![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,634
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
My only wish is that the Brantley situation would be put to rest before he departs. It reaks of the Larkin situation with him leaving on bad terms.
If the rumor is true (Dunn to the Rays), the Rays are definitely a good partner. There's not a team in baseball with better prospects than Tampa. I don't want to see Dunn go, but I think the return could be best there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,975
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
I hope he's outta here. Just don't see where and how he fits into the Sox picture. If I'm running the Sox and I want to improve my team, I dont add Junior.
Pending approval has got to mean that the Sox have to pick up his '09 option. 16 mill for THAT???? I hope Jr understands that in Chicago he wont be the captain of the ship (that's Ozzie's personality/job) and therefore he's not guaranteed to bat in the first-inning. It could get ugly when Jr gets into Ozzie's doghouse next week after jogging out a groundball. Last edited by LINEDRIVER; 07-31-2008 at 10:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
With the way Konerko is hitting, I'd be shocked if it they didn't use him as a DH in a platoon with Paulie with Thome covering 1B when Junior plays.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,378
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
Interesting stuff from the Sox board on mlb.com
They are saying Jr and a reliever(Affeldt or Weathers) for Anderson and someone else.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
|
I thought you'd be bigger
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Green Country
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
Clearly I don't know 2500 very well. Disregard previous post.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,656
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
I'd love to see Griffey win a World Series and accepting a trade to the White Sox would give him a very good chance at winning it all. The White Sox currently have the third best run differential in all of baseball (and only +2 behind the Red Sox for second place). They have as a good a chance as anybody at winning the World Series this year.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
I want no part of Brian Anderson unless he slots in behind Dickerson on the depth chart. He hasn't hit since 2005. Just bring up Dickerson and be done with it.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
I saw on the Sox board that there is a deal for Street pending the outcome of the Jr trade.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 2,849
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
I think it's just as ridiculous to absolve Griffey from all blame (his contract handcuffed the team for years, not to mention his injuries) as it is to put all blame on him. It's my belief the Reds would have done better without him--and no one was more thrilled than me when "the trade" happened.
__________________
"Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 859
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
Sorry if this doesn't turn out to be true, but I just heard someone saying that Griffey turned the trade down.
__________________
For Love of the Game "If you aren't first; you're last" |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,488
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
Quote:
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,123
|
Re: Griffey Jr Traded to the White Sox (Pending Griffey Approval)
1530 says 'insiders' are reporting he has accepted.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |