RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2007, 06:44 PM   #1
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Rank the NL infields

The Sporting News has been doing various rankings in recent weeks. I don't think I'm going out on a limb in saying the folks around here are at least as smart as the Sporting News. Anyway, here's my cut at it:

1. Mets

Carlos Delgado, Jose Valentin, Jose Reyes, David Wright

There might be three future Hall of Famers in that infield. Reyes is among the most electric players in the game and Wright is one of the best young hitters int he game.

2. Cardinals

Albert Pujols, Adam Kennedy, David Eckstein, Scott Rolen

Two guaranteed Hall of Famers in this IF. Eckstein is a complete pest. Kennedy is functional.

3. Phillies

Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins, Wes Helms

Hard to believe Helms will produce as a regular for a full season, but Howard's a megastud and Utley is one heck of a nice player. Rollins basically has to play all the defense. He also should be allowed to skip the month of April (career .694 OPS that month).

4. Padres

Adrian Gonzalez, Marcus Giles, Khalil Greene, Kevin Kouzmanoff

Gonzalez arrived last year, Giles will rebound with a vengeance and the team flat out plays better when Greene's in the lineup. Kouzmanoff? Who knows, but he should be at least as good as Wes Helms.

5. Dodgers

Nomah, Jeff Kent, Rafael Furcal, Wilson Betemit

Nomah could spend the year injured and Kent could finally show his age (though he's been worlds better in his 30s than he was in his 20s), but those two guys and Furcal could also carry a team. Betemit's yet another question mark at 3B.

6. Diamondbacks

Conor Jackson, Orlando Hudson, Stephen Drew, Chad Tracy

Potentially the steadiest hitting IF in the league. Defense is shaky (mostly thanks to Jackson being a complete boob in the field), but Hudson can cover a lot of ills on that front.

7. Brewers

Prince Fielder, Rickie Weeks, J.J. Hardy, Corey Koskie

Bill Hall's supposedly heading to the OF, but if these guys can stay healthy there's a lot of danger in there. Fielder and Weeks could be on the verge of major star turns.

8. Nationals

Nick Johnson, Felipe Lopez, Cristian Guzman, Ryan Zimmerman

Guzman hurts, a lot, but the other three guys can wear out a pitching staff. Even if Felipe doesn't take all that well to 2B this should be a pretty solid defensive unit too.

9. Rockies

Todd Helton, Kaz Matsui, Troy Tulowitzki, Garrett Atkins

Matsui seemed to rediscover the guy who set the Japanese leagues on fire once he got out of New York. Atkins had a phenomenal season in 2006. If Helton rebounds and Tulo's the real thing this is a solid, if slightly underpowered, unit.

10. Marlins

Mike Jacobs, Dan Uggla, Hanley Ramirez, Miguel Cabrera

There's some serious potential for the middle IF to regress a bit and it's an open question as to whether Cabrera should play 3B. He's sort of Bobby Bo over there. Still, I can't get enough of saying the word Uggla.

[b]11. Braves[b]

Scott Thorman, Kelly Johnson, Edgar Renteria, Chipper Jones

Obviously a lot hinges on Jones playing a full season. Renteria's still got a shot to collect 3,000 hits in his career. Johnson and Thorman massive question marks, both at the plate and in the field. It's possible Johnson will slide over to 1B and Willy Aybar, who seems to be a baseball player, could win the 2B job.

12. Reds

Scott Hatteberg, Brandon Phillips, Alex Gonzalez, Edwin Encarnacion

If EdE can harness his fielding talents, this could be one of the better fielding IFs around. Yet Gonzalez is an out machine and Hatteberg is almost a lock to drop off from what he did last season. The two young guys will have to hold up the offensive end of the bargain.

13. Cubs

Derrek Lee, Mark DeRosa, Cesar Izturis, Aramis Ramirez

Lee's more likely to play like his career average (.863 OPS) than his 2005 career year (1.060 OPS). DeRosa will lose his starting job by Independence Day. Between Izturis and Ramirez you've got one wonderful player and one guy who can't do anything right.

14. Pirates

Adam LaRoche, Jose Castillo, Jack Wilson, Freddy Sanchez

They'll field well, but Wilson and Castillo could have a .300 OB between them. Sanchez doesn't walk, has no power and he's not hitting .344 again. LaRoche will help, but he's not nearly enough to cover for the offensive holes in the rest of the IF.

15. Astros

Lance Berkman, Craig Biggio, Adam Everett, Morgan Ensberg

Sure Berkman's got MVP ability. Yet Biggio's game is in ruins and Everett is as bad an offensive player as anyone in the majors (and he's not likely to repeat his defensive career year). Ensberg's game looked like it was falling apart last season. Mark Loretta will help a bit, but if Berkman gets injured this IF could turn into a super volcano of suckitude.

16. Giants

Rich Aurilia, Ray Durham, Omar Vizquel, Pedro Feliz

Word is this group just signed to the Swan Song label.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.

Last edited by M2; 02-02-2007 at 09:54 AM.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-31-2007, 07:28 PM   #2
TC81190
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,072
Re: Rank the NL infields

I think you underrated the Giants infield, they should be in front of at least the Pirates, but otherwise, yeah. Bonus points for an appearance of the phrase "super volcano of suckitude."
__________________
I hope it's never sunny in Philly again.
TC81190 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:43 PM   #3
Dracodave
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: We have pitchers now?!
Posts: 1,017
Re: Rank the NL infields

I think the worst infield has to be Houston.

Pirates defensively should be okay outside of Castillo on second. Castillo will bat around 250, Sanchez around 270/280, I doubt any higher. LaRoche is very good but I doubt he provides that "lefty power bat" to go with Bay.

I don't think Cincinnati is gonna be too good either. Outside of Phillips and Gonzo, I really dont see "gold glove" now anywhere. EdE will get better, but that still leaves a hole at first. Not to mention the LOVELY teddy bear of a catcher we have, does he avoid getting hit this year again?

On the topic of infields but offtopic with the AL, I think Clevelands infield minus Peralta could be very nice. Garko/Blake, Barfield, Peralta and Marte/Blake with Hector Luna as a reserve? Could be very good.
__________________
"For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled."
-Hunter S. Thompson

Last edited by Dracodave; 01-31-2007 at 07:46 PM.
Dracodave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:36 PM   #4
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,684
Re: Rank the NL infields

I took the approach of ranking each position 1 to 16 and summing. Lowest number wins.

Code:
Team	1B	2B	3B	SS	Total
NYM	4	15	1	1	21
Phi	2	1	16	2	21
STL	1	11	3	8	23
FLA	14	7	2	4	27
LA	10	2	12	3	27
HOU	3	9	8	9	29
SD	7	6	15	5	33
Atl	11	16	4	6	37
CHI	5	13	5	14	37
MIL	12	3	13	11	39
SF	15	4	14	7	40
WAS	8	10	7	16	41
COL	6	12	10	13	41
AZ	13	5	11	12	41
PIT	9	14	9	10	42
CIN	16	8	6	15	45

Last edited by mth123; 01-31-2007 at 08:40 PM.
mth123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:38 PM   #5
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
Re: Rank the NL infields

Code:
Team	1B	2B	3B	SS	Total
NYM	3	15	1	1	20
Phi	2	1	16	2	21
STL	1	11	5	9	26
FLA	15	7	2	4	28
SD	7	2	15	5	29
CIN	13	3	6	8	30
LA	9	8	12	3	32
CHI	4	13	3	14	34
WAS	6	6	7	16	35
HOU	5	9	8	15	37
MIL	11	4	13	11	39
AZ	12	5	11	12	40
PIT	8	14	9	10	41
Atl	16	16	4	6	42
SF	14	10	14	7	45
COL	10	12	10	13	45
I struggled mightily with the second basemen especially. I think Kent's going to fall off drastically, as is Biggio [his second half wasn't a fluke and his desire to get 3000 will further the fall] as a result I may have homerized the Reds a little much because I asked in some cases which 2b I'd rather have and the answers were few.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 12:06 AM   #6
Hollcat
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: So. Cen. KY
Posts: 1,109
Re: Rank the NL infields

Thorman better than Fielder?
Hollcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:17 AM   #7
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,684
Re: Rank the NL infields

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollcat View Post
Thorman better than Fielder?
Not if he plays everyday. But if Thorman and Wilson platoon with the hot bat always in, the combo will do quite well IMO.
mth123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 05:08 AM   #8
NYDCYankee
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Re: Rank the NL infields

I like the Phillies better than the Cardinals. And the Dodgers better than the Padres, in fact I would drop the Padres infield much further down the list maybe down to 11th.
NYDCYankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 09:40 AM   #9
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Rank the NL infields

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYDCYankee View Post
I like the Phillies better than the Cardinals. And the Dodgers better than the Padres, in fact I would drop the Padres infield much further down the list maybe down to 11th.
So put up your list. That's supposed to be the purpose of the thread. I just threw mine up there as a starter. I'd like to see how others rank them.

As for the Padres, I've certainly got some projection in there. They're probably the best defensive unit from 1B-SS in the league. The real question is how they'll hit. Gonzalez sure looked like the real thing last season. Giles' 2006 should be an anomaly. Greene's just coming into his prime and he's been a lot better than people realize. Petco's chewed up his numbers, but he's a very good road hitter and, park-adjusted, he's been an above average hitting SS. Kouzmanoff is a wild card. He's raked in the minors. That might be an illusion, but being at least as good as Wes Helms, Wilson Betemit and Pedro Feliz shouldn't be too hard.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.

Last edited by M2; 02-02-2007 at 10:34 AM.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:01 AM   #10
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Rank the NL infields

I'd take the Cubs and Stros over the Reds. We certainly have no Lee/Berkman at first nor a GG shortstop.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:07 AM   #11
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Rank the NL infields

Code:
Team	1B	2B	3B	SS	Total
PHI	2	1	16	2	21
NYM	5	12	3	3	23
FLA     13      4       1       5       23
STL	1	13	5	6	25
LA	10	3	11	1	25
HOU     3	9	9	8	29
ATL     16      11      2       4       33
SD	8	5	14	7	34
ARZ	11	2	10	11      34
WSH	6	7	6	16	35
CHI     4       14      4       15      37 
MIL     7	6	15	10      38
SF	14	8	13	9	44
CIN  	15	10	8	14      47
COL	12	16	7	12	47
PIT	9	15	12	13	49
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

Last edited by flyer85; 02-02-2007 at 10:58 AM.
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:10 AM   #12
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,665
Re: Rank the NL infields

Quote:
Utley is one heck of a nice player.
Led Zeppelin is one heck of a nice band.

Honestly, if the Phillies had anyone better than replacement level at 3B, their infield would rival the Mets'.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:31 AM   #13
CaiGuy
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redsland
Posts: 828
Re: Rank the NL infields

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
I took the approach of ranking each position 1 to 16 and summing. Lowest number wins.

Code:
Team	1B	2B	3B	SS	Total
NYM	4	15	1	1	21
Phi	2	1	16	2	21
STL	1	11	3	8	23
FLA	14	7	2	4	27
LA	10	2	12	3	27
HOU	3	9	8	9	29
SD	7	6	15	5	33
Atl	11	16	4	6	37
CHI	5	13	5	14	37
MIL	12	3	13	11	39
SF	15	4	14	7	40
WAS	8	10	7	16	41
COL	6	12	10	13	41
AZ	13	5	11	12	41
PIT	9	14	9	10	42
CIN	16	8	6	15	45
You rate Alex Gonzalez under Cesar Izturis and Jack Wilson?
CaiGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:35 AM   #14
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,481
Re: Rank the NL infields

OK, here's mine...

1. Mets

2. Phils

3. Cards

4. Marlins

5. Cubs

6. Dbacks

7. Dodgers

8. Brewers

9. Nats

10. Pads

11. Rockies

12. Reds

13. Pirates

14. Astros

15. Braves

16. Giants
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 11:17 AM   #15
NYDCYankee
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Re: Rank the NL infields

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
So put up your list. That's supposed to be the purpose of the thread. I just threw mine up there as a starter. I'd like to see how others rank them.

As for the Padres, I've certainly got some projection in there. They're probably the best defensive unit from 1B-SS in the league. The real question is how they'll hit. Gonzalez sure looked like the real thing last season. Giles' 2006 should be an anomaly. Greene's just coming into his prime and he's been a lot better than people realize. Petco's chewed up his numbers, but he's a very good road hitter and, park-adjusted, he's been an above average hitting SS. Kouzmanoff is a wild card. He's raked in the minors. That might be an illusion, but being at least as good as Wes Helms, Wilson Betemit and Pedro Feliz shouldn't be too hard.
Ok. Let's see. This is what I would do.

Mets
Phillies
Cards
Cubs
Marlins
Milwaukee
DBacks
Dodgers
Rockies
Nats
Padres
Pirates
Houston
Cincy
SF
ATL
NYDCYankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25