![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
that remains to be seen. However, he is certainly taking on risk at this point.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
If what Reedy's reporting is correct, the Bengals aren't even matching what the #6 pick in the draft last year got. The heck with slotting, what basis are the Bengals using for their numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,325
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Signing Andre Smith for $1 would've been a waste of money. Aside from the fact that he's a fat slob, what else would he offer the team? His strong suit isn't even as a pass blocker and that was the Bengals main concern. He's a head case and everyone knew it.
The blame falls squarely on the Bengals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Quote:
It all depends on where each side views the slot and with Smith holding out I would think the Bengals have a legit argument for holding firmer and firmer. The more he holds out the less value he is to the bengals this year so why should they be giving in when they are actually losing money on investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
I have a feeling Reedy is getting his info from Keels. Im quite sure he isnt getting it from the Bengals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
I wouldn't be surprised if Keels' meeting with the Bengals doesn't end up on Hard Knocks. Reedy's sources are more likely to be from within the Bengals. We aren't talking about national security here.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Reedy sources are probably pretty limited inside the Bengals. I doubt many people other than the Browns and Keels are in the negotiations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Quote:
While we certainly needed an OT, Smith wasn't the guy, IMO. With the 6th pick, there were plenty of better athletes on the board that played other positions than OT. Such as: Eugene Monroe (although he shouldn't have been a top 10, IMO) BJ Raji Michael Crabtree Aaron Maybin Brian Orakpo (the guy I really wanted the Bengals to take) Malcolm Jenkins Jeremy Maclin Percy Harvin If we really had our heart set on an OT, then we could have traded down to take Eugene Monroe, or Michael Oher. We certainly didn't need to waste the 6th pick on Andre Smith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Andre Smith was easily one of the most talented tackles in the entire draft. In fact, many were saying he was as talented as the #2 overall pick, Jason Smith, but fell due to the dreaded "character concerns" (mainly his debacle at the combine).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,610
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Keels is making a contradictary argument. He wants "slot" money but he is using two players that blew "slow" away. Sanchez got a deal that is given to a franchise QB. Those are known to be higher than "slot" but is expected when you think a QB will be your franchise QB. DHB got an insane deal from an insane man that blew "slot" out of the water again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Go Reds Go!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,823
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Those 2 deals simply created a new "slot" and the Bengals were not prepared for other teams to be willing to sign players so soon. They could have been more agreesive in trying to sign Smith, but they waited for the market to set the price, and not that it has, they're still unable to make a deal.
Just because the slotting number was increased by those other teams does not mean the system changed If the 6th pick getting more money that the 7th pick is such a difficult concept for this organization, that might explain their track record. Quote:
__________________
http://www.civilwarobsession.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
DHB and Sanchez were the 1st couple picks to sign so I dont really buy into the notion that this was all avoidable if they would have just been proactive. Dlus the dude didnt even have an agent till something like May 28th. Sanchez signed on the 10 of June. There was no chance the Bengals were going to beat that date.
Both sides should be looking at Monroes contract not Sanchez and DHB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,266
|
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com
Quote:
My guess is, the Bengals saw blue-light special, while Smith's camp figured he was prime-rib. That, and what's a Bengal pre-season without a first round Smith hold out?
__________________
4009 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |