![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
But the OL is in shambles. Levi's hurt all the time, and plays like he's hurt even when he's not, Whitworth's solid but Williams is getting older(though admittedly I haven't seen a drop off in his play, and Stacy Andrews wishes he could play as well as Levi does when Levi's hurt. Ghiaciuc wishes he could play as well as Andrews.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I agree that the offensive line problem needs to be addressed, but you're just not going to draft an offensive lineman in the first ten picks unless he's a franchise left tackle. If that franchise left tackle isn't available, then consider trading down. However, the linebacking depth is so terrible right now that spending the first pick on a player like Maualuga isn't necessarily a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
1.Michael Oher. IMO he is a franchise left tackle. Has size and everything you would look for. 2.Andre Smith. Size is the only reason I would rate him behind Oher. 3.Rey Maualagua. Of course, a lot can happen between now and the offseason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,808
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Someone mentioned Matt Stafford earlier in this thread...I have to say, being a Gator fan and watching this guy closely in SEC play, he is probably one of the most overrated QB's I have ever seen. I don't say that as a Gator fan; I would love to have Knowshon Moreno either in Orange & Black or Orange & Blue, as well as AJ Green and several of their other players. But Stafford is simply another story. I can promise you all that, if football had a sabermetrics system like basball, no stat heads would like the guy. Billy Beane would never draft him, of that I can assure you.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,465
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
1.Unlike Matt Leinart, who had nothing left to prove at the college level, Stafford could only improve his chances the following year barring injury. 2.He could redeem himself and likely make Georgia a contender even if Moreno departs. That being said, Georgia has the no 2 QB in the nation coming in next season and my guess is Stafford will likely bolt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: End of the bench
Posts: 738
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
I also expect to read that in the third pre-season game, someone comes unblocked through the Bengals porous line and drills Beanie for a 3 yard loss. Beanie Wells watches the rest of the Bangals season from the sidelines.
__________________
"Hyperbole is the greatest thing ever" Redsland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
SERP deep cover ops
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 5,364
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
BTW, with last weeks win, they dropped from #2 pick to #4. This weeks win could drop us to #6 depending on how Oakland and/or Seattle do.
It's Classic Bengals season...play so poorly in the first half to remove all hope, but play just well enough after it doesn't count to create hope for next season while simultaneously ruining your draft choice. It's happened so often I'm beginning to think it's a formula. The difference between the #2 pick and the #6 or higher pick could be pretty hefty.
__________________
"It doesn't get any better than this," --Marty Brennaman |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Go Reds Go!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,825
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,455
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
He was going to win atleast 2 Heismans.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I think Powlus is a really good comp for Stafford.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I didn't think Matt Ryan was all that either when he went to the Falcons. I think for a lot of these QB's it really depends on who they go to and how well they perform with what little they have. Detroit might be a good situation for Stafford especially when you have Smith in the backfield and Johnson to throw to.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
When I hope the Bengals start to lose to get the best draft pick as possible they start winning. They can't even lose right
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
I can't think of 5 words that would better describe this disaster of a team. Well said, sir. Well said.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Standings for draft purposes
Quote:
#2 - K.C. (2-13) Andre Smith OT vs. Michael Crabtree WR TT #3 - St. Louis (2-13) Michael Oher OT vs. Sam Bradford QB #4 - Cincy (3-11-1) Rey Maualuga LB vs. Michael Crabtree WR vs. Aaron Maybin (if he comes out) #5 - Cleveland (4-11) Michael Crabtree WR vs. Malcolm Jenkins DB #6 - Seattle (4-11) Chris Wells RB vs. vs. Sam Bradford QB #7 - Oakland (4-11) Aaron Curry OLB vs. Jeremy Maclin WR Cincy has no chance of drafting in the top 3 as of now with that tie in hand. And worse this miserable season could end up with us out of the top 6 as well with a win at home against K.C. next week. I'm giving K.C. the edge however although not by much with us at home and playing better defense. But LJ, Tony Gonzales, Thigpen and Bowe should be diverse enough to throw us a tough game. Let's just say as I much as I hate to lose ever I wouldn't be opposed to the outcome of having the #4 pick in the draft. So to recap, if we lose we cannot get a higher draft pick but also cannot fall out of the top 4. If we win we could tumble as far as the #7 slot. *Also I added to the eventual picks (the guy furthest left) a VS. player that would no doubt be arguable for them in that spot. I added 2 for the Bengals because Crabtree and Maybin show some logic IMO.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes Last edited by Mario-Rijo; 12-22-2008 at 11:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |