![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Given 600+ PA, how much WAR would Janish produce in 2011? | |||
| Less than 0 wins (below replacement) |
|
2 | 3.23% |
| 0 wins (replacement) |
|
3 | 4.84% |
| .5 win |
|
6 | 9.68% |
| 1.0 win |
|
13 | 20.97% |
| 1.5 wins |
|
14 | 22.58% |
| 2.0 wins (major league average) |
|
20 | 32.26% |
| more than 2.0 wins |
|
4 | 6.45% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Projecting Janish
There has been some spirited debate in the Jose Reyes thread about how much production we should expect from Janish given the full-time gig. My position is possibly the most optimistic of anybody's I've seen. But I'm curious just how out of line I am with the RedsZone consensus.
So, given the full-time job and assuming he keeps it (140+ games, 600+ PA), what level of production should we expect from Janish. No explanation is needed, but certainly feel free...
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Projecting Janish
.235/.305/.340
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,382
|
Re: Projecting Janish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Greatness In The Making
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,078
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Ditto.. Maybe slightly higher average. His D is what the Reds are in love with. I don't think they care about his offense. I do on the other hand. When Stubbs was near the mandoza line.. I thought Heisey should of gotten some starts. I think this club could potentially put together a package for a Jose Reyes. I think you solve issues at lead off and at SS.
I would propose: CoCo Cordero, Homer Bailey, Logan Ondrusek, Zack Cozart & Todd Frazier to the Mets Jose Reyes, Oliver Perez, & Cash to the Reds Masset or Chapman become Closer Reyes Leadsoff and is your starting SS Perez is Long Relief or Situational Mets get a Closer and a Set-up man Bailey gives them a power arm to the rotation Mets also get a young group up the middle with Cozart and Frazier
__________________
"I could watch video of Griffey swinging all day. It's like baseball porn." - C. Trent Rosecrans 2008 Reds Record When I Attend: 9W - 5L 2009 Reds Record When I Attend: 1W - 2L 2010 Reds Record When I Attend: 1W - 0L 2011 Reds Record When I Attend: 0W - 1L |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,946
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Everytime I see Janish on the field I get flashbacks of Darrel Chaney and Woody Woodward.
Rem |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: indiana
Posts: 1,220
|
Re: Projecting Janish
.242, .288, .333
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,382
|
Re: Projecting Janish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Quote:
Reyes is making $11M in 2011. Perez is due $12M in 2011. They are both set to become free agents after the 2011 season. And you're willing to give up young, cheap players like Bailey, Ondrusek, Cozart, and Frazier for that? No thanks.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Just for the record, if he puts up those numbers offensively, and his career numbers defensively, Janish would be very close to a 2 WAR player.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Projecting Janish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: Projecting Janish
I could say the same thing about his offensive numbers being skewed by abnormally low 2008, or even his 2009 numbers.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Quote:
I am comparing his 2009 UZR to recent other numbers put up by SSs in the league. His number was abnormal to the rest of the league, not his history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Projecting Janish
Quote:
I also think his defense is a little overrated here on RZ. He's no Adam Everett.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,802
|
Re: Projecting Janish
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
|
Re: Projecting Janish
.250 .350 .390 .740
And he'll get many presents from his pitching staff.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |