RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2007, 11:47 AM   #1
GoReds
Cruisin' for trouble
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 3,287
Bailey for Rios being discussed?

per mlbtraderumors:

Elliott also said the Reds are interested in Alex Rios. If the Giants are pondering sending Tim Lincecum to the Jays for him, I imagine the Reds would have to counter with Homer Bailey. Bailey, however, is less proven than Lincecum.
GoReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-06-2007, 11:49 AM   #2
redsfan4445
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

i have always liked Rios too, but to trade a young starter when we NEED starters doesnt make sense,, offer Hamilton straight up for him!
redsfan4445 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:51 AM   #3
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,667
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

That is a no-brainer, but ain't gonna happen.
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:51 AM   #4
Puffy
Puffy 3:16
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Alex Rios is a stud. Bailey is a POTENTIAL stud.

With one you know what you are getting - offensive production.

With the other you hope what you might get down the road - Ace pitcher.

I would do it and then worry about trading away outfield parts to get pitching later. Rios is that good.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum."
- - Rowdy Roddy Piper

"It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man"
- - Fletch
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:51 AM   #5
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,758
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Love rumors that don't make sense.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:52 AM   #6
BrooklynRedz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 767
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfan4445 View Post
i have always liked Rios too, but to trade a young starter when we NEED starters doesnt make sense,, offer Hamilton straight up for him!
Unless you're going to trade Bruce for a young starter.
BrooklynRedz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:53 AM   #7
BRM
Let's ride
 
BRM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

I doubt Toronto would prefer Bailey over Lincecum. It will probably take another prospect in addition to Bailey to trump the Giants offer.
BRM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:53 AM   #8
pahster
Something clever
 
pahster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,898
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Maybe Rios can play RCF next year.
pahster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:54 AM   #9
Puffy
Puffy 3:16
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRM View Post
I doubt Toronto would prefer Bailey over Lincecum. It will probably take another prospect in addition to Bailey to trump the Giants offer.
I think the Jays wanted to make the deal, but it was the Giants who balked. So who Toronto prefers wouldn't necessarily enter into it as the Giants have walked away from the table.

With that said, another prospect probably wouldn't be needed depending on how they value Bailey.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum."
- - Rowdy Roddy Piper

"It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man"
- - Fletch
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:55 AM   #10
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Why would this team trade pitching for OF help? That isn't exactly filling our needs
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:55 AM   #11
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,921
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

If you can trade Bruce and change for Bedard and then flip Bailey for Rios, I think you've done a service to the team.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:57 AM   #12
membengal
Member
 
membengal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,382
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

RMR, as much as I like Bruce (or, really, the thought of Bruce), I completely agree.
membengal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 12:00 PM   #13
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,400
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
Love rumors that don't make sense.
Yeah, the Reds don't need a CF and Homer is just shedding his Jim Maloney shell right?
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 12:00 PM   #14
Puffy
Puffy 3:16
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
If you can trade Bruce and change for Bedard and then flip Bailey for Rios, I think you've done a service to the team.
Yeah, and I firmly believe that Bruce is as close to untouchable as there is.

But turning Bruce and Bailey into Bedard and Rios - thats straight up potential for sure fire above average production. Not to mention Bedard is dominant lefty and Rios is righty on a left handed heavy offensive team.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum."
- - Rowdy Roddy Piper

"It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man"
- - Fletch
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 12:01 PM   #15
dabvu2498
Yay!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,262
Re: Bailey for Rios being discussed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
If you can trade Bruce and change for Bedard and then flip Bailey for Rios, I think you've done a service to the team.
Agree totally... but I don't think one move should be made without the other.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done.
dabvu2498 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25