![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Quote:
I like this deal a lot. Reasonable rate for an .800 OPS 3B.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 837
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
I like!
__________________
"Rounding Third and Heading for Home" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
The good news is they won't have to pay any of the signing bonuses unless he gets 600 AB's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
EE receives the bonus regardless of performance. He will pick up a 25,000$ bonus for 600 PA
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cincy
Posts: 498
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Makes a lot of sense for both sides. Glad to have Edwin back in the mix.
__________________
RALLY CAPS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 180
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Excellent. Now we can focus on other things, like pondering Willy Taveras or the left field vacancy. EE deserves the money. What's more hilarious 1) a $50,000 Gold Glove bonus or 2) a $100,000 bonus for World Series MVP?
http://www.jeromesredscare.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Quote:
signing bonus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Sounds reasonable.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
It's fine for this year - next year is the problem. We're set for the following salaries in 2010:
BP 6.75 EE 4.75 Tavares 4 Harang 12.5 Arroyo 11.0 Cordero 12.0 Gonzo 6.0 (option, more likely Gonzo is Gone-zo) That's a lot of jack - $51M not counting Gonzo - for 6 guys of a 25 man roster. None of them are superstars, mostly high-risk low-reward. Luckily we have Votto (who should be arb eligible) and Bruce (should not be) who should be cheap yet productive, otherwise we are looking at rookies to fill out out the rest of the roster (with Lincoln and Rhodes totalling $4.5M) - to give us an ~$70M roster - with the SAME issues of no SS and C, and Wily Tavares the "answer" in CF. Plus, we'll have Votto, Volquez, and Cueto - and possibly Owings, Keppinger, Burton and/or Bray - eligible for arbitration.... Excuse me, while I kiss the sky - and puke in my mouth! PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 Last edited by BLEEDS; 02-17-2009 at 05:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
Good deal. I think this will be EE's breakout campaign.
__________________
The land was farther away from the core and had much less gravity so bigness could develop and dominate -Jose Canseco |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
We Need Our Myths
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Overlooking GABP
Posts: 4,163
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
I like it. I was afraid the number would be much bigger. I'm pulling for the kid and really hope he busts out in a big way this summer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 136
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
I'm sick of having this ugly crybaby manning third base.
Baseball is a business, too. You sign MARKETABLE players. - No ugly faces. - No ugly names (Wigginton, Encarnacion, Edwin, Gomes) - Good ball players |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 929
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
There have been a number of posts in the org concerning the implications of this deal with respect to minor league 3B candidates.
My read is that the Reds are not confident that any of these candidates will be ready in 2010. The two year deal for EE provides a measure of safety. Should someone develop into a can't miss prospect during this year, EE's 2010 salary would not preclude dealing him for a one year rental to fill a hole elsewhere. On the other hand, limiting EE's contract to two years may indicate a belief that one of these candidates is likely to be ready by 2011. I think it is a good signing that provides an affordable, acceptable hedge against some of the prospects failing to measure up to our lofty Redszone expectations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: way-east of cincinnati
Posts: 1,158
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
This is the year for EE to prove he's not another DD, (Danny Driessen). DD had unbelievable athleticism, but jello for brains. I sincerely hope EE has some sense to go with his talent, but thus far he hasn't shown it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 793
|
Re: Reds reach agreement with Encarnacion
If he makes any of those incentives the second year will be cheap.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |