RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2007, 05:41 PM   #1
TOBTTReds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,670
David Ross

I'm worried about him. He didn't look like he had a clue today. I just thought last year it looked like he got tired and pitchers started to figure him out a little. Today it seemed like he will struggle vs. bad pitchers. I guess we'll see more against Lilly, a LH, on Wed.
TOBTTReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 04-02-2007, 06:00 PM   #2
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
Re: David Ross

and Dunn's going to hit 300 homers
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:15 PM   #3
Bobcat J
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Downtown
Posts: 171
Re: David Ross

He did look really bad on his two strikeouts.
Bobcat J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:17 PM   #4
Bobcat J
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Downtown
Posts: 171
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
and Dunn's going to hit 300 homers
Actually, i think he is going to hit 324.
Bobcat J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:19 PM   #5
Tom Servo
thirsty and miserable
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,417
Re: David Ross

Definatly looked bad today, but one 3-4 game with two homeruns and everyone will be talking him up again. It's too early to say if he's lost it or not, even if he has.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."
Tom Servo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:20 PM   #6
roby
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
Re: David Ross

He made a nice play throwing a runner out at second.
roby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:22 PM   #7
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,824
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
Definatly looked bad today, but one 3-4 game with two homeruns and everyone will be talking him up again. It's too early to say if he's lost it or not, even if he has.
IMO, he's been extremely overrated. He .203 after the ASB. I'm expecting a not so productive season and a eventual platoon with Javy...with Ross getting the short end.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:26 PM   #8
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by roby View Post
He made a nice play throwing a runner out at second.
I don't know what kind of jump Lee had on that play, but the pitch was as close to being a pitch out without being a pitch out as you can get. It was high and outside and it allowed Ross to catch the ball out of the crouch and get right into his throwing motion. He also had a clear view of the runner. I would expect most every catcher to get the out on that pitch.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:31 PM   #9
TexRed
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 40
Re: David Ross

Just the first game folks, lot of AB's to come down the road. Only 161 games to go!
TexRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:34 PM   #10
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexRed View Post
lot of AB's to come down the road.
That's the worry.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:36 PM   #11
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: David Ross

He just looked totally lost... that's the worry. And his post-ASB numbers from last year aren't confidence inspiring.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:37 PM   #12
Bobcat J
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Downtown
Posts: 171
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
I don't know what kind of jump Lee had on that play, but the pitch was as close to being a pitch out without being a pitch out as you can get. It was high and outside and it allowed Ross to catch the ball out of the crouch and get right into his throwing motion. He also had a clear view of the runner. I would expect most every catcher to get the out on that pitch.
I thought Lee got a pretty good jump, and at the time I expected him to be safe. I was surprised that Ross got him. Your explaination of the virtual pitchout clears that up.
Bobcat J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 07:16 PM   #13
Razor Shines
Licking County Settlers
 
Razor Shines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
I don't know what kind of jump Lee had on that play, but the pitch was as close to being a pitch out without being a pitch out as you can get. It was high and outside and it allowed Ross to catch the ball out of the crouch and get right into his throwing motion. He also had a clear view of the runner. I would expect most every catcher to get the out on that pitch.
I've always thought that Ross actually gets rid of the ball quickly and throws well. It's the only part of his defense that I think is good. It's odd I think he's above average in throwing out runners but far below average in blocking balls. That WP on Harang should have been a PB, actually he should have turned his glove over and stopped it easily, it looked very lazy.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..."
Razor Shines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 07:31 PM   #14
TOBTTReds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,670
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexRed View Post
Just the first game folks, lot of AB's to come down the road. Only 161 games to go!
It honestly has nothing to do with him going 0-4. It was more about him not having a clue when up at the plate.
TOBTTReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 07:35 PM   #15
paintmered
SERP Emeritus
 
paintmered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
Re: David Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
I don't know what kind of jump Lee had on that play, but the pitch was as close to being a pitch out without being a pitch out as you can get. It was high and outside and it allowed Ross to catch the ball out of the crouch and get right into his throwing motion. He also had a clear view of the runner. I would expect most every catcher to get the out on that pitch.
From my vantage-point, Lee got a good jump off first.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question?

All models are wrong. Some of them are useful.
paintmered is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25