![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Rank the NL infields
The Sporting News has been doing various rankings in recent weeks. I don't think I'm going out on a limb in saying the folks around here are at least as smart as the Sporting News. Anyway, here's my cut at it:
1. Mets Carlos Delgado, Jose Valentin, Jose Reyes, David Wright There might be three future Hall of Famers in that infield. Reyes is among the most electric players in the game and Wright is one of the best young hitters int he game. 2. Cardinals Albert Pujols, Adam Kennedy, David Eckstein, Scott Rolen Two guaranteed Hall of Famers in this IF. Eckstein is a complete pest. Kennedy is functional. 3. Phillies Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins, Wes Helms Hard to believe Helms will produce as a regular for a full season, but Howard's a megastud and Utley is one heck of a nice player. Rollins basically has to play all the defense. He also should be allowed to skip the month of April (career .694 OPS that month). 4. Padres Adrian Gonzalez, Marcus Giles, Khalil Greene, Kevin Kouzmanoff Gonzalez arrived last year, Giles will rebound with a vengeance and the team flat out plays better when Greene's in the lineup. Kouzmanoff? Who knows, but he should be at least as good as Wes Helms. 5. Dodgers Nomah, Jeff Kent, Rafael Furcal, Wilson Betemit Nomah could spend the year injured and Kent could finally show his age (though he's been worlds better in his 30s than he was in his 20s), but those two guys and Furcal could also carry a team. Betemit's yet another question mark at 3B. 6. Diamondbacks Conor Jackson, Orlando Hudson, Stephen Drew, Chad Tracy Potentially the steadiest hitting IF in the league. Defense is shaky (mostly thanks to Jackson being a complete boob in the field), but Hudson can cover a lot of ills on that front. 7. Brewers Prince Fielder, Rickie Weeks, J.J. Hardy, Corey Koskie Bill Hall's supposedly heading to the OF, but if these guys can stay healthy there's a lot of danger in there. Fielder and Weeks could be on the verge of major star turns. 8. Nationals Nick Johnson, Felipe Lopez, Cristian Guzman, Ryan Zimmerman Guzman hurts, a lot, but the other three guys can wear out a pitching staff. Even if Felipe doesn't take all that well to 2B this should be a pretty solid defensive unit too. 9. Rockies Todd Helton, Kaz Matsui, Troy Tulowitzki, Garrett Atkins Matsui seemed to rediscover the guy who set the Japanese leagues on fire once he got out of New York. Atkins had a phenomenal season in 2006. If Helton rebounds and Tulo's the real thing this is a solid, if slightly underpowered, unit. 10. Marlins Mike Jacobs, Dan Uggla, Hanley Ramirez, Miguel Cabrera There's some serious potential for the middle IF to regress a bit and it's an open question as to whether Cabrera should play 3B. He's sort of Bobby Bo over there. Still, I can't get enough of saying the word Uggla. [b]11. Braves[b] Scott Thorman, Kelly Johnson, Edgar Renteria, Chipper Jones Obviously a lot hinges on Jones playing a full season. Renteria's still got a shot to collect 3,000 hits in his career. Johnson and Thorman massive question marks, both at the plate and in the field. It's possible Johnson will slide over to 1B and Willy Aybar, who seems to be a baseball player, could win the 2B job. 12. Reds Scott Hatteberg, Brandon Phillips, Alex Gonzalez, Edwin Encarnacion If EdE can harness his fielding talents, this could be one of the better fielding IFs around. Yet Gonzalez is an out machine and Hatteberg is almost a lock to drop off from what he did last season. The two young guys will have to hold up the offensive end of the bargain. 13. Cubs Derrek Lee, Mark DeRosa, Cesar Izturis, Aramis Ramirez Lee's more likely to play like his career average (.863 OPS) than his 2005 career year (1.060 OPS). DeRosa will lose his starting job by Independence Day. Between Izturis and Ramirez you've got one wonderful player and one guy who can't do anything right. 14. Pirates Adam LaRoche, Jose Castillo, Jack Wilson, Freddy Sanchez They'll field well, but Wilson and Castillo could have a .300 OB between them. Sanchez doesn't walk, has no power and he's not hitting .344 again. LaRoche will help, but he's not nearly enough to cover for the offensive holes in the rest of the IF. 15. Astros Lance Berkman, Craig Biggio, Adam Everett, Morgan Ensberg Sure Berkman's got MVP ability. Yet Biggio's game is in ruins and Everett is as bad an offensive player as anyone in the majors (and he's not likely to repeat his defensive career year). Ensberg's game looked like it was falling apart last season. Mark Loretta will help a bit, but if Berkman gets injured this IF could turn into a super volcano of suckitude. 16. Giants Rich Aurilia, Ray Durham, Omar Vizquel, Pedro Feliz Word is this group just signed to the Swan Song label.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. Last edited by M2; 02-02-2007 at 09:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,072
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
I think you underrated the Giants infield, they should be in front of at least the Pirates, but otherwise, yeah. Bonus points for an appearance of the phrase "super volcano of suckitude."
__________________
I hope it's never sunny in Philly again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: We have pitchers now?!
Posts: 1,017
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
I think the worst infield has to be Houston.
Pirates defensively should be okay outside of Castillo on second. Castillo will bat around 250, Sanchez around 270/280, I doubt any higher. LaRoche is very good but I doubt he provides that "lefty power bat" to go with Bay. I don't think Cincinnati is gonna be too good either. Outside of Phillips and Gonzo, I really dont see "gold glove" now anywhere. EdE will get better, but that still leaves a hole at first. Not to mention the LOVELY teddy bear of a catcher we have, does he avoid getting hit this year again? On the topic of infields but offtopic with the AL, I think Clevelands infield minus Peralta could be very nice. Garko/Blake, Barfield, Peralta and Marte/Blake with Hector Luna as a reserve? Could be very good.
__________________
"For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled." -Hunter S. Thompson Last edited by Dracodave; 01-31-2007 at 07:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,684
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
I took the approach of ranking each position 1 to 16 and summing. Lowest number wins.
Code:
Team 1B 2B 3B SS Total NYM 4 15 1 1 21 Phi 2 1 16 2 21 STL 1 11 3 8 23 FLA 14 7 2 4 27 LA 10 2 12 3 27 HOU 3 9 8 9 29 SD 7 6 15 5 33 Atl 11 16 4 6 37 CHI 5 13 5 14 37 MIL 12 3 13 11 39 SF 15 4 14 7 40 WAS 8 10 7 16 41 COL 6 12 10 13 41 AZ 13 5 11 12 41 PIT 9 14 9 10 42 CIN 16 8 6 15 45 Last edited by mth123; 01-31-2007 at 08:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Code:
Team 1B 2B 3B SS Total NYM 3 15 1 1 20 Phi 2 1 16 2 21 STL 1 11 5 9 26 FLA 15 7 2 4 28 SD 7 2 15 5 29 CIN 13 3 6 8 30 LA 9 8 12 3 32 CHI 4 13 3 14 34 WAS 6 6 7 16 35 HOU 5 9 8 15 37 MIL 11 4 13 11 39 AZ 12 5 11 12 40 PIT 8 14 9 10 41 Atl 16 16 4 6 42 SF 14 10 14 7 45 COL 10 12 10 13 45
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: So. Cen. KY
Posts: 1,109
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Thorman better than Fielder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,684
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
I like the Phillies better than the Cardinals. And the Dodgers better than the Padres, in fact I would drop the Padres infield much further down the list maybe down to 11th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Quote:
As for the Padres, I've certainly got some projection in there. They're probably the best defensive unit from 1B-SS in the league. The real question is how they'll hit. Gonzalez sure looked like the real thing last season. Giles' 2006 should be an anomaly. Greene's just coming into his prime and he's been a lot better than people realize. Petco's chewed up his numbers, but he's a very good road hitter and, park-adjusted, he's been an above average hitting SS. Kouzmanoff is a wild card. He's raked in the minors. That might be an illusion, but being at least as good as Wes Helms, Wilson Betemit and Pedro Feliz shouldn't be too hard.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. Last edited by M2; 02-02-2007 at 10:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
I'd take the Cubs and Stros over the Reds. We certainly have no Lee/Berkman at first nor a GG shortstop.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Code:
Team 1B 2B 3B SS Total PHI 2 1 16 2 21 NYM 5 12 3 3 23 FLA 13 4 1 5 23 STL 1 13 5 6 25 LA 10 3 11 1 25 HOU 3 9 9 8 29 ATL 16 11 2 4 33 SD 8 5 14 7 34 ARZ 11 2 10 11 34 WSH 6 7 6 16 35 CHI 4 14 4 15 37 MIL 7 6 15 10 38 SF 14 8 13 9 44 CIN 15 10 8 14 47 COL 12 16 7 12 47 PIT 9 15 12 13 49
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand Last edited by flyer85; 02-02-2007 at 10:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,665
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Quote:
Honestly, if the Phillies had anyone better than replacement level at 3B, their infield would rival the Mets'.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redsland
Posts: 828
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,481
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
OK, here's mine...
1. Mets 2. Phils 3. Cards 4. Marlins 5. Cubs 6. Dbacks 7. Dodgers 8. Brewers 9. Nats 10. Pads 11. Rockies 12. Reds 13. Pirates 14. Astros 15. Braves 16. Giants
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
Re: Rank the NL infields
Quote:
Mets Phillies Cards Cubs Marlins Milwaukee DBacks Dodgers Rockies Nats Padres Pirates Houston Cincy SF ATL |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |