![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,986
|
A slightly different approach to Dunn
Pretend that Adam Dunn is a free agent this year. Assume that he has no predispotion to play for a given team, be it Reds, Astros, or otherwise. It's all about the benjamins.
1.) What deal would you offer? 2.) What is the best deal you think he'd get (and from whom)?
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Quote:
Since I think that'd be a fair deal for him, it's hard to imagine what he *could* get, since different teams value different things. I could see a team stocked with high average hitters, but who lacks a dominant power threat in the lineup, pursuing him and offering him more. Something in the realm of $10-$12 million a year wouldn't be out of the question for a consistent 40 homer guy who is entering his prime years.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,407
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Well here is another question that I don't know has been discussed too much yet and that is whether the Reds should exercise the 2008 option on Dunn.
When Dunn signed his contract this spring he got salaries of $7.5 million for this season and $10.5 million for 2007. The club has an option for a $13 million salary in 2008, which it can buy out for $500,000. I am on the fence and obviously would depend on the trade options, Bruce's and Stubbs' development etc. In terms of his contract, the numbers are similar to Sexson who has always struck me as being a guide for Dunn's value though always a couple of years older. If Dunn performs at a similar level in early '07 to his performance this year, should the Reds pick up his option for '08? Last edited by klw; 09-29-2006 at 11:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Would you trade Dunn for Berkman? curious
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,676
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Who wouldn't?
Berkman is second only to Pujols in the NL.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 414
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
I like Dunn but I know he could never play centerfield for any stretch of time like Berk did.
__________________
WHEN DOES IT STOP!?!? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,798
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
throws 106. NBD.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,181
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 317
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
I think i'd need to see another season similar to 2006 from each of them to place them on the same plane as Pujols or Berkman. Although, I will say that Soriano putting up the power numbers that he has this season while playing in the MLB equivalent of the Grand Canyon is beyond impressive.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 317
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,623
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
What are the odds that the season ends and we find out that Dunn has been playing with some undisclosed injury so as to justify his 2nd half performance?
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: A slightly different approach to Dunn
Quote:
I'm certainly not knocking Howard, he's having an unbelieveable season and I'd be more than happy to have him on the Reds. But Berkman and Pujols have consistently produced season after season after season. If Howard comes back next year and even approaches what he has done this year, I'll happily elevate him to the same status as each of them. But I'm not prepared to do that with Howard quite yet.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |