![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Cruisin' for trouble
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 3,287
|
Bailey for Rios being discussed?
per mlbtraderumors:
Elliott also said the Reds are interested in Alex Rios. If the Giants are pondering sending Tim Lincecum to the Jays for him, I imagine the Reds would have to counter with Homer Bailey. Bailey, however, is less proven than Lincecum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
i have always liked Rios too, but to trade a young starter when we NEED starters doesnt make sense,, offer Hamilton straight up for him!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,668
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
That is a no-brainer, but ain't gonna happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
I doubt Toronto would prefer Bailey over Lincecum. It will probably take another prospect in addition to Bailey to trump the Giants offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Puffy 3:16
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Quote:
With that said, another prospect probably wouldn't be needed depending on how they value Bailey.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum." - - Rowdy Roddy Piper "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man" - - Fletch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 767
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Puffy 3:16
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Alex Rios is a stud. Bailey is a POTENTIAL stud.
With one you know what you are getting - offensive production. With the other you hope what you might get down the road - Ace pitcher. I would do it and then worry about trading away outfield parts to get pitching later. Rios is that good.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum." - - Rowdy Roddy Piper "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man" - - Fletch |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Love rumors that don't make sense.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,403
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Quote:
Also, who does he start in front of? It won't be Dunn or Griffey, regardless of what we think about those situations. Would he start over Josh Hamilton? As for Bailey, when did I bring him up at all in this thread?
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,403
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Quote:
Bailey? Ummm the title of this thread is pretty much the reason don't ya think? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Well, you quoted me then asked a question about Bailey as if I had brought him up.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,434
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
I wouldn't, becuase I wouldn't move Bruce for Bedard. I am not sure if I would move Bailey for Rios either, but that one I am willing to move a little bit with depending on what my scouts said. Bruce though, is untouchable if I am the GM.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |