![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Reds Re-sign Votto?
I saw this on Yahoo Sports...
Quote:
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
He sure could hit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 701
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Everyone has a contract. The Reds just got Joey's done early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,628
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
They just assured Votto that he will be a Red next year officially and he won't be let go by the organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Get rid of Scotty, Votto and Keppinger are capable of holding down 1st. I don'y want to take away from Vott's AB's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Recovering Cubs Fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 710
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Scott Hatteberg is a valuable commodity, you don't just "get rid" of him.
__________________
FIRE DUSTY Never mind. The man is clearly a genius. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
I like him but we don't have room for him, trade him or let him go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
He sure could hit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 701
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Apparently a good bench isnt of any importance to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,297
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 109
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
There's zero reason to move Hatt. He's affordable, a good leader and someone you definitely want if this team makes it to post season play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,311
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Agreed. That said, I do have an open mind. If someone out there has an idea to get rid of Hatte, make this year's team better, and not increase payroll please put it out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Ya can't teach speed...
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indpls
Posts: 341
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
I can see Votto, his minor contract expires at the end of this year, but what about Tatum and Janich. They are still owned by the Reds for two more years. The Reds are under no obligation to sign them to anything more than what is required by the standard minor league contracts based on level of play and time of service. What kind of contract are we talking about?
__________________
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona. Not all holes, or games, are created equal. ~George Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 530
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Plus, there are always times when you need an extra bat. Votto might be sick for a few days, tired, hurt or whatever. Plus you need a DH for the AL park interleague games, and Hatteberg gives you a good one. No reason to get rid of him unless someone surprises you with a really good offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
trade Hatteberg for B prospect, sign Chris Shelton, give Shelton AB's versus LH pitchers at 1B. Shelton will be a better hitter at a cheaper price...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,311
|
Re: Reds Re-sign Votto?
Quote:
Why can't Votto play everyday? Also, I would favor Hatteberg coming off the bench late vs a righty as opposed to Shelton coming into face a lefty. I know thats hard to compare but still...Shelton is K prone. Dollar figures aside...am I in the minority who would rather have Hatte than Shelton??? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |