![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,040
|
Reds ownership should step up in draft
Some highly rated player will fall because of salary demands or Boras factor. If this ownership is true to its word, and I hope they are, the Reds cannot skimp on its high draft choices this year. The team has underperformed; it didn't spend big in the off-season; the minor league system is the hope of the organization,
Reds have a number of high picks this year. They should go for the top available prospects. Fans are tired of compromise selections. Not saying any particular one was a compromise -- but we all know that, in the past, some have been. This off-season, I was hoping for another Harang/Arroyo type pitcher. Didn't happen. Owner says team not ready to spend on major free agents. Was very disheartened watching Lincecum the other night. Another electric arm passed by in the draft -- financial reasons again? Team needs to go for it in the draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 546
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
Quote:
There is a whole thread devoted to Lincecum so there really isn't a need to go into detail here but I think it's safe to say the Reds passed on him for reasons other than signability. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,127
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Yes, hopefully we see the last of punting picks and Mark Schramek's.
God, please give me a reason to have faith in this organization. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Just step up and make smart picks. I doubt the Reds took on extra picks unless they were willing to spend more on the draft. The only reason they got a extra pick in 2002, was because they passed on the 2001 pick. But if you think they can outspend the big boys, forgetaboutit.
This is the most picks the Reds have had this early since the Bronze age. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Go Reds Go!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,829
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Isn't that kind of what they tried when they drafted Espinoza and Sardinha and gave them big league contracts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
No, because those contracts were a sleight-of-hand in lieu of actually paying the required bonus.
I absolutely agree. If this franchise has the money to burn on guys like Stanton, it can budget a couple of million for the best of the best at 15, including any fallers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 379
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Has there been any indication of the current ownership not willing to draft a player due to money? I know several teams, not just the Reds, who passed on Boras clients, hopefully that won't be a factor for the Reds, but if it is, I don't think we will be the only ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,040
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
I really don't care what other teams do. The Reds may not be the "only ones" to pass on Boras clients, but no team suffers more from signability drafting. Gruler over Kazmir. The whole Sowers thing. The whole Espinoza/Sardhina thing. Arguably Stubbs/Lincecum. Schramek with a second round pick. See a pattern? If Mr. Castellini is truly interested in winning, he needs to show it in this draft. Reds with multiple high picks have a big opportunity. They don't sign premium free agents, they don't trade for star players. They don't compete for top international guys. They need to draft very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
I also wouldnt put Stubbs in the category with the other picks. If the Reds had passed on Stubbs, he was slated to go a few picks later, so its not like the Reds took a large leap of faith taking him.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,040
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
But it always seems like the Reds pass on the obvious, big name guys. And last year, while perhaps justifiable, was similar. For once, I'd like to see the Reds get the big, fancy name and let someone else argue that they got a "hidden gem." In terms of the first round pick, the only recent Reds GM with great success was DanO. He just nailed it with Bailey and Bruce. Not knocking Kriv's draft overall, but I want to see more Baileys and Bruces, and it is possible one can drop into the Reds' lap at 15 this year. If they are willing to pay the price for him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 546
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
Stubbs wasn't my pick but I think he's unfairly criticized and underrated by a lot of Reds fans. If he can hit for just a decent batting average he can be a special player and make a big contribution to this franchise. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,947
|
Re: Reds ownership should step up in draft
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |