Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: ESPN Trade Suggestion

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Stumbled upon this article. They have a blockbuster trade suggestion for the Reds. I think it would be insane...

    Reds Trade:
    Hamilton
    Mesoraco
    Leake
    Lecure
    Corcino

    Twins Trade:
    Span
    Willingham
    Carroll
    Daniel Santana

    http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/po...de-suggestions

    Span and/or Willingham are just not guys you trade your top prospect for under any circumstance, IMO

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Findlay, OH
    Posts
    450

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    Stumbled upon this article. They have a blockbuster trade suggestion for the Reds. I think it would be insane...

    Reds Trade:
    Hamilton
    Mesoraco
    Leake
    Lecure
    Corcino

    Twins Trade:
    Span
    Willingham
    Carroll
    Daniel Santana

    http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/po...de-suggestions

    Span and/or Willingham are just not guys you trade your top prospect for under any circumstance, IMO
    Saw this on the ORG. Whichever writer suggested this should be fired, for they are too stupid to write about baseball. This would hurt our SP depth, our bullpen, rob of us of our catcher of the future, take away our top prospect and our top pitching prospect. All for 2 OK outfielders. Horrible.

  4. #3
    Member improbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    2,089

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    I read the article. The premise is that the Reds are in "win now" mode.
    Variatio delectat - Cicero

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Findlay, OH
    Posts
    450

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    It still doesn't make much sense in win now mode. The pitching is hurt almost as much as the lineup is improved. Willingham won't be any better than Ludwick was last year, so the only improvement would be at leadoff with Span. You can find a leadoff hitter for much cheaper than the Herschell Walker package outlined in the article.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by drowg14 View Post
    It still doesn't make much sense in win now mode. The pitching is hurt almost as much as the lineup is improved. Willingham won't be any better than Ludwick was last year, so the only improvement would be at leadoff with Span. You can find a leadoff hitter for much cheaper than the Herschell Walker package outlined in the article.
    Not to mention the money. You are sending out about $2M in major league contracts and absorbing $15.5M in major league contracts. I'm not sure the Reds have $13.5M total this offseason to spend to address their current needs without creating new ones. They would need to sign another catcher because as much as I love Hanigan, he's not an every day guy. They would either need to sign a closer and move Chapman to the rotation or obtain another starter because it would not be smart to depend solely on Cingrani at the #5 spot. I would still consider the bench thin with the only improvement being the 39 year old Carroll over Valdez/Cairo. Just a bad trade all around

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    417

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    noway Hamilton is traded for anybody not named Stanton!!

  8. #7
    Moderator LexRedsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Greenville, South Carolina
    Posts
    559

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by drowg14 View Post
    Saw this on the ORG. Whichever writer suggested this should be fired, for they are too stupid to write about baseball. This would hurt our SP depth, our bullpen, rob of us of our catcher of the future, take away our top prospect and our top pitching prospect. All for 2 OK outfielders. Horrible.
    ...and we don't even trade any of our mediocre OFs, creating a nasty logjam

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    966

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    If the Reds were in win-now mode, they wouldn't have put Joey Votto under contract for 12 years. Not that this trade doesn't solve a lot of our issues around the diamond, but it leaves us with absolutely no depth in the minor league system and weak backups.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    This is easily the worst trade I've ever seen from someone getting paid to come up with it, and one of the worst I've seen in general by anyone. We would be taking on 15.5M and sending out 3 cheap MLB players as well as 2 of our best prospects.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Check this out...

    Here is a Twins fan forum who nearly unanimously think this trade makes no sense for the Reds... That's when you know it's bad

    http://twinsdaily.com/showthread.php...ade-Suggestion

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    3,293

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    I just lost any respect I may have had for ESPN for even thinking this.
    UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs
    57, 82, 93, 05, 09
    Go Heels!!!!!

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Weatherford, Texas
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by bounty37h View Post
    I just lost any respect I may have had for ESPN for even thinking this.
    Ditto.

    This is a complete JOKE of a Trade.

    Span isn't a STAR player or a STUD player... he is just a normal player. There would be absolutely no reason for giving up Billy Hamilton even with that package coming back from the Twins...

    I would trade Hamilton for ONE player only. Stanton of the Marlins. End of Story.

  14. #13
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    716

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    Stumbled upon this article. They have a blockbuster trade suggestion for the Reds. I think it would be insane...

    Reds Trade:
    Hamilton
    Mesoraco
    Leake
    Lecure
    Corcino

    Twins Trade:
    Span
    Willingham
    Carroll
    Daniel Santana

    http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/po...de-suggestions

    Span and/or Willingham are just not guys you trade your top prospect for under any circumstance, IMO
    Beyond value, I'm not sure I understand the good fit that the writer seems to think exists. Why would the Reds trade for a package that half of which involved two young shortstops?

    I actually like Span, Willingham and Carroll quite a bit. I actually think you'll see the Reds linked to Span again this offseason after all the noise this past trade deadline. But I'm not sure they would see the need to expand that trade into a blockbuster as the author suggests to address really one position improvement?
    Last edited by Larkin88; 11-27-2012 at 12:08 PM.

  15. #14
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    I would be surprised to see Mesoraco go anywhere. If Hanigan went down to injury who would catch if they had traded Mesoraco? He may have been in the doghouse at the end of this season. But he is still young, talented and cheap. No, he is staying in Cincy.
    A summer watching a bad Reds' team, is still a pretty good summer.

  16. #15
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    716

    Re: ESPN Trade Suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    I would be surprised to see Mesoraco go anywhere. If Hanigan went down to injury who would catch if they had traded Mesoraco? He may have been in the doghouse at the end of this season. But he is still young, talented and cheap. No, he is staying in Cincy.
    Big time agree with you there, Dave.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25