Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: Reds pursuing reliever Mike Gonzalez

  1. #46
    The rest is drama. marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    In the woods, with a shovel
    Posts
    5,187

    Re: Reds pursuing reliever Mike Gonzalez

    I have it on good authority that Gonzalez decided not to sign with the Reds because he would have been embarrassed to wear the new road batting practice caps.




    otoh, he really liked the old school hidden "mb" on the Brewers' alternate caps.



    The same issue kept him from signing back with the Braves.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #47
    Party like it's 1990 Blitz Dorsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,716

    Re: Reds pursuing reliever Mike Gonzalez

    I'm surprised Gonzalez didn't command more money, especially with at least 3 teams after his services. 1-year, $2.25 million? Sure wish we would have matched that or offered him $2.5 million. It seems the only piece missing is a lefty out of the pen and that's a small price to pay. Average salary for an MLB player last year was $3.2 million (for reference).

  4. #48
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,943

    Re: Reds pursuing reliever Mike Gonzalez

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve4192 View Post
    I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice to add another lefty to the bullpen mix. I'm just saying it's not a huge need. They already have one of the best lefty relievers in the game (Marshall) and a couple of other very talented southpaws who may (or may not) play big roles in the 2013 bullpen (Chapman, Cingrani). The Reds have quality in-house solutions if the free agent market doesn't work out for them.
    Thing is, with Chapman in the rotation, the Reds have some questions in the pen. Broxton and Marshall are solid and I think Lecure could be ready for a bigger role. OTOH, Hoover is still unproven with some command issues and flyball tendencies and could be hit hard now that the league has seen him a bit. Masset is coming off a pretty serious arm problem. Ondrusek is a fringe guy. Simon had a career year at age 31 and is no sure thing to repeat. Arredondo walks the ballpark. I think the Reds need another guy with a track record. Getting one who is a lefty makes the most sense.

    Assuming Leake is the long reliever and Lecure, Marshall and Broxton are locks, the Reds need three more guys. I don't want three of those others on the roster. I'd go with Hoover and one of the others. The last spot would be for an addition or maybe Cingrani. Masset, Ondrusek, Simon and Arredondo should be fighting for one spot IMO.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25