![]() |
|
|
#61 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Quote:
Give me 8 BCS Conference teams with one loss and watch the circus act unfold. Should be fun.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Quote:
Register, you are an OSU grad, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Yep.
But that's how much I've come to loathe the BCS. (And note I didn't say I'd "rejoice" in a Uof M victory--just that I might be inclined to accept it as a contribution towards the "greater good".)
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,668
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
I might be willing to give up my firstborn before that. That's just crazy talk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
RZ Chamber of Commerce
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,227
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Quote:
__________________
/r/reds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,219
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Ohio State of course.
And the BCS is just fine and dandy. I'll take 12 game regular seasons over stupid playoff crapshoots. But we've been over this many many times before. I'd also take 162 game regular seasons with the two top teams from each league in the World Series. If you want the "true" best team to win that is what you would do. Business doesn't allow it though. And rooting for TOSU to lose to Michigan for any reason is just dumb. I'll let you rethink your position and hopefully you come to your senses.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Quote:
I still think that the best chance of BCS Chaos is to have teams like OSU, LSU, USC, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Oregon, South Florida and Boston College ALL with one loss. Of course, it wasn't that long ago that LUS, USC and Oklahoma all went undefeated, and somehow the BCS lived on...so maybe nothing can bring down the behemothic turd.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Quote:
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,219
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Sure as hell needed it. I would never in a million years root for Ohio State to lose any game, much less Michigan. And I definately wouldn't do it for a crapshoot playoff. Playoffs stink in every sport and ruining the true unique nature of CFB is just absurd, IMO.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Thanks dad. You sure showed me!
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Yeah, probably it is...but so is using complex computer algorithms to determine your champion. College football is like the bizarro world of athletics.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
I know most will disagree with me but I like the current BCS setup. It gives me greater interest in every single game because I know one loss makes it nearly impossible to make the championship game. I also enjoy the other major bowls and the opportunities to see the conference champs play each other. As a Louisville fan and casual OSU fan, every one of their games is exciting to me because its sudden death. A playoff would have its advantages, but it would also diminish a great regular season where every game matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Not this year it doesn't.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
It happens. This is a truly abnormal year. I think even a 4 or 8 team playoff would generate significant controversy because of the immense parity. And while we may have two one loss teams in the championship game this year that still doesn't change my feelings about the BCS. I know you disagree with me but regardless I enjoy the BCS games each year and I'm sure I will this year as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: Who Should Be #1 In College Football?
Is anyone deserving of the title this year?
Conference play has revealed a lot of parity as the Big East, SEC, PAC-10, and Big 12 are all beating up on themselves. Is this the year of mediocrity in college football? OSU has been heavily criticized but everyone else has disappointed while they've done as expected. Although, the way things are going they might lose to MSU today. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |