Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Over-under for 2013?

  1. #1
    Member RedsBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    602

    Over-under for 2013?

    It gets me every time when I see reports about the Astros shopping for a DH. Keep forgetting they're heading to the AL.

    With that thought in mind (and those almost guaranteed victories), do you think the 2013 Reds meet, exceed or fall short of the win total from 2012?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    I have them at 95 wins. So just shy of last year's total. Although I think they will be a better team. I am not going to use the "L" word with respect to their 2012 victory total. But I believe it was the case.
    A summer watching a bad Reds' team, is still a pretty good summer.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    293

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    I think 95 wins is probably a good number. The offense is much improved, but the pitching will likely take a bit of a hit since the staff likely won't remain completely healthy for the entire year again.

  5. #4
    Custodial Engineer Bob Sheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    347

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Chapman is the big variable.

    If he excels in his new role as a starter, 95 wins seems attainable.

    If he struggles, it could cost the Reds the playoffs.
    "And why do false truths persist, getting passed down the decades as if they were fact? It comes back to the same point: People believe things that are wrong because, individually, people rarely investigate their own beliefs, particularly when what they believe makes sense intuitively. Even more so when those around them agree with them." -K.F.

  6. #5
    Member nheath22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    62

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha Zero View Post
    I think 95 wins is probably a good number. The offense is much improved, but the pitching will likely take a bit of a hit since the staff likely won't remain completely healthy for the entire year again.
    Regardless of health issues which are likely to occur at some point, I think our pitching will regress more because of Arroyo. While he has been a consistent force for us over the past several years, he is bound for some regression after the stellar season he put together in 2012. While I hope that I am wrong and he remains in the same form as last season, I would expect him to fall back towards his career average of around 4.3 ERA rather than the 3.7 he put together in 12', which probably loses a few more games for us.

    We also have to expect Chapman to have some ups and downs during his first year as a starter. Even in a best case scenario, he will have some bad starts as any first year starter has. We should mainly be hoping he pulls it together towards the end of the season like Latos did last year to be a force in the playoffs.

    Because of these two factors, I think our starters regress some in terms of the regular season which puts us in the 91 or 92 win range, and will hopefully be good enough to take another NL Central title. I think we will be a better team that last year, but our record probably won't show it right away.
    "The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi

  7. #6
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    I think we will be a better team that last year, but our record probably won't show it right away.
    I hope I am wrong and this team tops the century mark. But I could not agree more strongly.
    A summer watching a bad Reds' team, is still a pretty good summer.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    West Central Ohio
    Posts
    223

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Whats the lowest number that we cn expect and whats the highest number that we can expect? I think the expectations are in the 88 ~ 98 range, so I'm going with 93, but def want to see the 95 ~ 98 range.
    Pete Rose will be leaving the Montreal Expos to become player - manager for the Cincinnati Reds

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    297

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    how does 162-0 sound? Cant be too far off

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    West Central Ohio
    Posts
    223

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Quote Originally Posted by coachpipe View Post
    how does 162-0 sound? Cant be too far off
    OK - we can go with that!
    Pete Rose will be leaving the Montreal Expos to become player - manager for the Cincinnati Reds

  11. #10
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    4,581
    91-93

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Big Bear City, CA
    Posts
    606

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Reds will win 90 games, no more. With only 3 games against the Astros instead of 15 or 16, having to play teams like the Angels (now with Hamilton), Rangers, etc, we won't win as many as last year. If Ludwick can't match last year's production, we could still have troubles offensively with our team's tendency to strike out. Even with Choo in the lineup, we still have offensive question marks regarding Frazier, Hanigan, Cozart.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Big Bear City, CA
    Posts
    606

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    In addition to my previous post, April 2013 could be a very tough month unless we come out of the gate smoking. Angels for 3, Nationals for 7, Cardinals for 5, Phillies for 3, Pirates for 3. A very tough start to the season.

  14. #13
    Member RedsBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    602

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Quote Originally Posted by 40YrRedsFan View Post
    Reds will win 90 games, no more. With only 3 games against the Astros instead of 15 or 16, having to play teams like the Angels (now with Hamilton), Rangers, etc, we won't win as many as last year. If Ludwick can't match last year's production, we could still have troubles offensively with our team's tendency to strike out. Even with Choo in the lineup, we still have offensive question marks regarding Frazier, Hanigan, Cozart.
    I think Frazier will be an unknown. I believe Hanigan will have a similar year to the one he had in 2012....with, hopefully, a little more pop.

    I believe Cozart will have a better year in 2013. Hopefully being down the line-up will help him be a little more relaxed at the plate, feeling less pressure. Here's hoping he can improve his numbers even 10%, which would give him a slash of .271/.317/.756. If he can hover around his HR total of 15 - 20 and increase his RBI production to 50 - 60, I would call that a successful year. I think he's got it in him.

  15. #14
    Moderator LexRedsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Greenville, South Carolina
    Posts
    559

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    Quote Originally Posted by 40YrRedsFan View Post
    Nationals for 7
    Second straight year, no? I hate getting the season series out of the way SO early.

  16. #15
    JoeyBats19 Spider Tre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    166

    Re: Over-under for 2013?

    i'd say 92 or 93 wins
    Reds record when attended in 2011: 0-1
    Reds record when attended in 2010: 1-0


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25