I give Bailey 3 more starts. If he doesn't have at least 2 quality starts, he is out of the rotation, which he was lucky to make in the first place.
I give Bailey 3 more starts. If he doesn't have at least 2 quality starts, he is out of the rotation, which he was lucky to make in the first place.
Go BLUE!!!
Just how did the "run prevention unit" -- other than Homer himself -- cause the four runs in the first inning tonight?
Homer allowed a walk and three homers.
Please explain how other members of the "run prevention unit" caused the four runs given up in inning one tonight. Thank you.
Would this be a good place to insert the overused "marathon, not a sprint" line?
That was just plain brutal all around.
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball.
https://www.amazon.com/Charles-DeMaris/e/B07BD4JBQB
Last edited by traderumor; 04-09-2012 at 10:35 PM.
"Rounding 3rd and heading for home, good night everybody"
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball.
https://www.amazon.com/Charles-DeMaris/e/B07BD4JBQB
It's the manager's fault for leaving him in too long.
It's unbelievable how many overreactions there are here after ONE start in a young season.
I'm no Homer apologist. I think he can be successful if he's healthy, but he hasn't proven he can be. If he stinks up the joint for half the season, that's 1 thing. He hasn't done that yet.
I think it's a bit unfair to say people are overreacting to one start.
There was a healthy debate about Homer this spring. That debate was based on his historical numbers and his poor spring. Many folks, myself included, were and are skeptical that he can be a winning starting pitcher at this stage of his career. (My own concern is whether he has ever become fully healthy.)
Now, in his very first inning, he gets bombed. Three homers and four runs.
So folks are naturally unhappy and concerned. It's hard to be a ninety win team with ordinary (or worse) starting pitchers.
Of course, he will get more opportunities. But after the long debate about Homer, it was disheartening to see him begin the year reflecting previous issues with his pitching.
I expect him to continue doing what he's been doing. Hopefully Chapman bumps him and the charade ends when the bullpen is full strength. Cueto/Latos/Chapman/Leake/Arroyo can probably get it done. Throw Bailey in there for Chapman and suddenly you have a rotation with 2 marginal number 5's. I don't think that will be enough to overtake St. Louis and Milwaukee.
Last edited by traderumor; 04-09-2012 at 11:27 PM.
"Rounding 3rd and heading for home, good night everybody"
Here's a hypothetical question. You agree with a post saying that Homer should get half a season to prove himself.
What if Homer - or Arroyo for that matter - has say 7 bad starts in a row.
Would you still give each of them half a season?
Just testing your hypothesis.
After the first he pitched well. I was at the game and watched batting practice. The wind was actually blowing in during the Cards BP. Maybe 3 balls were hit out. The ball died in the wind. But no lie when the Cards batted the wind was actually blowing out. When the Reds came to bat in the bottoms of the first the flags were not moving.
Strange yes indeed.
Taylor High School
Home of the "Yellow Jackets"
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |