![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
|
Votto's Power Potential
A quick question/observation. I know a bunch of folks had some spirited discussions on what Votto's power potential might be in Cincy in the minor league forum last year and in this forum during spring training. I was on the side of 25-30 someday. I guess my wonder is this...does that 466 foot monster blast a few nights ago put people who were skeptical of his power potential more at ease? That's a massive shot for most humans, even most humans in the major leagues. Seems to me a guy with that kind of raw power can reach the seats fairly consistently.
I am also loving his approach at the plate right now. He goes with pitches very confidently, and is using the opposite field to great effect. We will see homeruns to left, shortly, I believe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,695
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
And, if he can reach those levels, it would be the first time the Reds have produced a 1b from the system to do that since, when? Tony Perez (and, yes, I realize he started out at 3b, but, since he ended up at 1b, I am counting it)? To be specific, annual 25-30 hr power from Votto would be nothing to be dismissive of, with an extra bonus of having actually been developed from within the system.
Is my mind blanking on another 1b who rose through the system with that kind of power in the last 40 or so years? (Not counting Casey and his one 25 hr season since he was acquired and didn't come through the system) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,529
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
The only other significant first baseman I can think of who came through the system was Driessen, and he never hit 20.
__________________
At the Edge of the Woods Preview Go to the edge of the cliff and jump off. Build your wings on the way down. --Ray Bradbury |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,985
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Nick Esasky hit 21 and 22 in 85 and 87. But he may not be considered that significant.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,663
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,273
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Lee May, signed by the Reds in 1961. 39 homers in 1971. A cornerstone of the trade with the Astros after the 1971 season. Not too shabby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
There it is, Lee May. Good call, knew I was blanking on somone.
So, Votto is potentially the first 1b since May to have the kind of power we associate with the position that has come up through the farm system. That covers 40+ years. Oof. And, helpful for quantifying what he may turn into. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Charlie Brown All-Star
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 4,681
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
If last year's MLB-wide home run dropoff wasn't a fluke, a legitimate 25-to-30 homer guy won't be anything to sneeze at. There were only a couple of dozen big-leaguers who hit 30 or more last year.
__________________
"I don't have a baseball team, I have a theological seminary." -- Charlie Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Danger is my business!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,907
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Quote:
If they started testing blood, we'd probably see it fall off a cliff.
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it." http://dalmady.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,665
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Here's an interesting question: Who has more power potential- Votto or Encarnacion?
I think they're both easily capable of hitting 30. I see Votto putting up Garret Atkins-type numbers (career .303 BA, 28 HR/year.) And I see Edwin as a slightly worse Aramis Ramirez (career .283 BA, 28 HR/year.)
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,695
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
I am excited about Votto and his potential. Is it too soon to be excited or am I setting myself up with a guy like Votto. Votto appears to be the answer that the Reds have needed for a long time at 1B and that we fans have yearned for.
I just hope he doesn’t flop later. I don’t think he will, am I wrong? Seems like a guy like Votto could take some of the burden off of Dunn and Griffey by producing when they are having their off days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
There were a total of 9 1B in MLB who hit 30+ HR last year. But I'd prefer to look at SLG. Below is all 1B who qualified for the batting title last year, sorted by slugging.
Code:
RK PLAYER TEAM SLG 1 Carlos Pena TAM 0.627 2 Prince Fielder MIL 0.618 3 Ryan Howard PHI 0.584 4 Albert Pujols STL 0.568 5 Mark Teixeira TEX/ATL 0.563 6 Derrek Lee CHC 0.513 7 Lance Berkman HOU 0.510 8 Carlos Guillen DET 0.502 9 Adrian Gonzalez SDG 0.502 10 Todd Helton COL 0.494 11 Justin Morneau MIN 0.492 12 Dmitri Young WAS 0.491 13 Paul Konerko CHW 0.490 14 Ryan Garko CLE 0.483 15 Casey Kotchman LAA 0.467 16 Adam LaRoche PIT 0.458 17 Kevin Youkilis BOS 0.453 18 Carlos Delgado NYM 0.448 19 Aubrey Huff BAL 0.442 20 Kevin Millar BAL 0.420 Here's are a few projections from PECOTA. Think of them as best case, likely, and worst case scenarios. 90th: 639 PA, .308/.388/.562, 39 2B, 33 HR Mean: 616 PA, .280/.360/.499, 33 2B, 27 HR 10th: 492 PA, .240/.321/.411, 22 2B, 17 HR Now consider that he's young and likely to improve. PECOTA has him around .285/.365/.510 with 30 HR through 2014. Obviously those projections will change baesd on what he does this year, but he looks like a keeper to me.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. Last edited by RedsManRick; 04-23-2008 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,692
|
Re: Votto's Power Potential
I see Votto as a 25-30 homerun guy and 30+ doubles. With his ability to hit to the other field with power and patient approach, he should be a perennial .300+ hitter with an OBP around .375+.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |