![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
2011/2012 UC Basketball official thread
The season starts tonight vs Mt. Saint Marrys at the Shoe. UC also has quietly put together a solid recruiting class for next year. Lets hope the Cats come together and have a good year. Lets get W number 1 tonight.
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Is there any heat on Mick Cronin's seat right now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Dead broke athletic department and absolutely no fan base left.
Basically nobody cares and the department doesn't have the financial ability to fire Mick. It's really sad and depressing. The team on the court should be absolutely scary. The least amount of talent of any Bearcat team since the Yates era. Hopefully they lose enough to get Mick fired and they land another miracle Huggins type hire.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
If you are talking about Cronin's 5 years here I might agree with the talent level being as bad as it has been in a long time. If you are talking about this years team in particular that is just hyperbole. Mick's first couple teams were much more lacking in talent. Mick might not have a player like Stephenson who can be "the guy" but he has a much better overall team than he has had since being at UC IMO. His teams have improved every year and I expect that to continue this year. As for the game last night, the Bearcats looked as though they expected The Mount to roll over for them. They looked sloppy and uninspired for almost the whole game. I certainly hope UC can put up a better effort than that in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I like Mick's recruiting class so much next year that I truly want him to stay. I know some will say well he won't be able to coach them up but I really think it will be his best class. His seat is warm, but not on fire. It would take a 13-17 to get him canned in my opinion.
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
The top ranked player is #123 according to Rivals. How could this be his best class at UC? Hell, Stephenson by himself made last year's class better than 2011.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by WMR; 11-15-2010 at 04:52 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Just look at ESPN's headline for there basketball recruiting page..
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bask...cruiting/index
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Glad to see UC can still nearly blow a 19 point lead.
Cats win, I guess. 69-59.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. Last edited by paintmered; 11-15-2010 at 09:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Early season games are always interesting. You see a lot of times good teams losing to lesser competition. Teams are getting their game legs under then and trying to figure each other out. I don't put too much stock in early season games for that reason.
As for Cronin I just don't like him as a game coach. It is early in the season but he continues to think he has a deep bench. Most good teams settle on 7 players and play the rest on a as need basis. Its good to see that Thomas, Bishop, and Davis continue to think that they are 3 point shooters. Its only one game and you will see some improvement but man this could be a long season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,918
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I will give Cronin credit, he finally put together a solid recruiting class for next year. Hiring Darren Savino helped quite a bit with getting some of those guys.
As for the game, all his teams have looked sloopy, they never run an organized offense. It's always spray and pray, because they don't have any great shooters. His seat is pretty warm at this point, if they don't make the tournament, he could very well be gone.
__________________
Pessimists are well informed optimists |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,007
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I don't mean to pour cold water on what looks to be a pretty good recruiting class, but UC's Class of 2007 (this year's seniors) was similarly ranked pretty highly, as well, coming in. That class included Rashad Bishop, Biggie McClain, Larry Davis, Alvin Mitchell, Jason Henry (who never played at UC) and Kenny Belton. Look no further than RedsZone if you don't believe me. Rankings mean very little if those players don't develop, as was the case with this year's senior class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
Rashad Bishop - probably the best out of the class. Underperformed at times, dismissed from the team and reinstated for this year. Biggie McClain - a project whose development suffered from injuries. At least he's no longer a stick. Larry Davis - a complete failure of a player. Can't score, can't guard. I don't know how he gets as minutes as he does. Yet, Cronin keeps throwing him in there to disastrous results. Alvin Mitchell - supposedly the most talented of the recruiting class. The question with him at the time was not if he was going to be good, but for how many years could UC keep him around. He turned out to be lazy and a malcontent, and soon found himself off the team for good. Jason Henry - never played (as you mention) although I forget why. I think Darnel Wilks took his scholarship instead of going to prep school. Kenny Belton - chronic back injuries ended his career. He still has his scholarship due to the medical issues but is no longer with the team. So yeah, the class has been a total flop for many reasons. There was reason to be excited about the class at the time, but sometimes kids don't pan out...sometimes all at once.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I don't know what happened over the off-season, but Larry Davis has gone from the quoted to an asset. I'll gladly eat my shorts for him proving everyone wrong and not mailing in his senior season.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. Last edited by paintmered; 01-06-2011 at 11:54 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |