![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Latos / Bailey extension do you see before the season? | |||
| Neither |
|
17 | 21.52% |
| Both |
|
26 | 32.91% |
| Latos Only |
|
31 | 39.24% |
| Bailey Only |
|
5 | 6.33% |
| Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 374
|
Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I'm starting to question whether extending Bailey or Latos (let alone both) is going to happen before the season starts. What's your guess:
1. Neither 2. Both 3. Latos Only 4. Bailey Only With the influx of TV contract $$ I'm wondering if both if these guy's see contracts larger than what the Reds will offer? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I think neither is the most likely option at this point but I wouldn't be surprised with anything Walt could pull off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,910
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I'm wary of locking up a core, suffering some injuries and winding up with a full payroll and not enough talent. I'd take my chances year-to-year for at least one more year.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
Quote:
Here are the final years of team control for our staff: Cueto 2015 Latos 2015 Arroyo 2013 Bailey 2014 Chapman 2016 Leake 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
It would be nice to see how Chapman does before locking down Bailey. I would pull the trigger on Latos now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,219
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
My thoughts exactly. No need to rush. But if I had to pick one, it would definitely be Latos. He has the makings of a career horse.
__________________
"I talked to an advance scout that told me if Joey Votto and Albert Pujols were on the same team he'd advise his team to do the unthinkable...pitch around Votto to get to Pujols." - Buster Olney, ESPN |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I'm not getting a sense that either will get done, but we have until April for things to change. Of course the arb deadline is nearing as well, so maybe things will pick up. Bailey's shoulder still bothers me. I'd go year to year with him. Latos would be a great signing, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,781
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I'm guessing that they get something done with Latos (although maybe that's just wishful thinking).
Not so sure about Homer. He did have a great year last season.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,427
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I could see Latos happening. Put me in the camp that's a little wary about going long term with Homer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I suppose finding out if Chapman is an ace also helps the financial forecasting as well. In that case I think Latos may get a nice extension next season to make Chapman/Latos your rotation 2016+
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 367
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
You are already most likely going to get their best years under current contracts. Let someone else pay for the decline years and keep attempting to develop own talent on pitching end. Hitters seem to be more projectable so invest in that direction as they already have.
|
|
|
|
| Likes: |
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: huntington,wv
Posts: 526
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
I don't know if I agree with not locking up the best core . Isn't that like playing not to lose??
With Bailey,I don't see an agreeable medium,because of his mindset. Latos is very similar. Both seem very headstrong,I can relate to that attitude. I wonder how Cueto's contract plays into this.It might not bode well ,if there was much of a disparity in contracts. I don't think there will be much difference between the Latos and Bailey going forward,barring injuries. I might go as far as to predict Bailey the better pitcher. I like them both. As kbrake said,Walt seems full of surprises.
__________________
May the Father and Son bless Lyle |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
It's a matter of money, not philosophy. The Reds are not in a market where they have major contracts locked into a bunch of players. They need to replace expensive ones with young, cheap ones on a regular basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 374
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
That doesn't seem to be an issue to Walt and the FO as he has publicly stated he would like to lock both up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 61
|
Re: Bailey / Latos LTC ?
At this point I think we know in Latos we have an Ace in the making. I would like to see another year out of Homer before I would offer him a LTC. There have been a lot of guys who get rewarded after 1 good year and then never live up to the potential of the contract. It may cost us a few more dollars to make LTC later on, but I would rather be sure in what the Reds invest in.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |