Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

  1. #1
    ZCTRMTP!!!!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,795

    Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    I was sitting here thinking about some of the teams that haven't been to the playoffs in a long while. And it seems there is a good chance that most of those same teams won't be going anytime soon. How could you be a fan of such a team, knowing that even before the season there was basically no chance of postseason play?

    Reds fans know.

    Here are a list of the teams with the longest playoff droughts.

    Code:
    Washington/Montreal - 30 years
    Kansas City - 26 years
    Pittsburgh - 19 years
    Toronto - 18 years
    Baltimore - 14 years
    Seattle 10 years
    It has been a decade or more for six of the thirty teams. Twenty percent of the teams in baseball haven't been to the playoffs in at least ten years. Is that good for baseball? I think that's a resounding no. Reds fans should be able to relate to long playoff droughts, having just endured a lengthy one themselves.

    My solution: If there are any teams out there that have experienced a 10-year dry playoff run, then those teams are eligible for the newly-created fifth playoff spot. If there is more than one team eligible in each league then the fifth-spot goes to the team with the longest dry spell.

    For example, at the end of the 2012 season the spots would go to Washington and Kansas City, if they did not otherwise qualify.

    If there are no teams that qualify then the fifth playoff spot goes to the team with the fifth best record. And I think this would be the case more often than not.

    Is this an ideal solution? Probably not. Is being a fan of a team that hasn't seen postseason play in up to three decades ideal? Definitely not.

    Personally, I think throwing teams a one-game playoff bone every ten years is the sporting thing to do.
    Last edited by texasdave; 01-25-2012 at 12:38 PM.
    Zero chance the Reds miss the playoffs!

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member Moosie52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    577

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    Ummm...Let's tank for the 5th spot!

  4. #3
    Member alett12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    694

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    On that list who has a legit shot at the playoffs? In my opinion and rather ironicaly the teams with the 3 longest are the ones who have the best shots especialy if the new wild card rules are implemented. The Nationals have a good young team but I'm not sure they are there yet but they probably will be next year. The Pirates I think are the Reds biggest competition in the central with the core group they have with Mcutchen, Alvarez (if he comes through), and their bullpen. The Royals I believe have one of the best young teams in baseball with the likes of Hosmer, Mostakus, Butler, Gordon, and Soria closing it out. Toronto and Baltimore have the same problem, they play in the best division in baseball behind the Yankees, Rays, and Red Soxs though they are both good young teams with studs like Adam Jones and Matt Weiters for Baltimore and for the Jays Lawrie and Bautista. The M's are just screwed, they have the worst hitters park in baseball and they can't hit to begin with for them the guys i'm watching are Jeuses Monetro, Hector Nuesi, and Dustin Ackley.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    West Central Ohio
    Posts
    218

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    I like the playoff discussion. You are definetely outside the box, but yeah, they need to do something. I don't like the one game playoff that is being proposed ( is it set in stone? ). Speaking of playoffs, how about adding a 5th AND a 6th team:

    1. Gets more teams in ( the better teams, not the teams mentioned above )
    2. 4 teams in each league play in two 3 game series, with the winners advancing
    3. Top 2 seeds get a bye
    4. In a 5 team playoff, there is a potential for 43 games - a 6 team playoff there would be a potential for 53 games ( more home games for lower seeds, a bye for the top teams)
    Pete Rose will be leaving the Montreal Expos to become player - manager for the Cincinnati Reds

  6. #5
    Member alett12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    694

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetLou1990 View Post
    I like the playoff discussion. You are definetely outside the box, but yeah, they need to do something. I don't like the one game playoff that is being proposed ( is it set in stone? ). Speaking of playoffs, how about adding a 5th AND a 6th team:

    1. Gets more teams in ( the better teams, not the teams mentioned above )
    2. 4 teams in each league play in two 3 game series, with the winners advancing
    3. Top 2 seeds get a bye
    4. In a 5 team playoff, there is a potential for 43 games - a 6 team playoff there would be a potential for 53 games ( more home games for lower seeds, a bye for the top teams)
    Personaly, I would love to see 4 teams tied with the same record for the wild card now, a play in game for the play offs would be great for the game.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    931

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    The last thing we need is to give those teams even less reason to spend money and try to make the playoffs.

    10 years is honestly not that long of a time anyway. The top 3 I have NO sympathy for because they rarely if ever invest in improving their fate.

  8. #7
    Member alett12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    694

    Re: Playoffs - Thinking Way Outside the Box

    Quote Originally Posted by swaisuc View Post
    The last thing we need is to give those teams even less reason to spend money and try to make the playoffs.

    10 years is honestly not that long of a time anyway. The top 3 I have NO sympathy for because they rarely if ever invest in improving their fate.
    Neither do the reds for that matter


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25