![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
From Fay today:
http://cincinnati.com/blogs/reds/201...y-start-game-4 Nix and Hanigan will definitely start tomorrow night and Dusty is considering starting Wood if there is a game 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,721
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
As long as Nix is in LF, not CF, I'm OK with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,628
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Haha, I didn't even consider that possibility until you said something. Thanks for letting that thought enter into my mind :thumbdown
Any ways, what does everyone think the line-up will look like tomorrow? Dusty will likely go with Phillips Cabrera Votto Rolen Bruce Nix Stubbs Hanigan Arroyo I would go with Stubbs Bruce Votto Rolen Nix Hanigan Phillips Janish Arroyo |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,211
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
"So Fla Red"
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,628
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 859
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Janish oughta be playing too
__________________
For Love of the Game "If you aren't first; you're last" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Worth The Wait
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,107
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
You can't have it both ways with Dusty, IMO.
I think the consensus is that he is a great team-builder/leader by deferring to vets and deftly managing ego's, psyche's, young players, etc... There were several times this season that the Reds could have gone south and I do believe that quality leadership was part of the reason we stayed the course. And leadership comes from the top....and it absolutely filters through Dusty. Therefore, I think we must accept that Dusty is going to be very slow to make any drastic changes involving those vets that he invests with leading the team. I don't think he could make a guy like OCab a focal point and then stick him on the bench come post-season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,022
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
I can't help but to agree completely.I get what everyone is saying about Dusty and the vets and Cabrera being a great clubhouse guy.It's just that Cabrera contributed nothing last night and certainly cost the team 3 runs.For a great leader his playoff track record is poor.
Say what you want about how great Halladay was last night, but even for the great ones it's much more difficult to pitch with a one run lead opposed to cruising thru almost the entire game with a 4 run lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,807
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,211
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,022
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
And it could've been prevented if he'd just paid better attention to Victorino after the double in the first. I'm not going to defend Volquez because he didn't throw strikes early in the count and got himself into trouble on his own.With some solid defense though, he could of lasted a few more innings(not sure that would have been all that great). Maybe I missed it, but I don't get how our starting SS could botch a fairly routine play that cost the Reds 3 runs in the Reds first playoff game in 15 year in witch only 4 runs total were scored and get a free pass around here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,807
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
I wonder how much his oblique caused him not to go to first. Either way, I think letting Halladay get a hit off you probably ranks up there as run causing plays. Walking ruiz didn't do any good either. Think what you wish, but what is more routine than OCs play is blowing the pitcher off the field, especially when some describe your "stuff" as being the best in the game. Add in the fact that Halladay played in the AL his whole career and it is a no brainer. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |