![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
|
Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Free agents, arbitration
From Rob Butcher: Arbitration eligible Phillips Belisle Cantu Saarloos Ellison Free agents Milton Guardado (option) Hatteberg (option) Dunn (option) Valentin (option) Bellhorn ARBIRTRATION Phillips - duh... Belisle - shouldn't command much, I guess I'd keep him around, but wouldn't be heartbroken if they didn't Cantu - keep him. I like his stick; servicable on the field. Saarloos - no thanks...go far far away Ellison - no thanks...go far far away FREE AGENTS Milton - FINALLY!!! Off the books!!! Guardado's option - I wouldn't touch it...not $3 Million Hatteberg's option - I'll take my chances with Votto and Cantu - thanks for everything Hatte! Dunn's option - they'd be pretty stupid not to pick it up Valentin's option - I guess so....he can at least hit..I'll be fair, he became a better catcher with some consistant PT - how much is it? Bellhorn - nice knowing you...actually, it really wasn't.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Last edited by Matt700wlw; 10-04-2007 at 04:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Redsmetz
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,526
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Valentin's option is $1.3 Million ($75,000 buyout).
I think we ought to pick up Hatte's option - very affordable and then consider moving him. We might as well get something for having the rights. I can't say for sure this will pay off, but I think it's a low risk gamble ($1.85 Million option, $150,000 buy out).
__________________
“In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field" The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things, that's Rallyonion.com The Baseball Bookstore http://tsc-sales.com/ http://tscsales.blogspot.com/ http://silverscreenbooks.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
The Reds would have to be absolute morons to not offer Belisle Arb.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,660
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Quote:
Didn't think of that, not a bad option....but I think they would ask Hatteberg that if he were to be a bench guy, would he want to stay? He deserves that respect. He may rather retire or try to find a starting or platoon role with another team, than stay here and sit on the bench.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,987
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Hatteberg is basically $1.6 more to keep him. Trade him and he costs nothing. Trade him midseason and you only pay the pro-rated salary. While the bench will be tight, I think it would be smart to maximize the return on an asset.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,273
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
I look for Saarloos and Ellison to be non-tendered.
And don't be surprised if Eddie Guardado's option is picked up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Redsmetz
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,526
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Quote:
__________________
“In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field" The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things, that's Rallyonion.com The Baseball Bookstore http://tsc-sales.com/ http://tscsales.blogspot.com/ http://silverscreenbooks.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,987
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Quote:
- Boston if they let Lowell walk. Though I imagine they'd set their sights higher. - Giants. Maybe he can platoon with Aurilia again. - Mets. No way they exercise Delgado's option. - Rangers. Have Salty and Laird and have stated they aren't looking for mediocre options. - Tigers. Looking for a replacement for Casey. - Yankees. Nobody wants Giambi playing everyday, but he hits better there and they have 4 OF for 3 spots as it is.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. Last edited by RedsManRick; 10-04-2007 at 05:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,836
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Belisle is a no brainer, he's out third baest starter. A DIPS ERA around 4.50 is pretty good for the money. Should improve.
Hatteberg is a no brainer also, even if its just to trade him. Cantu..depends on what he might get, buy probably. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,266
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
I think Cantu is a no-brainer also. He'll be pretty cheap considering he spent most of year in minors. He'll also settle before going to hearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
That's the problem, and will be one next year if he still is by default...becuase that would mean the Reds didn't do squat to bolster their rotation.
Stick him back in the bullpen....he may have more consistantcy there.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Last edited by Matt700wlw; 10-04-2007 at 05:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,790
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
If the Reds don't offer Belisle arbitration, then something is wrong.
He's the biggest no brainer on that list next to Phillips and Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 9,003
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Playoffs
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,239
|
Re: Reds Free Agents and Arbitration eligibles...
Dunn (option), Phillips (arbitration), Belisle (arbitration), Hatteberg (option), Cantu (arbitration), and Valentin (arbitration) are the guys I'd bring back.
Dunn and Phillips are obvious, and I'd actually look to extend Dunn long term beyond the 2008 option (or scrap the 2008 option and sign him long term anyway). Belisle pitched quite a bit better than the traditional pitching metrics indicate, and that should help keep his salary very much in the bargain range. The Reds should get him fairly cheap next season, and he's a guy I'm looking at possibly putting up numbers similar to an average MLB starter. Cantu should be cheap, and even though I loathe his offensive game (lack of walks), the team could really use a right-handed bat off the bench who can start a handful of games at first base. I'm not a big fan of Valentin by any means, but there's a dearth of catchers out there and the only in-house option is well ... David Ross. Perhaps a guy like Hanigan can step up, but I probably wouldn't look to dump Valentin and depend on Hanigan or somebody else popping up. Plus, even though the Reds called up Hanigan, they rarely used him, which to me is an indicator that they don't consider him much more than a third string catcher or possibly a backup at best. Hatteberg's the interesting one to me simply based off what he's supposedly stated about hoping to get a shot starting somewhere. If I'm the Reds, I'm trying to contact Hatteberg and his agent in an effort to persuade him to stay around beyond his playing years. What I'd like the Reds to do is pick up Hatteberg's 2008 option, start him sparingly/insurance policy for Votto, and let him become one of the NL's premier pinch hitters. If Hatteberg and Cantu are both on the bench, then the bench strength would be significantly improved. Furthermore, I'd like to know what kind of longterm plans Hatteberg has. He's a guy I'd like to see kept in the organization in some capacity beyond his playing days. The best case scenario would be to transition him from starter (2006-07) to bench player (2008-??) to some front office/coaching position after retiring. Of course, the key would be to get him off the active roster and into a coaching spot/front office spot before he turns into a Juan Castro, but I doubt it'd get to that. Saarloos, Ellison, Milton, Guardado, Bellhorn ... don't let the door hit you on the way out.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012 Put an end to the Lost Decade. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |