![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,406
|
Kevin Goldstein on Volquez
From his chat today...
Walter L (Orono, ME): After "Revamping his mechanics" this offseason, would Volquez fall in your top 100 right now? If so, around where? What kind of pitcher does he end up being? Kevin Goldstein: Edinson's pitched 80 innings in the big leagues, so he wouldn't be eligible. That said, I've always been a huge fan of his upside, and I'm in the extreme minority it seems in thinking that the Reds got the better end of that deal. http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ch...php?chatId=447
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 6,536
|
Re: Kevin Goldstein on Volquez
He apparently does NOT read Redzone.....
__________________
"Is there a problem officers?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: Kevin Goldstein on Volquez
Or maybe he does, because from what I can gather, most think the deal favors neither. It's a trade that looks to greatly benefit both teams, as both Hamilton and Volquez are very good players that fill needs with their current teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Kevin Goldstein on Volquez
I think the general Redszone consensus was win-win.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 6,536
|
Re: Kevin Goldstein on Volquez
Didn't we have a poll? I thought the result was that it was a Reds win based on all the questiosn surrounding Hamilton (drugs, body-age, etc.).
I wish I could figure out the Search option, I would try to find the poll.
__________________
"Is there a problem officers?" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |