RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2008, 10:59 AM   #31
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Ok, but I think we have more good O-Lineman than LB's. But I guess you don't agree. Dhani Jones too me is a pretty good stop gap and nothing more and Jeanty isn't much either IMO. Rivers, Maualuga and Brandon Johnson/Blackstock might be interesting to watch develop.
I agree counting on Dhani is tenuous at best.
But the OL is in shambles. Levi's hurt all the time, and plays like he's hurt even when he's not, Whitworth's solid but Williams is getting older(though admittedly I haven't seen a drop off in his play, and Stacy Andrews wishes he could play as well as Levi does when Levi's hurt. Ghiaciuc wishes he could play as well as Andrews.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-16-2008, 01:03 PM   #32
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Standings for draft purposes

I agree that the offensive line problem needs to be addressed, but you're just not going to draft an offensive lineman in the first ten picks unless he's a franchise left tackle. If that franchise left tackle isn't available, then consider trading down. However, the linebacking depth is so terrible right now that spending the first pick on a player like Maualuga isn't necessarily a bad idea.
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 02:31 PM   #33
WVRed
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
 
WVRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
I agree that the offensive line problem needs to be addressed, but you're just not going to draft an offensive lineman in the first ten picks unless he's a franchise left tackle. If that franchise left tackle isn't available, then consider trading down. However, the linebacking depth is so terrible right now that spending the first pick on a player like Maualuga isn't necessarily a bad idea.
My prerank is this:

1.Michael Oher. IMO he is a franchise left tackle. Has size and everything you would look for.

2.Andre Smith. Size is the only reason I would rate him behind Oher.

3.Rey Maualagua.

Of course, a lot can happen between now and the offseason.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
I've read books about sparkling vampires who walk around in the daylight that were written better than a John Fay article.
WVRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 10:05 PM   #34
TheBigLebowski
Winning the Human Race
 
TheBigLebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,808
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Someone mentioned Matt Stafford earlier in this thread...I have to say, being a Gator fan and watching this guy closely in SEC play, he is probably one of the most overrated QB's I have ever seen. I don't say that as a Gator fan; I would love to have Knowshon Moreno either in Orange & Black or Orange & Blue, as well as AJ Green and several of their other players. But Stafford is simply another story. I can promise you all that, if football had a sabermetrics system like basball, no stat heads would like the guy. Billy Beane would never draft him, of that I can assure you.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.
TheBigLebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 10:54 PM   #35
15fan
Member
 
15fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,465
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski View Post
Someone mentioned Matt Stafford earlier in this thread...he is probably one of the most overrated QB's I have ever seen.
He's a rich man's Ron Powlus.
15fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 04:41 PM   #36
WVRed
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
 
WVRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski View Post
Someone mentioned Matt Stafford earlier in this thread...I have to say, being a Gator fan and watching this guy closely in SEC play, he is probably one of the most overrated QB's I have ever seen. I don't say that as a Gator fan; I would love to have Knowshon Moreno either in Orange & Black or Orange & Blue, as well as AJ Green and several of their other players. But Stafford is simply another story. I can promise you all that, if football had a sabermetrics system like basball, no stat heads would like the guy. Billy Beane would never draft him, of that I can assure you.
I think he would be better served to return for his senior year.

1.Unlike Matt Leinart, who had nothing left to prove at the college level, Stafford could only improve his chances the following year barring injury.

2.He could redeem himself and likely make Georgia a contender even if Moreno departs.

That being said, Georgia has the no 2 QB in the nation coming in next season and my guess is Stafford will likely bolt.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
I've read books about sparkling vampires who walk around in the daylight that were written better than a John Fay article.
WVRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 05:16 PM   #37
Newport Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: End of the bench
Posts: 738
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc D View Post
As a Buckeye fan I was hoping that maybe the threat of the two Ohio "pro" teams lurking in the top 5-10 of the draft might somehow help keep Beanie at OSU 1 more year to avoid being drafted by either but alas, they will be in the top 5-10 again next year so he might as well go.

Good luck Beanie.
I fully expect Mike to take Beanie.

I also expect to read that in the third pre-season game, someone comes unblocked through the Bengals porous line and drills Beanie for a 3 yard loss.

Beanie Wells watches the rest of the Bangals season from the sidelines.
__________________
"Hyperbole is the greatest thing ever" Redsland
Newport Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 04:16 PM   #38
WebScorpion
SERP deep cover ops
 
WebScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 5,364
Re: Standings for draft purposes

BTW, with last weeks win, they dropped from #2 pick to #4. This weeks win could drop us to #6 depending on how Oakland and/or Seattle do. It's Classic Bengals season...play so poorly in the first half to remove all hope, but play just well enough after it doesn't count to create hope for next season while simultaneously ruining your draft choice. It's happened so often I'm beginning to think it's a formula. The difference between the #2 pick and the #6 or higher pick could be pretty hefty.
__________________

"It doesn't get any better than this," --Marty Brennaman
WebScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 04:25 PM   #39
UKFlounder
Go Reds Go!
 
UKFlounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,825
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by WebScorpion View Post
BTW, with last weeks win, they dropped from #2 pick to #4. This weeks win could drop us to #6 depending on how Oakland and/or Seattle do. It's Classic Bengals season...play so poorly in the first half to remove all hope, but play just well enough after it doesn't count to create hope for next season while simultaneously ruining your draft choice. It's happened so often I'm beginning to think it's a formula. The difference between the #2 pick and the #6 or higher pick could be pretty hefty.
Classic Dead-Cat bounce
UKFlounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 06:08 PM   #40
redsfanmia
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,455
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by 15fan View Post
He's a rich man's Ron Powlus.
He was going to win atleast 2 Heismans.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life.
redsfanmia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 08:59 PM   #41
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by 15fan View Post
He's a rich man's Ron Powlus.
I think Powlus is a really good comp for Stafford.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 11:47 PM   #42
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Standings for draft purposes

I didn't think Matt Ryan was all that either when he went to the Falcons. I think for a lot of these QB's it really depends on who they go to and how well they perform with what little they have. Detroit might be a good situation for Stafford especially when you have Smith in the backfield and Johnson to throw to.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 11:52 PM   #43
Degenerate39
Senor Votto
 
Degenerate39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
Re: Standings for draft purposes

When I hope the Bengals start to lose to get the best draft pick as possible they start winning. They can't even lose right
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player
Degenerate39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 09:19 AM   #44
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
They can't even lose right.
I can't think of 5 words that would better describe this disaster of a team. Well said, sir. Well said.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 10:59 AM   #45
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: Standings for draft purposes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Add what you like but I wanna track the top 5-6 teams who have a chance to still draft ahead of the Bengals. And a guess at the corresponding player they might pick if it stays the same.

Coming into today's games.

#1 - Detroit (0-13)
#2 - Cincy (1-11-1)
#3 - K.C. (2-11)
#4 - Seattle (2-11)
#5 - St. Louis (2-11)
#6 - Oakland (3-10)
#7 - Cleveland (4-9)

After Today's games.

#1 - Detroit (0-14) Matt Stafford QB
#2 - St. Louis (2-12) Andre Smith OT
#3 - K.C. (2-12) Malcolm Jenkins CB/S or Trade Down
#4 - Cincy (2-11-1) Rey Maualuga LB
#5 - Seattle (3-11) Chris Wells RB
#6 - Oakland (3-11) Michael Crabtree WR
#7 - Cleveland (Has not played yet) If they win they are eliminated from this conversation.
#1 - Detroit (0-15) Matt Stafford QB vs. Sam Bradford QB
#2 - K.C. (2-13) Andre Smith OT vs. Michael Crabtree WR TT
#3 - St. Louis (2-13) Michael Oher OT vs. Sam Bradford QB
#4 - Cincy (3-11-1) Rey Maualuga LB vs. Michael Crabtree WR vs. Aaron Maybin (if he comes out)
#5 - Cleveland (4-11) Michael Crabtree WR vs. Malcolm Jenkins DB
#6 - Seattle (4-11) Chris Wells RB vs. vs. Sam Bradford QB
#7 - Oakland (4-11) Aaron Curry OLB vs. Jeremy Maclin WR

Cincy has no chance of drafting in the top 3 as of now with that tie in hand. And worse this miserable season could end up with us out of the top 6 as well with a win at home against K.C. next week. I'm giving K.C. the edge however although not by much with us at home and playing better defense. But LJ, Tony Gonzales, Thigpen and Bowe should be diverse enough to throw us a tough game. Let's just say as I much as I hate to lose ever I wouldn't be opposed to the outcome of having the #4 pick in the draft.

So to recap, if we lose we cannot get a higher draft pick but also cannot fall out of the top 4. If we win we could tumble as far as the #7 slot.

*Also I added to the eventual picks (the guy furthest left) a VS. player that would no doubt be arguable for them in that spot. I added 2 for the Bengals because Crabtree and Maybin show some logic IMO.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes

Last edited by Mario-Rijo; 12-22-2008 at 11:05 AM.
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25