|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Prospect #9 runoff vote | |||
| Brad Boxberger |
   
|
50 | 58.14% |
| Neftali Soto |
  
|
36 | 41.86% |
| Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-09-2009, 07:57 PM
|
#16 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,913
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Soto. Kid looks like he can hit and and won't be 21 until February. Boxberger is still a mystery IMO.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
11-09-2009, 08:50 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,666
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Quote:
Boy, I'd hate to see us lock ourselves in to arbitrary rules at the expense of common sense. Heck, I didn't even vote for Maloney this time, and I might not if he were included in the runoff, but there was a clear natural cutoff between three and four.
__________________
"In baseball, you don't know nothin'"...Yogi Berra |
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2009, 10:49 PM
|
#18 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,108
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:00 AM
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,107
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Went Boxberger in the original vote, Boxberger again. I do hope some of the unhappy Maloney voters will change their minds and vote. It doesn't seem like much of a big deal and it will give a more credible result. It seems unlikely that Maloney would have won over Boxberger in a three way run-off since that would require adding a margin of 7. He'd likely have to have gotten half the other votes (cast by voters who might not have had as much incentive to vote at all since their first choices were not in the poll.) So, if let's say, the likely best Maloney would have done in the 3-way runoff is 2nd, then nothing is changed--he'll still be running next time against Soto or Boxberger for the 2nd spot of the 3 in question.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 09:37 AM
|
#20 |
|
15 game winner
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sultanes de Monterrey
Posts: 4,174
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
I don't see the point in even having a runoff to be honest. Someone has the most votes, they win, no reason to overcomplicate things.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:23 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,107
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Quote:
Agree. Seems simplest. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 01:17 PM
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
I agree, I won't vote for Maloney either...
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 01:30 PM
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,040
|
Re: Prospect #9 runoff vote
Soto, I've seen him w/ my own eyes, and while I voted for Leake earlier, just don't know enough about Box yet, though hope he puts up huge numbers this year and challenges for a top 5 spot next years
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Linear Mode
