![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
REDSBROWNSBUCKEYES
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 771
|
Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Just a thought but Tampa Bay has two players who can play centerfield in Baldelli and Carl Crawford. Both of which would put up around 25 hrs at GABP, replacing the lost power from the Kearns trade. Both also would be a big upgrade defensively. What do you think it would take to get one of these guys? Id try Dunn, Deno, and a prospect for both but thats just dreamin. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
If Crawford was a good option in CF I believe he would have played there when Baldelli was injured. Even the Baldelli missed all of 2005 and half of 2006 Crawford has only played 23 games in CF in his career.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Passion for the game
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 8,080
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Quote:
Baldelli would be a good option. He's not very patient but he can rake and he should be 100% by now.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,123
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Baldelli would be a fan favorite in no time here. I don't know that they are keen on getting rid of him, but if they are, he's a target I'd choose if I had a vote.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Baldelli would be a good pickup.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,570
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
The thing is,to get either guy, the Reds would have to get in line. Tampa has resisted trading both those guys so until they get expensive, it'll be expensive to trade for one.... I seriously doubt Dunn+Deno+prospect for Crawford even gets them to return Krivsky's phone call.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Quote:
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
I have no idea what TB is interested in doing. They seem to have a tin ear when it comes to understanding when players should be dealt. They held on to Huff and Lugo way too long.
They have a surplus of OF/DH types. (Crawford/Baldelli/Young/Gomes/Dukes/Upton) What they would want in return is not more OF DH types(like the suggestion of Deno and Dunn), they should want pitching.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Option #1: Denorfia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
REDSBROWNSBUCKEYES
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 771
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Quote:
The Tampa Bay Devil Rays held the first pick overall, and they spent it on North Carolina high-schooler Josh Hamilton, widely considered the best teenager in the draft. The entire first round passed without Carl’s name being called, but the D-Rays opened round two by selecting him. Tampa Bay was thrilled he was still on the board. Bart Braun and Doug Gassaway, who were calling the shots on draft day, actually had Carl rated above Hamilton in many categories. USA Today, in fact, predicted he would be a “high first-round pick.” Obviously, his Nebraska scholarship scared the other teams off. All in all, it was a bad day for college football coaches. The Rays’ third pick, Doug Waechter, was set to become South Florida’s QB. It took less than two weeks for Tampa Bay to cut a deal with Carl. His $1.2 million bonus was the fourth-highest ever paid to a non-first-round pick. He reported to Princeton of the Appalachian League, where he joined Hamilton in the D-Ray outfield under the tutelage of manager Bobby Ramos. Both players hit well, but Hamilton, with 10 homers and a .349 average in 56 games, was the one who earned a late-season promotion. Carl’s stats were nearly as good. He batted .319 in 60 games and stole 17 bases in 19 attempts. While the team hoped to see more power out of Carl, he was named one of the league’s Top 10 prospects. The 2000 season found Carl playing for Charleston of the South Atlantic League. Once again, he was overshadowed by Hamilton, who starred in the Futures Game and the SAL All-Star Game, and was named the league’s co-MVP with JR House. Hamilton hit .302 for the year, and finished with 13 homers and 61 RBIs despite missing the final month due to pain associated with a spring-training car wreck. Carl had himself a nice season too, matching Hamilton’s .301 average and knocking in 57 runs. His 38 extra-base hits were one short of Hamilton’s total, while his 55 steals easily led the RiverDogs. And once again, Carl was named one of his league’s Top 10 prospects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
CHRIS DENORFIA.
PECOTA weighted means projections: Deno, 458 PA: .296/.365/.459, 12 HR, 9/12 SB, .280 EqA Freel, 447 PA: .271/.361/.404, 8 HR, 32/42 SB, .270 EqA Bruce, 571 PA: .264/.319/.460, 20 HR, 14/21 SB, .260 EqA Crawford, 586 PA: .309/.351/.476, 16 HR, 43/54 SB, .294 Baldelli, 520 PA: .299/.342/.501, 20 HR, 13/17 SB, .292 Now, looking at those projections, make an argument for trading away talent to acquire Baldellli or Crawford over our in house options. Another very interesting projection is Joey Votto: Votto, 630 PA: .284/.366/.511, 29 HR, 18/24 SB. That's right, PECOTA projects Votto as the second best offensive Red. In terms of EqA: 1. Dunn .314 2. Votto .293 3. Junior .281 4. Denorfia .280 5. Encarnacion .279 6. Hatteberg .273 7. Freel .270 8. Ross .262 9. Bruce .260 10. Hatteberg .259 11. Phillips .256 12. Conine .252 13. Gil .249 (as a CF) 14. Gonzalez .247 Not saying that these projections are perfect, but at least one method of looking at things suggests that while Baldelli or Crawford would indeed be upgrades, perhaps not quite as big as you'd think. If Deno does not get a real shot (not just ST or 100 AB in April) at being an everyday OF, it speaks pretty poorly of the Reds brass. Yes, I know he could fail. He could be Brandon Larson. But everything from the scouting and statistic point of view suggests otherwise -- to say nothing of the fact that he's the best defensive option we have.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
I'd be happy with Freel in centerfield. He's a better option than Griffey right now.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Centerfield possibilities if KGJ moves to right
Nice post RMR. As you noted, the Reds already have a multi-faceted CF candidate, plus he's inexpensive.
What they need is some more thump in the lineup. The club had a .409 SLG after the All-Star break. That's a sad state of affairs. When Jr. gets injured this season (and you can bank on that happening), the team won't have much muscle. Also, anyone have the PECOTAs for the Reds? Haven't seen those yet.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |