RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2007, 06:07 PM   #16
Aronchis
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
Hamilton is actually a slightly below average CF in terms of range.
I don't know where the Reds look for a CF if they don't want to use Bruce or Hamilton there, but if Bruce comes onto the scene and hits like he has hit and Hamilton continues to post an OPS over .800, which there is no reason why he shouldnt, then put Chris Dickerson out there in CF. He wont hit a ton, but he will catch everything in CF.
Yup, if you really want to improve the outfield, deal off the current outfield for young pitching and bring up Dickerson/Bruce next year. That will solve the range problems though the offense will probably take a dive for a year. But how much better it makes the pitching with the improved defense is the question(also with the arms aquired).

Last edited by Aronchis; 07-05-2007 at 06:12 PM.
Aronchis is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-05-2007, 06:07 PM   #17
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
Hamilton is actually a slightly below average CF in terms of range.
I don't know where the Reds look for a CF if they don't want to use Bruce or Hamilton there, but if Bruce comes onto the scene and hits like he has hit and Hamilton continues to post an OPS over .800, which there is no reason why he shouldnt, then put Chris Dickerson out there in CF. He wont hit a ton, but he will catch everything in CF.
Actually Hamilton is slightly better than avg.

2007:

His RF - 2.43
Lg RF - 2.39

Of course his Right Field #'s are dramatically better.

His RF - 3.11
Lg RF - 2.20
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 06:23 PM   #18
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,727
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Actually Hamilton is slightly better than avg.

2007:

His RF - 2.43
Lg RF - 2.39

Of course his Right Field #'s are dramatically better.

His RF - 3.11
Lg RF - 2.20
range factor is a very poor way of looking at defense. He may get a lot more fly balls in the outfield than other guys, therefore his range factor will be higher.

David Gassko wrote this article for The Hardball Times on June 14th and at the bottom is has a spreadsheet for every player for each position. In CF Ryan Freel has 'saved 6 more runs' than Josh Hamilton has in CF this year. Freel rates as +3 and Hamilton rates as -3. He is actually rated at -1, -2 and -3 at each outfield position.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 06:31 PM   #19
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aronchis View Post
Yup, if you really want to improve the outfield, deal off the current outfield for young pitching and bring up Dickerson/Bruce next year. That will solve the range problems though the offense will probably take a dive for a year. But how much better it makes the pitching with the improved defense is the question.
It would make them a great deal better IMO. They are in the upper 3rd of the league in allowing HR's (6th Best in the NL) and Walks (3rd Best in the NL). The main part of this staffs issues are that they give up way too many hits, don't K enough (especially the pen) and are let down by defensive issues.

Part of those issues are the range factor. Few guys on this field have avg. range or above.

The exceptions are BP, Hammy, Freel, Hopper and Ross.

Gonzo is slightly below avg as is EEE

Dunn, Griffey, Hatteberg, Conine, Valentin, Castro are all well below.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 06:36 PM   #20
Degenerate39
Senor Votto
 
Degenerate39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Dunn in left, Bruce in center, and Hambone in right if Griffey retire or is traded.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player
Degenerate39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 06:37 PM   #21
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
range factor is a very poor way of looking at defense. He may get a lot more fly balls in the outfield than other guys, therefore his range factor will be higher.

David Gassko wrote this article for The Hardball Times on June 14th and at the bottom is has a spreadsheet for every player for each position. In CF Ryan Freel has 'saved 6 more runs' than Josh Hamilton has in CF this year. Freel rates as +3 and Hamilton rates as -3. He is actually rated at -1, -2 and -3 at each outfield position.
Well coincidentally Freel is far superior in RF than most anyone playing CF due to his pure speed. If Freel didn't have bad jumps, take bad angles and make more errors he would be the answer full time if his body could take it.

However how that guy came to that conclusion is beyond me, it only takes a ballgame of each to see who the better CF is IMHO. Again Freel has the superior range but he cannot compete with Hamilton who is far superior in every other way, and he is still above avg in CF.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 06:43 PM   #22
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,727
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Well coincidentally Freel is far superior in RF than most anyone playing CF due to his pure speed. If Freel didn't have bad jumps, take bad angles and make more errors he would be the answer full time if his body could take it.

However how that guy came to that conclusion is beyond me, it only takes a ballgame of each to see who the better CF is IMHO. Again Freel has the superior range but he cannot compete with Hamilton who is far superior in every other way, and he is still above avg in CF.
Freel takes bad routes and gets bad jumps, but still gets to a lot more baseballs.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 09:29 PM   #23
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
Freel takes bad routes and gets bad jumps, but still gets to a lot more baseballs.
Yeah I suppose that's so, but he also get's to more OF's if ya know what I mean.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 09:55 PM   #24
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Yeah I suppose that's so, but he also get's to more OF's if ya know what I mean.
He needs a bell on him
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2007, 11:55 PM   #25
MasonBuzz3
Member
 
MasonBuzz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 863
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

I think that Hamilton will be a suitable/above average CF in the near future. The guy has only played what, 15 games, in the past 4 years? I think that his routes to balls, and every other aspect of defense will only get better with the more games that he plays. That being said, he will be a tremendous RF if that's where his future is. gotta love that arm
MasonBuzz3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 12:41 AM   #26
BoydsOfSummer
So Long Uncle Joe
 
BoydsOfSummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton,Ohio
Posts: 3,849
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Milton needs to toss more innings. I'll have a better read on flycatcher ability then.

I know y'all had forgotten, I just thought I'd remind ya that it could be worse.
__________________
0 Value Over Replacement Poster


"Sit over here next to Johnathan (Bench)...sit right here, he's smart."--Sparky Anderson
BoydsOfSummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:55 AM   #27
malcontent
malingered here too long
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,984
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
I think it should be, Hamilton CF, Bruce RF and a Hammer RH Bat in LF.
You can have your hammer RH bat in LF (will Frazier suffice?), so long as the Reds edge out the Nationals in the Alvarez (LH 3B) sweepstakes.
malcontent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 01:30 PM   #28
Chi-Town Red
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 904
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by degenerate10 View Post
Dunn in left, Bruce in center, and Hambone in right if Griffey retire or is traded.
sounds good
Chi-Town Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 03:05 PM   #29
AmarilloRed
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amarillo,Texas
Posts: 3,997
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

You're assuming Dunn is not traded for 2 40- year old relievers at the trading deadline.
AmarilloRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:41 PM   #30
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: Jay Bruce CF or RF?

What are the odds Bruce gets promoted by Aug 4 (the date I just bought Lookouts tickets for)....anyone???
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25