![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
Really--let's say he falls on his face at either stop: what happens? And who cares? Risk of him failing is much less consequential than the possible reward of him becoming something more than a throw-in in a trade (which is to say, nothing). He's never going to be the principal in a trade, so why not try to make him a prospect-level piece? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
One thing Drew has in his corner is that he won't be overmatched on the defensive side of the ball. Even if you put him at AA, he still should be one of the better defensive CFers in the league.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: The Bush Leagues
Posts: 8,423
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Why not? Even Judy's have hot streaks and Stubby's due. It might be nice if it was at a higher level.
Of course, if that happened, we'd only sucker ourselves.
__________________
The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
I still think that if you do this sort of thing you go big or don't go at all. I just am not sure I see the advantage of moving up to the FSL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
That was my first thought as well.
Unfortunately, we don't have any forward thinking people in the organization to come up with something like this, so I doubt you'll see Stubbs go anywhere this season, realistically. That's why this organization drives me crazy. Seems like they run it the same as they did back in the 70's.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,616
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
So Stubbs has had around one year hitting with a wooden bat in professional baseball and everyone and their brother is ready to give up on him. Them people say well hes an older prospect and he shoudl be dominating low A ball. Wasn't Ryan Howard an older prospect. People fail to realize that Howard and Dunn are around the same age. The reds and this front office especially are not going to give up on Stubbs after one year of professional baseball. Not to mention this entire year he has been playing hurt. I have never had turf toe but I hear it is no fun. Why dont we quit with the stubbs bashing and start to give updates on Tim Lincecum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
I couldn't agree anymore to the bolded statement, however.... The Reds recently have shown nothing but an inability to judge talent on both their roster(s) and in the draft. The Reds don't know their "keepers" vs their trading chips. Stubbs never had value for the Reds, and was one of the worst selections in Reds drafting history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
Why give updates on Lincecum? Would you think the same updates for Homer would be as fair? I would love to have another guy that can (and is) strike out over a batter an inning right now. Not that it has anything to do with this discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,713
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
People won't quit Stubbs bashing becuase they are so frustrated with the Reds that all they have is to look forward to the future and rather than look at how far the system has come recently they grasp onto the first thing they can find that is disappointing and tear it apart. People already give updates on Lincecum every time he pitches almost. Its ridiculous around here sometimes.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,481
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
My .02...
Too early to give up on Stubbs or on your development team's ability to teach the kid to hit. He's been in pro ball 1 year. Now, if his name were a critical piece in a deal that brings the Reds a very nice arm, I wouldn't be bothered if Stubbs were traded. But, while he's in the organization, you have to do what's best for the kid's development. For me, a key decision at this point is medical -- is his turf toe a significant drag on his performance? If so, I'd consider having him get the surgery in July or early August and be at full strength sooner for the off-season and 08. The way he's going now, he could end up at .200 and his confidence could get really damaged. If the turf toe is not really a problem, and he's just at a loss at the plate, you have to consider a demotion to Billings, where he could get some feel back. If he strokes it out there for a month, maybe then you vault him to Sarasota in August to join other ex-Daytoners (hopefully Valaika and Turner), but more as a reward and momentum builder for 08 than a bid to polish him for a trade -- though, as I said, if he could help bring back a very nice arm, I wouldn't blink at dealing him. The signs aren't good on Stubbs, but we can't discount his medical situation, and, in my opinion, 1 year is too little time to think of him as nothing but a trading chip. A promotion to Sarasota is too risky -- it's a tough hitter's league, and if he were to bomb his confidence would be seriously gashed. My feeling all along on Stubbs is that it could take 2-3 years for his bat to come, with the biggest risk being that offensive struggles could infect his whole game and outlook. He may be in that territory now, I don't know, but sending him to high A would make it all the more likely. I wouldn't take that risk with him at this point.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Ya can't teach speed...
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indpls
Posts: 341
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Amen Doug Dirt: Geez, the guy is what 22 or 23? Everyone is looking for the next 19 year old phenom. They call them phenoms because they come along so rarely.
Quote:
__________________
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona. Not all holes, or games, are created equal. ~George Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Posts: 504
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
Why are the Reds waiting so long to move Valiaka and Turner? Cozart is already in Dayton. I bet he plays today. Do think they are waiting for Frazier to sign and get to Dayton before they bump them up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Radical Drw Stubbs idea, promote him
I can't imagine the Reds FO has seen enough to give up on him yet. Usually teams ride their #1 picks until the outcome is beyond obvious.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |