New nominees to the ORG - Page 3 - RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion

BLEEDS · 05-29-2009, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayBruce32

One thing I've noticed.....

all these folks getting in are people I've never seen post on here. Anyone else notice that? Name after name and its people that I don't recognize, and I'm on here several times a day and reading into every thread.

I've pretty much figured out that if you post a lot, every now and then you'll make a post that some don't see eye to eye with and that will keep you in the Sun Deck for eternity. Or until the Reds win the series and we all get grandfathered in as part of the celebration.

I agree.

PEACE

-BLEEDS

camisadelgolf · 05-29-2009, 03:36 PM

Brutus the Pimp averages 0.23 posts per day, and of all the people I've voted for, he was my easiest 'yes'. Based on the discussion we've had about him, the other members of tORG seem to feel similarly.

Feel free to check out some of his posts so you can get an idea of what type of poster tORG likes to vote for.

http://www.redszone.com/forums/searc...induser&u=4437

RedsManRick · 05-29-2009, 08:49 PM

Quality, irrespective of quantity.

texasdave · 06-03-2009, 02:54 PM

If you want to be elected to ORG simply throw in some facts to back up whatever assertion you are trying to make. Many of the opinions held by members of SunDeck are just as valid as the opinions held by members of ORG. Just take a couple of minutes to find a nugget or two to support whatever opinion it is that you are espousing. That's it. If you state your position clearly and support it, then people will respect that. They may disagree and they may try to shoot holes in your post. But they will still respect your post. One more thing. Don't take people disagreeing with your post on a personal level. Disagree politely. Oh, one more thing. Know when to let things drop. If you have gone back and forth a couple times on a subject then just let it go. Everyone isn't going to have the same opinion on everything concerning baseball in general and the Cincinnati Reds in specific.

::::quietly steps off my soapbox::::

NorrisHopper30 · 06-07-2009, 01:06 AM

I think my name may be blocking me from the ORG

*BaseClogger* · 06-07-2009, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorrisHopper30

I think my name may be blocking me from the ORG

Maybe you should apply...

nate · 06-07-2009, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorrisHopper30

I think my name may be blocking me from the ORG

Maybe you should add some asterisks.

texasdave · 06-07-2009, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorrisHopper30

I think my name may be blocking me from the ORG

You have a better chance than if you had the name "WilyTaveras30".

05-29-2009, 03:36 PM	#32
camisadelgolf Vampire Weekend @Bernie's Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 11,311	Re: New nominees to the ORG Brutus the Pimp averages 0.23 posts per day, and of all the people I've voted for, he was my easiest 'yes'. Based on the discussion we've had about him, the other members of tORG seem to feel similarly. Feel free to check out some of his posts so you can get an idea of what type of poster tORG likes to vote for. http://www.redszone.com/forums/searc...induser&u=4437

05-29-2009, 08:49 PM	#33
RedsManRick Stat Wanker Hodiernus Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 14,921	Re: New nominees to the ORG Quality, irrespective of quantity. __________________ Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

06-03-2009, 02:54 PM	#34
texasdave Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 9,575	Re: New nominees to the ORG If you want to be elected to ORG simply throw in some facts to back up whatever assertion you are trying to make. Many of the opinions held by members of SunDeck are just as valid as the opinions held by members of ORG. Just take a couple of minutes to find a nugget or two to support whatever opinion it is that you are espousing. That's it. If you state your position clearly and support it, then people will respect that. They may disagree and they may try to shoot holes in your post. But they will still respect your post. One more thing. Don't take people disagreeing with your post on a personal level. Disagree politely. Oh, one more thing. Know when to let things drop. If you have gone back and forth a couple times on a subject then just let it go. Everyone isn't going to have the same opinion on everything concerning baseball in general and the Cincinnati Reds in specific. ::::quietly steps off my soapbox:::: Last edited by texasdave; 06-03-2009 at 04:44 PM.

06-07-2009, 01:06 AM	#35
NorrisHopper30 Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Milford, Clifton Posts: 1,585	Re: New nominees to the ORG I think my name may be blocking me from the ORG __________________ Follow me on twitter @EricLilly7 Check out my Reds blog! Hit me up with any advice on it at anytime, it's always appreciated. http://redscheatsheet.blogspot.com/

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode