![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 530
|
ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
on other board. we will be challenging for all time futility in strikeouts and fielding % this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Has big taste
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,704
|
Re: ESPN report: Reds get Womack for PTBNL
Um, he steals a lot of bases?
(I'm testing a new "find the bright side" approach. so may have to find a new team to support.)
__________________
There is no such thing as a pitching prospect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,416
|
Re: ESPN report: Reds get Womack for PTBNL
maybe if we're lucky the ptbnl will be homer bailey??
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 31
|
Re: ESPN report: Reds get Womack for PTBNL
Oh gross. Womack was one of the worst position players in baseball last year.
Even if we gave up nothing, we were just robbed. Last edited by swityak11; 12-08-2005 at 12:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 530
|
Re: ESPN report: Reds get Womack for PTBNL
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,918
|
Re: ESPN report: Reds get Womack for PTBNL
It's official, oh goodie.
![]() http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2252378 Quote:
__________________
Pessimists are well informed optimists |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,216
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
The only way this is a good deal is if it's a bluff to get Aurilia to reject arbitration since Womack would be his replacement. Then, after Aurilia rejects it, the Reds release Womack. But the Reds are too dumb to do that.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Quote:
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Little Reds BandWagon
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,244
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
The trade as just mentioned on MLB Radio says it's for TWO players to be announced.
__________________
"...You just have a wider lens than one game." --Former Reds GM Wayne Krivsky, on why he didn't fly Josh Hamilton to Colorado for one game. "...its money well-spent. Don't screw around with your freedom." --Roy Tucker, on why you need to lawyer up when you find yourself swimming with sharks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
A Lost Ball In High Weeds
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dunbar, WV
Posts: 630
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Just announced on MLB.com...Womack for 2 minor leaguers (not named)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Quote:
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
A Lost Ball In High Weeds
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dunbar, WV
Posts: 630
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Quote:
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 530
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,456
|
Re: ESPN: Reds trade for Womack
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?Why? Why? Why?Why? Why? Why?Why? Why? Why?Why? Why? Why?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |