Turn Off Ads?
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 106 to 111 of 111

Thread: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

  1. #106
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,370

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt700wlw View Post
    I love how Dusty referenced Edwin figuring it out as a comparison for Stubbs at the end of the article. Truth is, Edwin only figured it out after he left the Reds-the same might be true for Stubbs.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #107
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    13,870

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    BB/K rate is a decent measure of plate discipline. Walks compared to strikeouts. Higher number is better, more walks, fewer Ks. In considering Heisey's long-term role, keep these 2012 K/BB stats in mind:

    Hanigan 1.18
    Votto 1.09
    Prince Fielder 1.00
    EE .85
    Pujois .70
    J. Upton .50
    ARod .44
    Bruce .43
    Phillips .38
    Cozart .28
    Stubbs .28
    Valdez .21
    Heisey .18

  4. #108
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    Chris Heisey's September
    Code:
                                                                                                                       
    Split       G GS PA AB R  H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO   BA  OBP  SLG  OPS TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB ROE BAbip tOPS+ sOPS+
    Sept/Oct   20 13 65 55 8 10  1  1  1   2  0  0  6 15 .182 .297 .291 .588 16   1   3  1  0   0   2  .231    66    65
    Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
    Generated 10/1/2012.

    Drew Stubbs is even more abhorrent.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  5. #109
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,431

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    Did anybody else find it interesting Frazier was in RF yesterday and Heisey was in LF? Why wouldn't you play Heisey in RF where he has played more than Frazier? Am I reading too much into that?

    I kind of was hoping to see more of Phipps after he went yards against LA, but I know that was a reach.
    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Let's face it, you mis-hit the bun with the mustard squirter, no one will really care.

  6. #110
    No half measures, Walter RedEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    8,213

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    Did anybody else find it interesting Frazier was in RF yesterday and Heisey was in LF? Why wouldn't you play Heisey in RF where he has played more than Frazier? Am I reading too much into that?
    Not sure -- what exactly are you reading into it?
    "Iíll kind of have a foot on the back of my own butt. Thatís just how I do things.Ē -- Bryan Price, 10/22/2013

  7. #111
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,514

    Re: Is Heisey now the incumbent?

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    Did anybody else find it interesting Frazier was in RF yesterday and Heisey was in LF? Why wouldn't you play Heisey in RF where he has played more than Frazier? Am I reading too much into that?

    I kind of was hoping to see more of Phipps after he went yards against LA, but I know that was a reach.
    I think Ludwick was going to start in LF but I'm guessing they didn't want him to aggravate his groin on a wet field.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25