![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
GO XAVIER!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: overland park, kansas
Posts: 1,612
|
juan francisco at short?
i saw where he played some tonight at short. is there any chance he could be getting a look there to see if he could be our future ss? he could give us that big time power bat at short like some of the better teams seem to have.
__________________
there's nothing like bowling a 300 game! 13 now and retired. ![]() Ricky henderson has a higher OBP than C. patterson and he's retired. C. Trent 6-14-2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,385
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
I've always heard Francisco is likely destined for the outfield as he's no sure thing at 3B. I have to doubt he could play shortstop.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Thats about as likely as us moving Bronson Arroyo to center
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,659
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
He didn't play short. Whoever was running the MLB Gameday data did a terrible job. Between that and Yonder Alonso's 'three run HR' (it was a 2 run HR, Chris Heisey scored on the previous play) it was a rough night for the person running the system in Zebulon.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 9,482
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
maybe the Reds addressed that when they bumped Frazier to LF and kept Francisco at third. Reds' current idea: Francisco is the better prospect and gets to stay at third. of course, these being the Reds, they may just be waiting for Francisco to "play his way off the position." but if EdE hasn't yet played his way off third, then how dreadful would Francisco have to defend in order to get moved? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,477
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 9,482
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
but that said, my guess was that Francisco's best position was OF and that the Reds are repeating the EdE mistake with him-- putting him at a position that he'll just never master. me, if I really thought that Francisco is the best prospect and his best talent is "hitter", not "third baseman," then he goes to the OF. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,660
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS Last edited by mth123; 04-04-2009 at 09:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 9,482
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
I'm not sure they have this right, but at least a decision has been made by the Indecisives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
I don't know how you term a guy that struggles to reach base at a .300 clip in A & A+ ball a "prospect" at all.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,910
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
He clearly needs to make improvements in terms of his plate discipline, but when you're in A and AA, you nurture upside.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
Chipper Jones -- .353 (A+) Alex Rodriguez -- .379 (A) David Wright -- 369 (A+) Aramis Ramirez -- .390 (A+) Evan Longoria -- .402 (A) Melvin Mora -- .352 (A+) Carlos Guillen -- .405 (A) Jorge Cantu -- .313 (A+) Casey Blake -- ..339 (A+ 2 season) Edwin Encarnacion -- .387 (A+) Mike Lowell -- .403 (A/A+) Adrian Beltre -- .407 (A+) Scott Rolen -- .392 (A+) Alex Gordon -- .427 (AA) Garret Atinks -- .421 (A+) Mark Reynolds -- .419 (A+) Ryan Zimmerman -- .377 (A/AA) Kevin Kouzmanoff -- .401 (A+) Chone Figgins -- .358 (A+) Pedro Feliz -- .310 (A+) Jack Hannahan -- .362 (A+) Juan Francisco -- .303 (A+) I don't get how anyone thinks the future is anything but an extremely uphill climb for Mr. Francisco. There are lots of other interesting tools there, but nothing about his OBP suggests good things for the future.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,821
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
Reason 1 - Francisco played at A plus ball at age 21. He's not yet 22 and firmly in AA. He won't be 22 until late June. He has plenty of time to develop better discipline. Reason 2 - Francisco has a lifetime slugging percentage of .467 and last year - in a pitcher's league - it was .496 in a full season of at bats. That's more than an interesting tool. Reason 3 - He made Baseball America's all Winter League team with .360/.419/.665 in 161 at bats. Yes, it's Winter League, but the numbers are not shabby. And he hit 12 homers in regular play and 6 more in the playoffs. This kid is a powerhouse. There is a chance he'll fail if he can't become more patient but his upside is incredible. Last edited by Kc61; 04-04-2009 at 06:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
And, if that's your argument -- that it's a skill that Francisco is going to develop -- why on earth are you pushing him up the ladder and hoping the skill manifests against better competition? There's no shame in repeating high-A ball -- several of the players on that list did. If the goal is to develop a skill, why push when he's already a little ahead of the age-level curve to begin with? The list doesn't lie -- very few 3bs advance to AA without that skill (OBP) in their back-pocket already. Why should we believe Francisco will succeed swimming against that stream. Counterargument 2: His SLG is fantastic, and his raw power appears prodigious. It doesn't negate the fact that, if his OBP doesn't improve significantly, he'll NEED to SLG in the .475+ range if he's going to be even an average offensive corner infielder. Counterargument 3: His winter-league numbers were good, but if I recall, the winter league numbers tended to skew heavily in favor of offense. I really hope they're a sign of things to come, but there is a full A-ball and a full high A-ball season that both say Francisco isn't a .400+ OBP player, especially since that .400 OBP was driven heavily by the unsustainable .360 BA. I just don't see it from Francisco. Power is a good thing, but even power can't save an out-machine.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... Last edited by Caveat Emperor; 04-04-2009 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,821
|
Re: juan francisco at short?
Quote:
I would doubt that very many players have been as productive as Francisco by age 21 - considering the level of competition. And we all know that the FSL is a pitcher's league. Last edited by Kc61; 04-04-2009 at 07:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |