Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...n-broxton.html

    Between this and the signing of Todd Redmond to a major league contract, I'm wondering if there is a deal in the works for a starter and will be moving Chapman to the rotation

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Dangerous move but could have high upside if works but be a killer if it fails.

    If Chapman can become a top of the rotation starter, Broxton can match his 2012 season and we move a SP to fill another hole on the team we could well on our way to another runaway division winner but we could be hitting the bricks early if Broxton reverts back to 2010-2011 version and Chapman can't hold up to the innings and we deplete our SP depth.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Westside Cincinnati
    Posts
    73

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...n-broxton.html

    Between this and the signing of Todd Redmond to a major league contract, I'm wondering if there is a deal in the works for a starter and will be moving Chapman to the rotation
    Hopefully getting a decent deal for Upton or someone for Leake and others

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    721

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    I cannot put into words how scared I am of the Reds attempting to make Chapman a starter. I just cannot understand why anyone would think it's a good idea. In my mind it's not even a remote possibility.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by TSJ55 View Post
    I cannot put into words how scared I am of the Reds attempting to make Chapman a starter. I just cannot understand why anyone would think it's a good idea. In my mind it's not even a remote possibility.
    My personal choice would be for him to stay in the closer's role but I can definitely see the advantage of him being a starter. On one hand, there is the risk of injury, potential high pitch counts because of his wildness, ineffectiveness and even if he is good, the likelihood of being "Strasburg'd" late next season. On the other, if he's even 80% as dominant as he is as a closer, you have a top of the rotation arm. Those don't grow on trees

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Findlay, OH
    Posts
    450

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    My personal choice would be for him to stay in the closer's role but I can definitely see the advantage of him being a starter. On one hand, there is the risk of injury, potential high pitch counts because of his wildness, ineffectiveness and even if he is good, the likelihood of being "Strasburg'd" late next season. On the other, if he's even 80% as dominant as he is as a closer, you have a top of the rotation arm. Those don't grow on trees
    This is why I want the Reds to try the move. Aces are harder to find than closers. And while he is the most dominant closer, an ace is still more valuable.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    906

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    not to mention closers are the most over rated position in baseball.

    Or I mean the most misused position in baseball. For example chapman was worthless in the NLDS. They bring him in game 1 w/ a 4 run lead when anyone could close that out.

    They dont bring him the 5th inning of a 2-0 game 5 w/ the bases loaded and the MVP at the plate.

    Which situation is more important for chapman to be in? A meaningless 4 run save in the 9th or when the season is on the line in the 5th? And every manager does this too and its infuriating.

  9. #8
    Member VirginiaPreps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    10

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Fay just tweeted that Broxton's agent said deal not done, but substanial work as been done. Could come together quickly.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Big Bear City, CA
    Posts
    554

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    I don't mind Broxton, even though I wasn't thrilled when they got him. He did a good job for us in a setup role. He needs to stay there with Chapman closing. There is no way I would start Chapman. His control was/is not good. He couldn't get his breaking pitch even close to the plate at all. He wouldn't survive starting with one pitch. As a starter he would have to keep his fastball in the mid 90's. Major league hitters will hit those fastballs a long way. Not to mention his mental condition after he fails as a starter. Then his arm/shoulder fatigue. Throwing one inning 3 days in a row at the most, compared to several innings every 5 days. There is no comparison. IMO, he is not cut out to be a starter.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    750

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Could be keeping Broxton in the setup role. They locked up Marshall last year, much the same way. Kind of a backup plan in case Chapman doesn't succeed with the change to starting?

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    721

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by 40YrRedsFan View Post
    He needs to stay there with Chapman closing. There is no way I would start Chapman. His control was/is not good. He couldn't get his breaking pitch even close to the plate at all. He wouldn't survive starting with one pitch. As a starter he would have to keep his fastball in the mid 90's. Not to mention his mental condition after he fails as a starter. Then his arm/shoulder fatigue. Throwing one inning 3 days in a row at the most, compared to several innings every 5 days. There is no comparison. IMO, he is not cut out to be a starter.
    I agree. Most explicitly the parts about Chaps head. Dude is simply not smart enough to be a starter. I've seen nothing that leads me to believe he's more pitcher than thrower.

  13. #12
    Gary Redus Ruled
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Albion NY
    Posts
    461

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Id rather have Soria and Hoover backing him up.
    Hoping for another Reds October

  14. #13
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,806

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    It looks as if Madson won't be back. That was probably a long shot anyway.

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...ring-deal.html
    A summer watching a bad Reds' team, is still a pretty good summer.

  15. #14
    Member Larkin88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    646

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by panzecaz03 View Post
    Hopefully getting a decent deal for Upton or someone for Leake and others
    I'm still not convinced a conversation with Minnesota isn't revisited regarding Span. That whole sequence of events at the trade deadline was just too weird and I am a subscriber to the "where there's smoke, there's fire" idea... even if it takes a while to come to fruition.

    Of course, I'm wrong all the time.

  16. #15
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,806

    Re: Reds in Serious Talks with Broxton

    Quote Originally Posted by Larkin88 View Post
    I'm still not convinced a conversation with Minnesota isn't revisited regarding Span. That whole sequence of events at the trade deadline was just too weird and I am a subscriber to the "where there's smoke, there's fire" idea... even if it takes a while to come to fruition.

    Of course, I'm wrong all the time.
    I saw a recent pic of Denard Span and it looks like he put on quite a bit of weight. Looks like he could cover center field standing still. I think he is considering changing his name to Denard Spandex. LOL.

    In all seriousness, is Span an upgrade over Stubbs?
    Last edited by texasdave; 11-27-2012 at 11:45 AM.
    A summer watching a bad Reds' team, is still a pretty good summer.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25