Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Kyuji Fujikawa

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Salukifan2
    Guest

    Kyuji Fujikawa

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...kyuji-fujikawa

    and the cubs have already started spending money that will almost definitely cost them. They are going to suck anyway for the next 3 years, why would they give a 30 yr old japanese closer that money when they could spend it on developing the team they want 2 to 3 years from now.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Findlay, OH
    Posts
    450

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by Brittingham.Sam View Post
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...kyuji-fujikawa

    and the cubs have already started spending money that will almost definitely cost them. They are going to suck anyway for the next 3 years, why would they give a 30 yr old japanese closer that money when they could spend it on developing the team they want 2 to 3 years from now.
    Because they are the cubs?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by Brittingham.Sam View Post
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...kyuji-fujikawa

    and the cubs have already started spending money that will almost definitely cost them. They are going to suck anyway for the next 3 years, why would they give a 30 yr old japanese closer that money when they could spend it on developing the team they want 2 to 3 years from now.
    That was a bit of a head scratcher to me as well. They only signed him for 2 years and like you said, they are not going to be good. They are shopping Soriano and Marmol at a minimum, so I'm not sure what they are trying to do there

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, OH
    Posts
    310

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Because they will trade Marmol this offseason for prospects or Dan Haren type. Then either at this deadline or the next they will flip Fujikawa to a possible contender for even better prospects. You have to remember that their farm system is horrible.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by dMaus14 View Post
    Because they will trade Marmol this offseason for prospects or Dan Haren type. Then either at this deadline or the next they will flip Fujikawa to a possible contender for even better prospects. You have to remember that their farm system is horrible.
    Seems like a high price to pay for the type of prospects you get for a relief pitcher

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, OH
    Posts
    310

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    Seems like a high price to pay for the type of prospects you get for a relief pitcher
    But money means nothing to them. They have a lot of it. What they need is prospects which is something money can't buy on the open market.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    492

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by dMaus14 View Post
    But money means nothing to them. They have a lot of it. What they need is prospects which is something money can't buy on the open market.
    If money means nothing to them and they have a ton of it, just sign good players

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
    If money means nothing to them and they have a ton of it, just sign good players
    Its not the time to add them they yet since they aren't ready to win even added 3 names. With the new draft rules the best way to rebuild is sign players to shot deals to build value and trade them, wait out all your bad contracts until you can eat a chunk and move them to get back prospects. Let your current ready prospect learn at the big league level mixed in with those guys and kill time to your high draft picks make it up the system.

    In a couple more years they will have a flock of top Prospects almost ready right behind the wave of new players they get from trades and have their current young players entering their prime and around a 100M to add star players with those guys.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    I think this is a great deal for them! He's getting less than the current closer money and if he can be half as good as he was in Japan he will be one of the most sought after trade candidate's this or next season. They have money to spend and with the new rules limiting draft spending they are putting that Cash into a player who can bring them back players to fill the system later when its time for them to win again.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, OH
    Posts
    310

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    They will trust me. He's doing what he did in Boston when they won the WS twice. You can sign big FA but if they get hurt you have to rely on your farm system. In 2007 they had 7 players minimally on their roster that performed (Youkilis, Pedroia, Buchholz, Ellsbury, Papelbon, Varitek, Lester), they also used their farm system to get Lowell and Beckett. Add in the signings of Ramirez, Schilling, Drew, and Matsuzaka - bam WS.

  11. #11
    Salukifan2
    Guest

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    I disagree with it on the principle that the cub fans deserve to be told straight by ownership how they plan to fix this team, and after the whole Fukudome thing failed for them i don't think going out and spending a bunch of money on a japanese pitcher sends a message to the fans of, "We're trying to build from within this time." it means they are taking money away from player development and spending it on a risk, and Japanese pitchers are a huge risk. Darvish has been the most hyped so far, even more than Dice-k, and he was just average.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: Kyuji Fujikawa

    Quote Originally Posted by Brittingham.Sam View Post
    it means they are taking money away from player development
    They aren't doing this since the new rules limit what you can spend on the draft. Theo Epstein has build up his system by spending massive in the draft he can't do that any more so he's spending on players who he can trade to get prospects. They added this guy and also Scott Baker along with Scott Feldman on one year deals with the plan to eventually flip them all.

    Theo's and the Cubs grand plan to rebuild was ruined by the addition of draft pools. If they had unlimited spending they would have took Mark Appel this year but he would have killed all they had to spend on the other players. This year they got 7,933,900 to spend and went over as far as they could spending 8,307,700 before getting taxed and losing future draft picks.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25