Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Matt Garza?

  1. #1
    Member Trajinous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,067

    Matt Garza?

    mlbtraderumors.com listed the Reds as interested in Garza. That makes no sense to me, we need another bat that can play LF.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member P.E.R#14's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    248

    Re: Matt Garza?

    What's his career batting average? He's pretty athletic and I'm willing to bet he played outfield in High School.


    Go Reds!!
    "I'd walk through hell in a gasoline suit to play baseball." - Pete Rose

  4. #3
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    865

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trajinous View Post
    mlbtraderumors.com listed the Reds as interested in Garza. That makes no sense to me, we need another bat that can play LF.
    IF... and this is an enormous IF... the Reds wanted to target a starting pitcher for the rotation for years to come, you would have to open up a spot in the rotation for that to happen. You would have the potential to trade whatever incumbent's spot is being taken, then. (Bailey or Leake)

    For the type of bench improvement the Reds might be looking for, a Bailey and especially a Leake would go a long way in securing another bat. (and maybe then some)

    All that said, don't see a move like that or Greinke happening because of the cost that would be required to retain them going forward.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trajinous View Post
    mlbtraderumors.com listed the Reds as interested in Garza. That makes no sense to me, we need another bat that can play LF.
    Only makes sense if they would then use say Homer or Leake as trade for a bat..

  6. #5
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    865

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    Only makes sense if they would then use say Homer or Leake as trade for a bat..
    Yep.

    I do think it's interesting that this is the second top-tier starting pitcher the Redlegs have been tied to as a potential trade target. Again, I think it'd be tough to pull off... Will just be curious if that continues to be a trend in the rumors.

  7. #6
    Member Trajinous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,067

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Bailey or Leake, who would you trade for a bat?

  8. #7
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    865

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trajinous View Post
    Bailey or Leake, who would you trade for a bat?
    All about who you're getting in return. I think Leake has more value at this point, but that could maybe be argued.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    404

    Re: Matt Garza?

    Sorry,but the Reds should have no interest in Garza. Waste of time and prospects. The Reds don't need to mess around with the rotation. They already have that down which Garza provides little if no upgrade(especially if Bailey's mechanics are the issue and he works it out). The Phillies made the mistake many on this site are making. Stop overvaluing starting pitching when your pen and offense are soft.

    They need bats and another power arm in the pen. Bailey has little value to the offseason at least and Leake is to cheap for the Reds to deal. Move your prospects for bats and bats only.
    Last edited by The Rage; 07-06-2012 at 07:10 PM.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    341

    Re: Matt Garza?

    If you've got great starting pitching, you've got a chance. You cannot be disappointed with how the Reds have performed thus far this season.

  11. #10
    Member MBZags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    278

    Re: Matt Garza?

    I'd bet the Reds were there more for advanced scouting than for trade interest.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator