Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Rojo was there first

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    10,394

    Rojo was there first

    Why moving to New York would be good for the Oakland A’s, and good for baseball.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/sports...gin_redirect=0


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Rojo was there first

    I don't think Brooklyn or Long Island would work, especially Long Island. Long Island is a real pain for people who live in NYC to get to. Besides, those people are already diehard Yankees or Mets fans. Even when the Mets are great, they have a hard time filling the seats. They do well because of the revenue streams, but there aren't many people in the seats.

    New Jersey could work though. Even though most people in Jersey are Yankees or Mets fans as well, I don't think the passion is the same. If they put the stadium in the sports complex in East Rutherford, it could work. I still think they'd struggle to fill seats, but it would be better than Oakland I guess.

  4. #3
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,142

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Wouldn't this just give the Giants the largest 1 team market in baseball?

    Seems to be Bud is just going to force the A's to stay put, which is the worst move of all.
    Go Gators!

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,510

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Quote Originally Posted by fearofpopvol1 View Post
    I don't think Brooklyn or Long Island would work, especially Long Island. Long Island is a real pain for people who live in NYC to get to. Besides, those people are already diehard Yankees or Mets fans. Even when the Mets are great, they have a hard time filling the seats. They do well because of the revenue streams, but there aren't many people in the seats.

    New Jersey could work though. Even though most people in Jersey are Yankees or Mets fans as well, I don't think the passion is the same. If they put the stadium in the sports complex in East Rutherford, it could work. I still think they'd struggle to fill seats, but it would be better than Oakland I guess.
    The Mets would NEVER allow a team on LI. Never. That's a huge part of the Mets' fan base.

  6. #5
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Athens, OH
    Posts
    13,572

    Re: Rojo was there first

    I've said for years that the 8,000,000+ population of the #1 TV market is big enough to support a third and a fourth MLB team. 3 teams seem to be able to coexist there in the NHL.
    /r/reds

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    10,394

    Re: Rojo was there first

    FTR, I never advocated moving the A's. I think they could work if they got a new park, even if it's in Oakland. The current one is awful and in an awful part of town.

    My recommendation is to put a team in Connecticut, cutting into the base of the Yanks and Sox. That rivalry is the main engine of salary escalation.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    10,394

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    I've said for years that the 8,000,000+ population of the #1 TV market is big enough to support a third and a fourth MLB team. 3 teams seem to be able to coexist there in the NHL.
    And it supported three baseball teams for decades.

  9. #8
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,131

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Bring back the Philadelphia Athletics.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  10. #9
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Interesting. I think Lexington needs a team.

    Just kidding.

  11. #10
    Member Topcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,935

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo View Post
    Why moving to New York would be good for the Oakland A’s, and good for baseball.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/sports...gin_redirect=0

    Fantastic article Rojo but no way the Yankees or Mets would allow it, in the end The Giants come across as the bad guy for not allowing the team in Oakland to move and grow baseball in a very profitable market. My idea is funnel funds to the Giants on a percentage basis per season
    2006 Redzone mock Draftee's- 1(st) Daniel Bard(redsox), 1(st sup)( Jordan Walden (Angels), 2(nd) rd.- Zach Britton(Orioles), 3(rd) Blair Erickson(Cardinals), 3(rd) Tim Norton( Yankees),(cuz its a Tim Hortons thing

    Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    I've said for years that the 8,000,000+ population of the #1 TV market is big enough to support a third and a fourth MLB team. 3 teams seem to be able to coexist there in the NHL.
    Do the Islanders actually count as a NHL team? haha

  13. #12
    Are we not men? Yachtzee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Rubber City
    Posts
    7,413

    Re: Rojo was there first

    Quote Originally Posted by Topcat View Post
    Fantastic article Rojo but no way the Yankees or Mets would allow it, in the end The Giants come across as the bad guy for not allowing the team in Oakland to move and grow baseball in a very profitable market. My idea is funnel funds to the Giants on a percentage basis per season
    Why should the A's pay anything to the Giants, who only got San Jose in a boondoggle when they were threatening to move out of San Francisco if they didn't get a new stadium? Why did MLB have to buy of Peter Angelos to let the Expos move to Washington? If the current owners of the team deserve anything, it's maybe a one-time payout to counter any possible decrease in the value of the team, which will inevitably rise again. But I don't think a smaller market team should be paying a bigger market team anything. If the A's moved to San Jose, they'd likely still need every bit of revenue they could muster to compete with the big boys.

    My feeling is that MLB should let the A's move to San Jose or NYC or wherever and tell the Giants or the Yankees and Mets to deal with it. I'm tired of owners with outsized market areas using their "territorial rights" to gain huge advantages in revenues and preventing other teams from sharing in the pie. If I were commissioner, I'd tell teams like the Giants, Yankees, and Mets to either accept another team in their "territory" or accept full revenue sharing of all media, including local tv and radio broadcast rights. The only reason these teams have advantages in revenue streams is due to MLB "territorial rights."

    I think NYC could support a third or even fourth team. Put a team in Manhattan or Brooklyn and fans will flock to it as the team of "their" borough. Put another team in New Jersey. Much better than trying to move a struggling team from one small market to another like Las Vegas, which will probably be a ghost town in 30-50 years when they run out of water.
    Wear gaudy colors, or avoid display. Lay a million eggs or give birth to one. The fittest shall survive, yet the unfit may live. Be like your ancestors or be different. We must repeat!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator