True enough that the best team on paper doesn't always win. But, if given the choice, I would rather have the best team on paper heading into the season.Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank
True enough that the best team on paper doesn't always win. But, if given the choice, I would rather have the best team on paper heading into the season.
At first I wanted him, but what the Nationals are paying him is crazy.
Best to get it out of the way early. The Nats are gonna be a tough team to beat this year.
Ok you got me TexasDave. I admit that was just my gut feel without looking at the real numbers.
Anyway, counting on LaRoche, Werth, Zimmerman to continue producing just seems riskier than Votto, Bruce, Phillips. And the Reds offense gets immensely better this year replacing Stubbs with Choo and Rolen with Frazier, not to mention a full year of a healthy Joey Votto.
I like our new offense better than the Nats and I think we'll score more runs this year.
Guess I have to get to fifty posts.
They're definitely gonna be good but the Reds can beat them
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
