![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,809
|
New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
One thing that can't happen with the new system is for fans of other teams to mosey over here and interact with the ORG folks.
Would folks be interested in having a sub-forum where if a Pirates or Indians fan wanted to come in and kick around some topics about their teams that everyone - ORG and SD - could join in? A lot of these folks tend to be well-known posters in their teams' Redszone equivalents and, while they probably won't be consistent posters on the board, it would certainly be nice to welcome them in when there's actual or possible trades or a series between the Reds and their team or just to discuss general horse race issues. I figure it could be like the minor league forum. I'm curious to hear whether folks think it's a good or lousy idea? People might not care either way too, but you never know whether folks will pick up it and run with it if you don't toss it out there.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,145
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Just curious, but would your proposal mean that ALL talk of other teams would be relegated to that forum, or just talk originating from the keyboards of non-Reds fans?
For example if I wanted to talk about that play Nomar made last night, which forum?
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,809
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
To be honest, I don't know. I don't think you should siphon off all talk about other teams, but it would be nice if an Angels or Rangers fan who wanted to talk about those upcoming series (perhaps they're visiting Cincinnati for the first time) was able to access the full membership.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Personally, I like the idea, but I can see a couple good / bad points to it.
1) Good - it will create more traffic to the site, more interest, allow another forum for ORG and SD members to interact, and be another "feeder" forum for the ORG. 2) Bad - it will create more traffic to the site, use more bandwidth, require more moderation or more time/work for the current mods. In the end, I could see it requiring heavy moderation like RZ was a couple years ago before the rep system was implemented. Not sure if that's what GIK/Boss want at this point in time. Like I said, I'd like that as I myself am interested in more teams than just the Reds.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
RZ Chamber of Commerce
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,246
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
M2, are you more afraid of losing the opportunity to interact with those drive-by visitors or of how SD posters will respond if the drive-by visitors are trash-talkers?
It sounds like you're more worried about the former. Both seem like core issues to me, although in the second case, I think SD posters can distinguish themselves in how they respond (or don't respond) to those visitors.
__________________
/r/reds |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Quote:
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
RZ Chamber of Commerce
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,246
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Quote:
__________________
/r/reds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,809
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Quote:
I figure the SD folks will comport themselves just fine, but I'm looking at this as an area (like the minor leagues) where it might make sense to have the full membership in the tent.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
I like this idea. I don't how often it would get used or how hard it would be to set up and moderate but I like the premise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,422
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Quote:
Maybe add these boards. Cincinnati Bengals Cleveland Browns Cincinnati Bearcats Ohio St Buckeyes Kentucky Wildcats Pittsburgh Pirates Cleveland Indians As far as moderators go, add another two or three and possibly assign one moderator control over a subforum instead of everybody looking out. These forums probably would not generate much activity to garner a need for much moderation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Let's Roll"
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 12,828
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Quote:
I'm sure they won't be flocking here any more than they ever did. Occasional visits and conversation with Ramp, Swamp Turkey, and Matty Mo are really missed. (those are the ones that came to me off the top of my head)
__________________
"Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
2009: Fail
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 7,441
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
As long as people don't suddenly start using the "other baseball teams forum" as a way to bypass the intent of the recient changes, I think it might be a nice addition. Definatley will increase mod workload.
Not that anyone here would ever dream in a million years to try to skirt around the rules.
__________________
a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude. I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
Why not just call it a visitors forum and only allow posters with under a certain number of posts or with special permissions for regular "guests" to create new threads -- with everybody given the ability to respond.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: the corner bar
Posts: 3,752
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
I like this idea alot.
__________________
I've been to dinner at Jimmy Buffet's house, and I've eaten it at a homeless shelter. And there's great joy and harrowing terror to be found in both places. -Todd Snider |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,487
|
Re: New sub-forum for the other 29 teams?
I like this idea quite a bit - while I do love the Reds, I also enjoy talking about the other teams quite a bit.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |