RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2007, 11:11 AM   #1
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
Matt Garza

Every sports writer in the country seems to believe Garza will be traded for a young bat. Now the Twins beat writer is pimping a Garza for Carlos Quentin deal.

www.twincities.com/walters

If Carlos Quentin is all they are seeking, surely we can offer a LOT more. Maybe something like Votto and Francisco? The Twins also supposedly like Hatteberg. GET IT DONE, WAYNE!
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-28-2007, 11:42 AM   #2
TOBTTReds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,673
Re: Matt Garza

This seems like a deal that can be made. Hamilton for Garza? Seems like that would easily do it if Quentin is what they wanted.
TOBTTReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 11:43 AM   #3
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvesIce51 View Post
This seems like a deal that can be made. Hamilton for Garza? Seems like that would easily do it if Quentin is what they wanted.
Seriously. I would start with an offer of Votto and Francisco if all they were seeking was Quentin.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 11:48 AM   #4
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvesIce51 View Post
This seems like a deal that can be made. Hamilton for Garza? Seems like that would easily do it if Quentin is what they wanted.
Makes sense to me. Quentin is not a CF, which is what the Twins need ... and Quentin is coming off a poor season due to an injured shoulder.

I'd go Hamilton, Hatty and a minor league arm.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 11:57 AM   #5
TOBTTReds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,673
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
Seriously. I would start with an offer of Votto and Francisco if all they were seeking was Quentin.
I would rather try to trade a surplus area for us. After Hatte, who would play first unless we move Dunn there, then I would have NO problem with this.
TOBTTReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 11:57 AM   #6
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
Re: Matt Garza

The Twins are also negotiating with the Red Sox for Coco Crisp. Garza is allegedly on the block in that deal.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:01 PM   #7
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,921
Re: Matt Garza

If the Sox get Garza, I have to believe they'd be shipping him elsewhere. Imagine Crisp + Prospect for Garza and then Garza, Lester, Prospect (Lowrie?) for Haren.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:03 PM   #8
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
Re: Matt Garza

I can see the Reds offering Votto for Garza or Votto and Stubbs. I see Jr. leaving after 2008 to either retirement or FA. without Jr. I see Dunn finally making the switch to 1B. that gives the Reds an OF of Hamilton, Bruce and somebody. I'd hate to lose Votto, but the if the Reds are really going for it in '08, they need another SP.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:04 PM   #9
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
If the Sox get Garza, I have to believe they'd be shipping him elsewhere. Imagine Crisp + Prospect for Garza and then Garza, Lester, Prospect (Lowrie?) for Haren.
That sounds very realistic. The Twins would ask for cash, too, which the Red Sox would happily include.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:06 PM   #10
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Matt Garza

I would think the Twins would be a lot more interested in OFs than 1Bs.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:24 PM   #11
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
I would think the Twins would be a lot more interested in OFs than 1Bs.
Some, but, remember this is a team that wasted DH at bats on Jason Tyner, so it's not like they'd have to be all that picky about position to wind up with an offensive upgrade somewhere.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:29 PM   #12
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Matt Garza

Too bad the Reds have no CFs. I imagine that fact alone removes them from consideration for a deal like this.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:45 PM   #13
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
Too bad the Reds have no CFs. I imagine that fact alone removes them from consideration for a deal like this.
No, they have no CF's equal to the perceived skill of Torii Hunter. Both Votto and Hamilton trump his bat many times over.

I guess it depends on the pitch and the pitchman.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 12:59 PM   #14
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
Too bad the Reds have no CFs. I imagine that fact alone removes them from consideration for a deal like this.
You could sell Hamilton as a CF based on the supernatural athlete tag. Plus, it doesn't sound like it has to be a CF, if the Twins are seriously considering Carlos Quentin, then Hamilton's got more than enough glove to fill the bill.

Votto's the guy who probably doesn't fit because of Justin Morneau. The Twins have no need for a 1B.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 01:02 PM   #15
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
Re: Matt Garza

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
Too bad the Reds have no CFs. I imagine that fact alone removes them from consideration for a deal like this.
It's going to depend on what they get for Santana, isn't it? If they get a CFer + pitchers for him, they'll look to fill other positions for Garza or a pitcher they get in that deal. But, if they're even looking at Crisp, it's probably safe to assume they want some serious defense in CF, because they're not looking at him for his bat.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25