![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which would you have rather had on your team? | |||
| Concepcion |
|
75 | 70.09% |
| Smith |
|
32 | 29.91% |
| Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Much like the the Jim Rice VS. Dave Parker question, if you were a GM and had the opportunity to choose only one of these guys to play for your team in their prime, which one would you choose? This may be closer and tougher than you think.
Concepcion's Stats: Code:
Year Ag Tm Lg G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG TB SH SF IBB HBP GDP
+--------------+---+----+----+----+---+--+---+----+---+--+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+---+---+
1970 22 CIN NL 101 265 38 69 6 3 1 19 10 2 23 45 .260 .324 .317 84 3 2 5 3 10
1971 23 CIN NL 130 327 24 67 4 4 1 20 9 3 18 51 .205 .246 .251 82 8 1 2 0 10
1972 24 CIN NL 119 378 40 79 13 2 2 29 13 6 32 65 .209 .272 .270 102 5 4 8 2 11
1973 25 CIN NL 89 328 39 94 18 3 8 46 22 5 21 55 .287 .327 .433 142 2 5 3 1 7 AS
1974 26 CIN NL 160 594 70 167 25 1 14 82 41 6 44 79 .281 .335 .397 236 5 4 10 6 20 MVP-15
1975 27 CIN NL 140 507 62 139 23 1 5 49 33 6 39 51 .274 .326 .353 179 6 4 4 2 17 AS
1976 28 CIN NL 152 576 74 162 28 7 9 69 21 10 49 68 .281 .335 .401 231 4 6 11 1 11 AS
1977 29 CIN NL 156 572 59 155 26 3 8 64 29 7 46 77 .271 .322 .369 211 6 6 6 0 15 AS
1978 30 CIN NL 153 565 75 170 33 4 6 67 23 10 51 83 .301 .357 .405 229 3 4 4 1 14 AS
1979 31 CIN NL 149 590 91 166 25 3 16 84 19 7 64 73 .281 .348 .415 245 6 6 5 0 18 MVP-9,AS
1980 32 CIN NL 156 622 72 162 31 8 5 77 12 2 37 107 .260 .300 .360 224 2 6 2 1 20 AS
1981 33 CIN NL 106 421 57 129 28 0 5 67 4 5 37 61 .306 .358 .409 172 2 7 1 1 13 SS,MVP-4,AS
1982 34 CIN NL 147 572 48 164 25 4 5 53 13 6 45 61 .287 .337 .371 212 2 4 4 0 20 SS,AS
1983 35 CIN NL 143 528 54 123 22 0 1 47 14 9 56 81 .233 .303 .280 148 2 7 9 0 21
1984 36 CIN NL 154 531 46 130 26 1 4 58 22 6 52 72 .245 .307 .320 170 8 9 5 0 9
1985 37 CIN NL 155 560 59 141 19 2 7 48 16 12 50 67 .252 .314 .330 185 3 4 3 3 23
1986 38 CIN NL 90 311 42 81 13 2 3 30 13 2 26 43 .260 .314 .344 107 5 4 1 0 13
1987 39 CIN NL 104 279 32 89 15 0 1 33 4 3 28 24 .319 .377 .384 107 1 3 5 0 10
1988 40 CIN NL 84 197 11 39 9 0 0 8 3 2 18 23 .198 .265 .244 48 1 0 5 0 4
+--------------+---+----+----+----+---+--+---+----+---+--+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+---+---+
19 Seasons 8723 2326 48 950 109 1186 .267 .322 .357 74 86 93 21 266
2488 993 389 101 321 736 3114
Smith's Stats: Code:
Year Ag Tm Lg G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG TB SH SF IBB HBP GDP
+--------------+---+----+----+----+---+--+---+----+---+--+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+---+---+
1978 23 SDP NL 159 590 69 152 17 6 1 46 40 12 47 43 .258 .311 .312 184 28 3 0 0 11 RoY-2
1979 24 SDP NL 156 587 77 124 18 6 0 27 28 7 37 37 .211 .260 .262 154 22 1 5 2 11
1980 25 SDP NL 158 609 67 140 18 5 0 35 57 15 71 49 .230 .313 .276 168 23 4 1 5 9
1981 26 SDP NL 110 450 53 100 11 2 0 21 22 12 41 37 .222 .294 .256 115 10 1 1 5 8 AS
1982 27 STL NL 140 488 58 121 24 1 2 43 25 5 68 32 .248 .339 .314 153 4 5 12 2 10 MVP-13,AS
1983 28 STL NL 159 552 69 134 30 6 3 50 34 7 64 36 .243 .321 .335 185 7 2 9 1 10 MVP-21,AS
1984 29 STL NL 124 412 53 106 20 5 1 44 35 7 56 17 .257 .347 .337 139 11 3 5 2 8 AS
1985 30 STL NL 158 537 70 148 22 3 6 54 31 8 65 27 .276 .355 .361 194 9 2 11 2 13 MVP-18,AS
1986 31 STL NL 153 514 67 144 19 4 0 54 31 7 79 27 .280 .376 .333 171 11 3 13 2 9 AS
1987 32 STL NL 158 600 104 182 40 4 0 75 43 9 89 36 .303 .392 .383 230 12 4 3 1 9 SS,MVP-2,AS
1988 33 STL NL 153 575 80 155 27 1 3 51 57 9 74 43 .270 .350 .336 193 12 7 2 1 7 AS
1989 34 STL NL 155 593 82 162 30 8 2 50 29 7 55 37 .273 .335 .361 214 11 3 3 2 10 AS
1990 35 STL NL 143 512 61 130 21 1 1 50 32 6 61 33 .254 .330 .305 156 7 10 4 2 8 AS
1991 36 STL NL 150 550 96 157 30 3 3 50 35 9 83 36 .285 .380 .367 202 6 1 2 1 8 MVP-20,AS
1992 37 STL NL 132 518 73 153 20 2 0 31 43 9 59 34 .295 .367 .342 177 12 1 4 0 11 MVP-22,AS
1993 38 STL NL 141 545 75 157 22 6 1 53 21 8 43 18 .288 .337 .356 194 7 7 1 1 11
1994 39 STL NL 98 381 51 100 18 3 3 30 6 3 38 26 .262 .326 .349 133 10 4 3 0 3 AS
1995 40 STL NL 44 156 16 31 5 1 0 11 4 3 17 12 .199 .282 .244 38 5 2 0 2 6 AS
1996 41 STL NL 82 227 36 64 10 2 2 18 7 5 25 9 .282 .358 .370 84 7 0 0 2 5 AS
+--------------+---+----+----+----+---+--+---+----+---+--+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+---+---+
19 Seasons 9396 2460 69 793 148 589 .262 .337 .328 214 63 79 33 167
2573 1257 402 28 580 1072 3084
FWIW, I noticed that as a shortstop, Concepcion's career fielding percentage is better than Smith's.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,503
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Davey.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,665
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Ozzie by a long shot.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Concepcion is not a hall of famer. Ozzie is.
I hate Ozzie Smith, but the truth is the truth.
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,717
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
I always thought that Concepcion was a marginal HOF candidate in the same vien as Tony Perez.
Perez has gotten in, and Davey hasn't even been close. It's clear that, according to the voters, I overvalued Concepcion. I'm still a little surprised with how badly he has fared in HOF voting. He alway hit very well for a SS (for his time), and was a perennial gold glove winner. He played in the WS three times, and invented the "hop" throw from the hole in SS for use on artificial turf. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Do it!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rincon, PR-Winter Pk, FL
Posts: 1,820
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Davey!
I'm old school...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,582
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
If I had to take one in my prime to build around its Ozzie. I like Davey better as a fan but the decision is pretty simple imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Yep, he may have been the best defensive player ever.
BTW, that's no slight on Concepcion. Ozzie's one of the top 10 shortstops in baseball history.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Having never seen Davey play in person, I think the problem with Concepcion wasn't the public face of the franchise and his reputation as an all-time great fielder isn't there -- fair or not.
I think there's some feeling that he was a fielding first SS on some really good teams and that his fieldling, while good, wasn't superlative in the way that Ozzie's was. While they did have a WS appearance, the Cards were usually a mediocre team through his tenure. He was able to shine, to stand out on a team that didn't have many other stars. He was speed and defense on teams that won with pitching, speed, and defense. Meanwhile, Davey was simply part of the crew with other household names like Morgan, Perez, Bench, Rose, Foster, etc. In my mind, the question becomes, how much better defensively was Ozzie than Davey? How does Davey stack up historically. Frankly, unless he can be considered one of the all-time great SS defensively, I'm not sure he has a great case for the hall of fame (though I know that's not the question at hand). I think Omar Vizquel is going to find himself in the same boat. Personally, I'd take Ozzie.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. Last edited by RedsManRick; 01-02-2007 at 01:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,503
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Quote:
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Fair enough Randy. But I would make the argument that people who watched Davey play every day and cheered for his team are more likely to be biased regarding his relative standing in history than someone who never saw him play a game.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,503
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
I don't think I am biased in saying that Concepcion was the best shortstop in baseball during the time he played. When you compare him to the players that are in the Hall of Fame at that position, he stacks up pretty well.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Exactly. Hard to ask more than being the best of your era, anchoring a dynasty, winning 5 GGs and appearing in 9 All-Star games. Throw in that his numbers are as good or better than half the shortstops in Cooperstown and I'm not sure what the argument against the guy is.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,503
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Exactly.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,503
|
Re: Dave Concepcion VS. Ozzie Smith
Not to mention, he played in 5 League Championship Series and 4 World Series, was the MVP of the 1982 All Star Game and won 2 Silver Slugger awards.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |