Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 48

Thread: Reds were the best team in baseball

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls Ohio
    Posts
    769

    Reds were the best team in baseball

    After watching the WS and playoffs there's no dount in my mind, but the best team doesnt always win. Votto being at 60% and Cueto going down doomed us and still should have won but lack of clutch hitting killed them.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    254

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by Maker_84 View Post
    After watching the WS and playoffs there's no dount in my mind, but the best team doesnt always win. Votto being at 60% and Cueto going down doomed us and still should have won but lack of clutch hitting killed them.
    Yup. Reds, Nationals, Yankees, Rangers, Athletics.

    All really great teams that should've moved farther. Makes the sting less..stingy i gues.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    The Nats had the best team running away. They had the most wins in baseball and had tons of guys miss time along the way.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Big Bear City, CA
    Posts
    551

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    The Reds were very good, but not the best. They were below average offensively and were extremely dependent on pitching. The loss of Cueto showed that in the playoffs. We knew we were in trouble because we didn't have anyone else to shut down the opposition. If one of our pitchers had a bad game, it was almost always a loss, because our hitting couldn't come from behind (except against very weak teams for the most part)

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls Ohio
    Posts
    769

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Sucks the Reds couldn't play in the AL during the playoffs, the NL keeps pulling away and getting better than them every season

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,174

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    The Giants came back and beat up the Reds and Cards after being down, and then swept the Tigers. I have to say the best team won.

    This season was special though, let's get 'em next year.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by Maker_84 View Post
    Sucks the Reds couldn't play in the AL during the playoffs, the NL keeps pulling away and getting better than them every season
    The NL had a .494 overall winning percentage this year and had a losing record for the 9th year in a row. Winning a best of 7 series in late October doesn't make your league better overall.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls Ohio
    Posts
    769

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by HometownHero View Post
    The NL had a .494 overall winning percentage this year and had a losing record for the 9th year in a row. Winning a best of 7 series in late October doesn't make your league better overall.
    The bottom National League teams were terrible but the teams that actually matter (top 4 from each league) and the National League is at a huge advantage. There's a reason the NL is starting to dominate the All Star game and the WS

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by Maker_84 View Post
    The bottom National League teams were terrible but the teams that actually matter (top 4 from each league) and the National League is at a huge advantage. There's a reason the NL is starting to dominate the All Star game and the WS
    The top of the NL is better because they get to beat the bottom of the NL, from top to bottom the AL is a far better league. Two teams in the AL missed the playoffs this year that had better records than the NL 2nd WC team despite playing in the AL East and West where the last place teams would have a shot at a WC spot if they played in our Division.

    We won 97 games 22 of those were the Astros and Cubs in 31 games meaning we had just a .572 W% vs all other teams including a losing record in IL play, that percentage would put us 5th in AL. I'm sure those teams that missed the playoffs in the AL would have loved to get 31 games with the only two teams in baseball to lose 100 games. I know the Angels would have killed to get 15 games with the Cards and Brewers rather than having 19 with the Rangers and A's.

    The All Star game is meaningless with the way fans vote the least deserving players in and with so many elite players passing on the opportunity to play in it., The WS is a terrible way to judge since the best teams never win it anymore after moving to 8 and now 10 teams.

    The NL's 3rd best team beating the AL's 7th best team in a best of 7 series after 5 full days off tells us absolutely nothing.

  11. #10
    Pimpin...literally!!! dubc47834's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Terre Haute, In
    Posts
    1,475

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by HometownHero View Post
    The Nats had the best team running away. They had the most wins in baseball and had tons of guys miss time along the way.
    Sure they had the most wins....by 1 game, but that doesn't make them the best team. Also not running away with it either. Reds also had their best palyer down for 2 months of the season, lost the closer before the season even started, and lost their best pitcher 8 pitches into the post season. I dont understand why you are even on this forum. All you do is hate on the Reds, I really think you are a Cubs troll....for real dude!!!

  12. #11
    Pimpin...literally!!! dubc47834's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Terre Haute, In
    Posts
    1,475

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by HometownHero View Post
    The top of the NL is better because they get to beat the bottom of the NL, from top to bottom the AL is a far better league. Two teams in the AL missed the playoffs this year that had better records than the NL 2nd WC team despite playing in the AL East and West where the last place teams would have a shot at a WC spot if they played in our Division.

    We won 97 games 22 of those were the Astros and Cubs in 31 games meaning we had just a .572 W% vs all other teams including a losing record in IL play, that percentage would put us 5th in AL. I'm sure those teams that missed the playoffs in the AL would have loved to get 31 games with the only two teams in baseball to lose 100 games. I know the Angels would have killed to get 15 games with the Cards and Brewers rather than having 19 with the Rangers and A's.

    The All Star game is meaningless with the way fans vote the least deserving players in and with so many elite players passing on the opportunity to play in it., The WS is a terrible way to judge since the best teams never win it anymore after moving to 8 and now 10 teams.

    The NL's 3rd best team beating the AL's 7th best team in a best of 7 series after 5 full days off tells us absolutely nothing.
    Yeah....and how often does the best team in college basketball win the NCAA and that is lauded as the best post season running!!!

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    735

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    I don't know about the Reds being the best team in baseball, but with a couple of breaks, they could have been where the Giants are today. They should have put them away in game #3. That's the frustrating part for me. Good season, though. Greater expectations next year.

  14. #13
    13 Belongs in Cooperstown Captain13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    839

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by HometownHero View Post
    The top of the NL is better because they get to beat the bottom of the NL, from top to bottom the AL is a far better league. Two teams in the AL missed the playoffs this year that had better records than the NL 2nd WC team despite playing in the AL East and West where the last place teams would have a shot at a WC spot if they played in our Division.

    We won 97 games 22 of those were the Astros and Cubs in 31 games meaning we had just a .572 W% vs all other teams including a losing record in IL play, that percentage would put us 5th in AL. I'm sure those teams that missed the playoffs in the AL would have loved to get 31 games with the only two teams in baseball to lose 100 games. I know the Angels would have killed to get 15 games with the Cards and Brewers rather than having 19 with the Rangers and A's.

    The All Star game is meaningless with the way fans vote the least deserving players in and with so many elite players passing on the opportunity to play in it., The WS is a terrible way to judge since the best teams never win it anymore after moving to 8 and now 10 teams.

    The NL's 3rd best team beating the AL's 7th best team in a best of 7 series after 5 full days off tells us absolutely nothing.
    Maybe those teams lost 100 games because they had to play the Reds so much.
    What if this is as good as it gets?

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    I can't say that a team that had possibly the worst hitter in the majors (Stubbs) and a leadoff/2 hitter with the 7th worst OBP in the majors (Cozart) in their regular lineup the best team in baseball.

    Don't get me wrong, this is not a Dusty Baker bashing as there were not clear upgrades on the roster

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Reds were the best team in baseball

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain13 View Post
    Maybe those teams lost 100 games because they had to play the Reds so much.
    No they lost 100+ games because they had no talent, if you drop when they played each other 8-7 in Cubs favor they went 48-99 and 53-94 vs the rest of baseball.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25