RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-2008, 11:38 PM   #1
Matt700wlw
Making sense of it all
 
Matt700wlw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

NFL.com:

Cincinnati wide receiver Chad Johnson already has stated he does not plan to attend the Bengals' voluntary offseason conditioning program that starts Monday.

But he is not going to be alone.

Cincinnati’s other Pro Bowl wide receiver, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, also is expected to skip the start of the voluntary conditioning program for some of the same reasons Johnson is not attending.

It sets up one of the stickiest situations in the NFL, an issue that threatens to hang over the team until and through training camp.

Cincinnati has two Pro Bowl wide receivers, each of whom believes he is underpaid, each of whom wants a new deal, each of whom is expected to be absent from Paul Brown Stadium for the start of Monday’s offseason drills.

Houshmandzadeh is in the final year of four-year contract that is scheduled to pay him a base salary of $2.525 million. He failed to show up to the Bengals' offseason conditioning program last season and, without a new deal before this year’s offseason conditioning program, Houshmandzadeh is not about to attend now. It is the reason he is not expected Monday or anytime shortly thereafter.

Cincinnati already has wrestled with the best way to handle the Johnson situation; it has made it known to any team that calls the team that the Bengals will not, under any circumstance, trade Johnson. They refuse to 86 "85." So now the Bengals are assured of having at least one unhappy wide receiver.

The interesting part is, will they have two? Unlike Johnson, Houshmandzadeh never has had his deal restructured in Cincinnati. Unlike Johnson, who has three years left on his contract, Houshmandzadeh has only one.

If Cincinnati spends on any Pro Bowl wide receiver, it would seem that Houshmandzadeh has next.

But Houshmandzadeh and Johnson appear to have made their decision in regard to next week and this offseason. It’s up to the Bengals to make theirs.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Matt700wlw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2008, 11:41 PM   #2
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category



Awesome "team" we've got here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:03 AM   #3
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

I won't be losing any sleep over voluntary workouts.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

Last edited by KoryMac5; 03-20-2008 at 12:08 AM.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:06 AM   #4
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

deleted double post
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

Last edited by KoryMac5; 03-20-2008 at 12:07 AM. Reason: double
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:06 AM   #5
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

"Thrilled" with the Bengals?? Really??
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:07 AM   #6
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

We have become the fanbase of low expectations.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 07:58 AM   #7
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Ssssuper!

The Reds are predicted to be around a .500 club, yet I'm much more optimistic about them than I am with the Bengals.

The Bengals are a mess. A big one. They have so many holes, question marks, bad attitudes, the worst owner, a terrible coach, etc. Where do I stop? Besides Carson, is there anything to look forward to?

The next month or so could make or break the next few years in my opinion. They have to draft the right players. No RB's, WR's, etc. They have plenty, yet I see them drafting one or both of those positions in the first 3 rounds. If they do, expect this team to go back to their years of ineptitude.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 08:24 AM   #8
joshnky
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Didn't TJ skip voluntaries last year as well? Much ado about nothing, IMO.
joshnky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 08:25 AM   #9
joshnky
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt700wlw View Post
They refuse to 86 "85."
I bet the author felt pretty proud of himself in coming up with that line.
joshnky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 11:14 AM   #10
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

You've got to love non-guaranteed contracts -- everybody feels scared and looks out only for themselves...
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 06:32 PM   #11
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,627
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
You've got to love non-guaranteed contracts -- everybody feels scared and looks out only for themselves...
If they only applied to Juan Castro and Mike Stanton.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 03:59 PM   #12
Oxilon
Member
 
Oxilon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Voluntary works are garbage anyways, with the exception to rookies and other practice squad filler. I mean, Strahan missed out on everything, even most of preseason, and he only dominated like he usually does. CJ and TJ are both veterans who are Pro Bowl caliber players; they have the ability to turn the switch on when games actually matter.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
-Steve Stone
Oxilon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 04:05 PM   #13
BUTLER REDSFAN
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,195
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

I'm beginning to feel sorry for Carson Palmer--Yeah, he's rich but a career doomed for nothingness.
BUTLER REDSFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 07:26 PM   #14
GoReds33
The Future
 
GoReds33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,462
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUTLER REDSFAN View Post
I'm beginning to feel sorry for Carson Palmer--Yeah, he's rich but a career doomed for nothingness.
I don't feel sorry for him. The Bengals gave him a chance to compete, and he did his best. He was given two of the top recievers, and an above average running back. Even with that, the offense didn't score the points it was capable of. He underperformed this year, and that's one of the many reasons the Bengals aren't in the Super Bowl.
__________________
Quote:
If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
-LTlabner
GoReds33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 07:31 PM   #15
BUTLER REDSFAN
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,195
Re: TJ to join Chad in the "no show" category

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoReds33 View Post
I don't feel sorry for him. The Bengals gave him a chance to compete, and he did his best. He was given two of the top recievers, and an above average running back. Even with that, the offense didn't score the points it was capable of. He underperformed this year, and that's one of the many reasons the Bengals aren't in the Super Bowl.
I'm just talking about the self-absorbed morons he has to work with.
BUTLER REDSFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25