![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Standings for draft purposes
Add what you like but I wanna track the top 5-6 teams who have a chance to still draft ahead of the Bengals. And a guess at the corresponding player they might pick if it stays the same.
Coming into today's games. #1 - Detroit (0-13) #2 - Cincy (1-11-1) #3 - K.C. (2-11) #4 - Seattle (2-11) #5 - St. Louis (2-11) #6 - Oakland (3-10) #7 - Cleveland (4-9) After Today's games. #1 - Detroit (0-14) Matt Stafford QB #2 - St. Louis (2-12) Andre Smith OT #3 - K.C. (2-12) Malcolm Jenkins CB/S or Trade Down #4 - Cincy (2-11-1) Rey Maualuga LB #5 - Seattle (3-11) Chris Wells RB #6 - Oakland (3-11) Michael Crabtree WR #7 - Cleveland (Has not played yet) If they win they are eliminated from this conversation.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,453
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Mike Brown has to love dropping out of the top two, I am sure he is praying they win out so it will cost him less money when he drafts a running back or wide reciever with that draft pick.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I hate everything about Mike Brown.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,585
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Oher is tackle prospect 1a. If they can't get Smith you take Oher, or vice versa.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
You and me share similar feelings when it comes to Mike Brown.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I'm not on the Rey Maualuga bandwagon.
He has great potential, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't make any sense to draft linebackers when we can't even win a battle in the trenches. Maualuga does nothing to help with that. The last thing this team needs right now is linebackers, or for that matter any defensive player not on the front line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
We'll take Oher at 4 unless he grades out terribly at pre-draft combines and camps. If we fall any farther, (it is not out of the realm of possibilities that we win our final 2 games vs. a Dorsey-led CLE and KC at PBS) it'd be Wells or Mauluga.
__________________
The land was farther away from the core and had much less gravity so bigness could develop and dominate -Jose Canseco |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 454
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Can Michael Crabtree even be drafted? If I'm not mistaken he is a sophomore and I thought you had to be at least a junior.
__________________
Baseball is not necessarily an obsessive-compulsive disorder, like washing your hands 100 times a day, but it's beginning to seem that way. We're reaching the point where you can be a truly dedicated, state-of-the-art fan or you can have a life. Take your pick. ~Thomas Boswell Having a life is overrated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Redshirt sophmores can be drafted.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,361
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I'm sorry but they need lineman. They need lineman bad. So i wonder which rb/wr/lb/db they'll take.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
They need guys in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Difference makers. It's so simple, yet Mikey boy doesn't get it and never will. P.S. - I still hate him.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
If we do fall, I wouldn't mind seeing us take either Eugene Monroe or Michael Johnson. And I do believe Knowshon Moreno will be better than Beanie Wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Rey Maualuga.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
When you get an opportunity to take a presence like Maualuga you just do it. Unless of course Andre Smith is still ava. for us and we don't re-sign Andrews. Personally I'd rather re-sign Andrews he's a known commodity to an extent. Ya never know for sure how these guys will do when they turn pro.
Maualuga Scouting Report 1's and 2's are good on scouting reports, 3's, 4's & 5's not so much. But if they do re-sign Andrews the line is fine. LT - Jones (Collins waiting in the wings) LG - Whitworth C - This is a question mark IMO but Smith ain't a center. RG - Bobbie Williams RT - Andrews Where in the world would Smith play assuming that happens? And BTW according to his scouting report he's a very, very good LT but not quite elite with regards to his pass blocking. Top 40 underclassmen prospects: Offense Quote:
Oher is also a good prospect but not worthy of a top 5 pick IMO. Monroe Scouting Report Monroe is too risky from a medical standpoint for top 5 money. Michael Johnson Scouting Report Michael Johnson is good but again not top 5 too many doubts for my liking.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes Last edited by Mario-Rijo; 12-15-2008 at 11:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
As for known commodities, offensive linemen are the safest picks you can make in the NFL draft. Not the flashiest, but a definite necessity for any successful team. I'm just throwing this out there, but with the character antics of Chad Johnson growing a bit stale and TJ refusing to discuss a contract extension, would anybody be opposed to taking Michael Crabtree? My biggest issue is that I see a lot of Peter Warrick in him potentially. Not so much the character as much as productivity. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |