Ludwick is also a big reason why we were still in the NLDS until the last pitch.
Ludwick is also a big reason why we were still in the NLDS until the last pitch.
The question with Ludwick is not if the Reds want him back, it's how much will they be willing to pay. For me, I go no more than 2 years with a team option for a 3rd and no more than $7-8M per year. Any more than that, I let him walk and look elsewhere
Say no to Ludwick.
Chances of repeating last year's production is not good.
The lost power from the lineup will be replaced by a full year of Frazier and a healthy Votto.
The money it will take to re-sign him would be much better spent on a high OBP outfielder to put at the top of the lineup.
The only way I would re-sign him is if I couldn't find the OBP outfielder.
He won't sign for just one year. And there's no way I can be convinced that he'll match even his career average slash line for the next 2 or 3 years. Frazier on the other hand is much more likely to match those numbers the next couple years.
That's why I'm saying that money would be a losing investment on Ludwick and they should use it instead for the real need - someone to sit at the top of the lineup and get on base in front of Votto. Votto will lead the league in RBI if he just has a couple average to above average on base guys in front of him.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |