Latos and Gonzalez trades were eerily similar. I'd take Latos over Base On Balls Gonzalez any day of the week.
‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ Matthew 25:40
Why are they in such hurry? They gave up their three pitching prospects and a catching prospect for a pitcher. Does that make sense? We "overpaid" from a strength to acquire a weakness. They OVERPAID from a strength for a strength! That makes no sense especially when this isn't going to put them over the top. I thought the Nats GM was doing a great job until this trade; they were building a legit a pitching staff but blew it up for what would be their #2-3. That's a move I don't understand!
Can you imagine what the Athletics rotation would look like in 2-3 years:
Brett Anderson
Jarrod Parker
Sonny Gray
AJ Cole
Brad Peacock
Was following this trade on Twitter via Jim Bowden. I want to punch him in the face so badly. Jim Bowden=a$$ clown
Let's get weird!
(Referring to Jack Hannahan signing with a Korean team)
Since there are no teams on the moon, I guess South Korea's far enough from Cincinnati to satisfy me.
-RichRed
It's hard to see a deal like this go down and still argue that the Reds overpaid to get Latos. The Nats gave up their #3, #4 and #9 prospects to get a pitcher who isn't nearly as good as Latos and who will likely end up costing significantly more money because he is already arbitration eligible.
I can't see how this trade makes any sense for Washington, they're likely a couple years away from being a viable playoff team and the players they dealt would have been been ready to contribute by the time they're ready to compete.
Looking at this, I think we made out pretty well in the Latos trade. We traded mostly from our positions of excess (1B, C, fringe SP), and got a better pitcher for about the same value.
At the same time though, I think it's finally time to start calling the Nationals a dangerous team.
Consider this - perhaps Walt's overpayment for Latos set the market, so to say; every GM in baseball seeking proven pitching help is probably cursing his name.
“The crows seem to be calling my name,” thought Caw.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |